Connect with us

Business and Finance

Will AI-generated models help or hurt diversity in the industry?

Published

on

Brands which are serious about social inclusion “will continue to hire these models of color,” says Lalaland.ai CEO and innovator Michael Musandu

CHICAGO (AP) – London model Alexsandrah has a twin, but not in the way you may expect: Her counterpart is fabricated from pixels, not flesh and blood.

The virtual twin was generated by artificial intelligence and appeared as a alternative for the real Alexsandra Photo session. Alexsandrah, who uses her name professionally, receives credit and compensation each time her version of the AI ​​is used – similar to a human model.

Alexsandrah says she and her alter ego mirror one another “even down to the little hairs.” This is one other example of AI transformation creative industries – and the way people may or might not be compensated.

Model Alexsandrah poses with a pc showing her image generated by artificial intelligence, London, Friday, March 29, 2024. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

Advocates say the growing use of artificial intelligence in fashion modeling showcases diversity in all sizes and shapes, enabling consumers to make more tailored purchasing decisions, which in turn reduces fashion waste resulting from product returns. Digital modeling saves corporations money and creates opportunities for individuals who wish to work with this technology.

But critics have raised concerns that digital modeling could put models – in addition to other professionals equivalent to make-up artists and photographers – out of labor. Unsuspecting consumers will also be fooled into considering that AI models are real, and firms can take credit for meeting diversity commitments without employing real humans.

“Fashion is exclusive, and people of color have limited opportunities to enter it,” said Sara Ziff, a former model and founding father of Model Alliance, a nonprofit organization that goals to advance employees’ rights in the fashion industry. “I think the use of AI to distort racial representation and marginalize actual models of color exposes this disturbing discrepancy between the industry’s stated intentions and its actual actions.”

Especially women of color have long faced higher barriers to entry in modeling and artificial intelligence could upend a few of the achievements they’ve achieved. The data suggests that girls usually tend to work in professions where a given technology could and is used more liable to displacement than men.

In March 2023, iconic jeans brand Levi Strauss & Co. announced that it can test AI-generated models produced by Amsterdam-based Lalaland.ai so as to add a wider range of body types and underrepresented demographics to its website. However, after receiving widespread backlash, Levi clarified that she was not backing down from her plans for live photo shoots, the use of live models, or her involvement with diverse models.

“We do not see this (AI) pilot as a way to increase diversity or as a substitute for real action that needs to be taken to achieve our diversity, equity and inclusion goals, and it should not have been presented this way,” Levi said in his statement then.

Last month, the company said it had no plans to scale its AI program.

The Associated Press reached out to several other retailers to ask whether or not they use artificial intelligence fashion models. Target, Kohl’s and fast fashion giant Shein declined to comment; He didn’t reply to a request for comment.

Meanwhile, spokespeople for Nieman Marcus, H&M, Walmart and Macy’s said their corporations don’t use artificial intelligence models, although Walmart clarified that “suppliers may have a different approach to the photography they provide for their products, but we do not have that information.”

Nevertheless, corporations that generate artificial intelligence models are finding demand for the technology, including Lalaland.ai, which Michael Musandu co-founded after he became frustrated by the lack of clothing models that looked like him.

“One model does not represent everyone who actually shops and buys the product,” he said. “As a person of color, I have felt this painfully myself.”

Musandu says his product is meant to enhance traditional photo sessions, not replace them. Instead of seeing one model, shoppers could see 9 to 12 models using different sized filters, which might enrich their shopping experience and help reduce product returns and fashion waste.

The technology actually creates recent jobs because Lalaland.ai pays people to coach its algorithms, Musandu said.

And if brands “are serious about their inclusivity efforts, they will continue to hire these models of color,” he added.

Michael Musandu, co-founder and CEO of AI fashion company Lalaland.ai, poses for a portrait in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Friday, March 8, 2024. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)

Black London model Alexsandrah says her digital counterpart has helped her stand out in the fashion industry. The real Alexsandrah even replaced a computer-generated black model named Shudu, created by Cameron Wilson, a former fashion photographer turned CEO of The Diigitals, a British digital modeling agency.

Wilson, who’s white and uses he/she pronouns, designed Shudu in 2017, featured on Instagram as “the world’s first digital supermodel”. However, critics at the time accused Wilson of cultural appropriation and digital blackface.

Wilson took the experience as a lesson and transformed The Diigitals to ensure that Shudu – which he was booked by Louis Vuitton AND BMW — didn’t take away opportunity, but as an alternative opened up opportunities for girls of color. For example, Alexsandrah does She personally posed as Shudu for Vogue Australiaand author Ama Badu got here up with the story of Shudu i portrays his voice in interviews.

Alexsandrah said she is “extremely proud” of her work with The Diigitals, which created her very own AI twin: “It’s something that even when we’re gone, future generations will be able to look back and think, ‘These are pioneers» .’”

But for Yve Edmond, a New York model who works with major retailers to check the fit of clothes before selling to consumers, the rise of artificial intelligence in modeling seems more insidious.

Edmond worries that modeling agencies and companies are using models, who are generally independent contractors who have few labor protections in the U.S., to use their photos to train artificial intelligence systems without their consent or compensation.

She described one incident in which a client asked to photograph Edmond moving his arms, crouching and walking for “research” purposes. Edmond refused and later felt cheated – her modeling agency told her she was booked for a fitting, not to build an avatar.

“This is a complete violation of the law,” she said. “It was really disappointing for me.”

However, in the absence of AI regulations, it is the responsibility of companies to be transparent and ethical in the implementation of AI technologies. Ziff, founder of Model Alliance, compares the current lack of legal protection for fashion industry workers to the “Wild West.”

That’s why Model Alliance is pushing for legislation like the one being considered in New York State, which would provide for: Fashion Workers Act would require management companies and brands to obtain express written consent from models to create or use a digital replica of a model; specify the amount and duration of compensation and prohibit the modification or manipulation of the digital replica of models without consent.

Alexsandrah says that with ethical use and proper regulation, AI can open doors for more models of color like her. It has informed its clients that it has an AI replica and directs any inquiries about its use to Wilson, whom it describes as “someone I do know, love, trust and is my friend.” Wilson says they make sure that any compensation for Alexsandrah’s AI is comparable to what she would earn in person.

Edmond, however, is more of a purist: “We have this amazing Earth that we live on. And you have a person of every color, every height and every size. Why not find this person and compensate him?”

!function(){var g=window;g.googletag=g.googletag||{},g.googletag.cmd=g.googletag.cmd||(),g.googletag.cmd.push(function(){ g.googletag.pubads().setTargeting(“film-recommended-film”,”true”)})}();

Featured Stories

The post Will AI-Generated Models Help or Hurt Diversity in the Industry? appeared first on TheGrio.


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business and Finance

Black Men Buy Homes aims to increase black home ownership

Published

on

By

Black Men Buy homes, Atlanta


Kevan and Ayesha Shelton took off Black men are buying houses to help reduce the black home ownership gap between men and girls.

The growth rate of Black women homebuyers has reached 7.3% since 2017. Growth from 2018 to 2020 exceeded doubled rate of three.4% amongst black men, BLACK ENTERPRISES reported.

The Sheltons are concerned concerning the gap between men and girls. This is a way for them to start buying homes for black men provide information directly to Black men. According to Shelton, the ignorance creates significant barriers for black men Atlanti.

“Black men often face challenges when purchasing homes due to limited information about the process and financial resources, which can hamper their ability to secure funds for down payments, credit and closing costs. The goal of our initiative is to break down these barriers so that more Black men can achieve the dream of home ownership,” the Sheltons said.

On October 12, the Sheltons hosted the inauguration Black men are buying houses event in Atlanta. The event was held in cooperation with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and Operation HOPE. Operation HOPE founder John Hope Bryant was available to impart knowledge on the importance of Black financial literacy and wealth.

While Black women are outpacing men in homeownership, additionally they face barriers. TO BE reported on the barriers women encounter of their pursuit of ownership. Debt, access to mortgages, student loans and low wages are cited. It appears that Black women have access to the precise home buying resources and tools, but they lack the power to use these tools to their advantage.

“…If you are a black woman in America, you will likely have difficulty purchasing a home in many circumstances,” said Jacob Channel, an economist at LendingTree. Channel pointed to “social obstacles that… shouldn’t exist” that make things “unnecessarily difficult” despite the growing variety of black women who own homes.

Black women don’t face these obstacles alone. As organizations, e.g Black men are buying houses, help close the gap between Black men and Black women, the complete community will need to consider how to overcome structural biases and inequalities.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Crypto surges after Trump’s election – but is it a good ethical investment?

Published

on

By

Estimated 18 million Americans are invested cryptocurrency– says the Federal Reserve. And the United States has just chosen pro-crypto-president.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have change into trendy digital resource. Supporters say crypto undermines capitalism because it bypasses traditional bankers. Crypto perhaps offer quick riches together with an environment of high-tech sophistication.

Early adopters reaped enormous advantages, and plenty of of them became millionaires and billionaires.

Currently, there are approx 100,000 cryptocurrency millionaires. Moreover, cryptocurrency wealth has been built Fairshake, the most important political lobbying group within the US During the last election, it helped elect 253 pro-crypto candidates.

But is cryptocurrency a good ethical investment?

as business professor who studies the technology and its implications, I even have identified three ethical harms related to cryptocurrency which will give investors pause.

Three wrongs

The first harm is excessive energy consumptionparticularly Bitcoin, the primary decentralized cryptocurrency.

Bitcoins are created or “mined” by tens of hundreds of computers in huge data centers, which contributes significantly to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. Bitcoin mining, which accounts for the lion’s share of cryptocurrency’s energy consumption, uses as much as 0.9% of worldwide electricity demand – near Australia’s annual energy demand.

Secondly, unregulated and anonymous cryptocurrencies are the payment system of alternative for criminals fraud, tax evasion, human trafficking AND ransomware – the latter cost victims an estimated $1 billion in fraudulent cryptocurrency payments.

Until about a decade ago, these bad actors generally moved and laundered money through money and shell corporations. However, around 2015, many individuals switched to cryptocurrency, which is a much less cumbersome type of service dirty money anonymously.

The bank cannot store or transfer money anonymously. By law it is a bank passively complicit in money laundering if not enforced get to know your customer measures to curb bad actors resembling money launderers.

However, within the case of cryptocurrency, legal and ethical responsibility can’t be transferred to the bank – the bank doesn’t exist. So who is complicit? Any member of the cryptocurrency ecosystem will be seen as ethically complicit in enabling illegal activities.

Enegix employees work at a data center in Ekibastus, Kazakhstan, certainly one of the world’s largest Bitcoin mines, January 3, 2023.
Meiramgul Kussainova/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

I find these first two harms to be probably the most ethically troubling. The first harms the Earth, the second undermines global systems of trust – the interplay of institutions that underpin economic activity and social order.

The third problem of cryptocurrency is its predatory culture.

A predatory system, especially without regulatory oversight, exploits small investors. And some cryptocurrencies have enriched their founders by reaping the advantages lack of investor knowledge about virtual currency.

Some cryptocurrencies, especially smaller coins and initial coin offerings, do Characteristics of Ponzi schemes.

For example, the now defunct Bitconnect promised investors big profits who exchanged their Bitcoins for Bitconnect tokens. New investors’ money paid out “profits” to the primary layer of investors with later investors’ money.

Ultimately, Satish Kumbhani, founding father of Bitconnect, decided to achieve this indicted by a federal grand juryand from 2024 his whereabouts are unknown.

A pernicious myth

In addition to the ethical harms of cryptocurrency, there is a pernicious myth surrounding digital coin. The myth of inclusion is the idea that cryptocurrency has the facility to profit especially socially disadvantaged people without a checking account.

The world’s poor who wouldn’t have bank accounts and who could use cryptocurrency for international money transfers to family back home don’t necessarily enjoy the advantages of cryptocurrencies. It’s for this reason need pay conversion and transfer feessay, dollars to cryptocurrency, after which from cryptocurrency to the local currency of the person receiving the cash transfer.

In fact, the distribution of crypto assets is largely concentrated among the many wealthy. A 2021 study found that simply 0.01% of Bitcoin owners controls 27% of its value.

The democratization of finance is often presented as a move geared toward breaking the dominance of traditional financial institutions – private banks and government central banks. However, this narrative didn’t prove true.

Instead, a latest elite emerged: cryptocurrency creatorsearly supporters of i conservatorswho modify the cryptocurrency’s software code and influence its future direction. This group exercises disproportionate control, including over cryptocurrency management. All of this reflects the concentration of power that cryptocurrency was intended to dismantle.

Just a little more ethical?

To be fair, the cryptocurrency community has not ignored the criticism, including calls for greater environmental awareness.

In early 2021, community members founded Cryptocurrency Agreement. The group has recruited around 250 crypto corporations to cut back environmental damage.

The following 12 months, Ethereum took its most important step with its Ether coin. It has reduced its size energy consumption by over 99% by migrating to a coin mining mechanism called “proof of stake”, which doesn’t require miners to unravel complex, energy-intensive puzzles to validate transactions.

It was a daring move. However, Bitcoin, the most important cryptocurrency, has not followed in Ethereum’s footsteps. Bitcoin stands out in that its energy consumption exceeds that of another cryptocurrency.

A worker stands between two rows of bitcoin mining machines along a wall.
A employee installs a latest row of bitcoin mining machines on the Whinstone US bitcoin mining facility in Rockdale, Texas, October 9, 2021.
Mark Felix/AFP/AFP via Getty Images

To address other harms of cryptocurrency, some Regulatory authorities began to regulate the cryptocurrency market in 2023, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States have launched efforts to curb criminality and protect investors.

In January 2024, US regulators listed funds allowedthat are popular investment funds for investing in cryptocurrencies. The move was intended to assist small investors trade in a safer market.

However, normalizing cryptocurrency trading could have perverse ethical consequences.

For example, probably the most successful ‘ethical’ fund in 2023, Nikko Ark Positive Change Innovation Fundwas successful with a 68% return because he bet on cryptocurrencies. Its manager rationalized this investment by repeating the parable that cryptocurrency allows “providing financial services to underbanked people

Where does all this leave the ethical investor?

I consider that investors have two clear ethical options regarding cryptocurrencies: they will abandon Bitcoin or no less than put money into other cryptocurrencies that minimize harm, especially environmental harm.

However, even so-called ethical investments raise hidden ethical issues.

Many ethical investors put money into the so-called ESG funds that emphasize social or environmental impact. Some of those ESG funds may avoid holdings in oil corporations by investing directly or not directly in cryptocurrencies.

This doesn’t seem ethically coherent.

While cryptocurrency offers exciting opportunities and the potential for prime returns, its environmental impact, links to criminality and predatory nature pose significant ethical challenges.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Daymond John celebrates the fifth annual Black Entrepreneurs Day

Published

on

By

shark tank, Black Entrepreneurs Day, Daymond, John, deal, stalker, grants, Black entrepreneurs


Daymond John will have a good time the fifth anniversary of Black Entrepreneurs Day in Atlanta for the first time.

November 22, John’s signature Black Entrepreneur Day (BED) will take over Atlanta’s historic Fox Theater to have a good time Black Excellence and Opportunity. This 12 months’s event is free for all to attend and includes brand activations that enable participants to reinforce their business and brand for the foreseeable future.

From insightful discussions with inspiring guests to the NAACP Small Business Powershift Grant Program, which can award over $1 million in grants to over 40 Black-owned businesses, Black Entrepreneurs Day offers the whole lot a Black business owner needs to raise take your corporation to the next level the next level. This 12 months’s event is special for John; In addition to hosting BED in Atlanta for the first time, the event shall be streamed live for all to enjoy.

“We’re doing it live this year and we’re always trying to improve what we have,” John says BLACK ENTERPRISES.

“I think we added another element to it called ‘Entrepreneur Square,’ where if you want to come early, you can come in and a company like Constant Contact takes photos. Hilton for Business, Chase, Chase Wealth Management is there, US Navy. You add a lot of different things to it.”

It shall be a star-studded event featuring Grammy-winning artist and philanthropist Kelly Rowland, iconic artist Flavor Flav, influential media personality Charlamagne tha God, Olympic gymnast Jordan Chiles (presented by JP Morgan Wealth Management), financial educators Rashad Bilal and Troy Millings with “Earn Your Leisure” and a live performance by multi-platinum Atlanta rapper 2Chainz presented by Raising Cane’s.

Through the NAACP small business Powershift grant program, entrepreneurs can do exactly that use to the Powershift Grant program and grow to be one in every of 40 firms awarded a share of grants value over $1 million. This 12 months, partners including JPMorgan Chase, Hilton, T-Mobile for Business and Constant Contact will contribute a complete of $100,000 in grants, with each grant valued at $25,000.

“We are very passionate about what we do,” John says of the Black community. “I think we can now gain more power by democratizing the retail space with solutions like artificial intelligence and social media. Let’s support each other and support each other.”

Given the strong sponsorship support for BED 2024, John sees it as clear evidence that giant corporations recognize the value of investing in the Black community, even in the face of opposition from anti-DEI efforts.

“There are many other cultures that love to support us as well. They love our music, they love our food, they love everything about us and they just want to know how they can support us,” notes John.

“I think if we look at it this way, it means we can never gain or thrive on our shortcomings, but we can always find those gems and ways to grow from what we are. We are a resilient nation loved by all.”

Launched in 2020 to handle the challenges facing the community in the wake of the events surrounding George Floyd, Black Entrepreneurs Day was established to shift the focus from hardship to empowerment. Designed to uplift Black entrepreneurs, the event goals to teach and encourage through conversations with iconic Black leaders and celebrity guests, features celebrity musical performances and offers key financial support through the NAACP Powershift Grant program.

Tickets for Black Entrepreneurs Day 2024 are free and may be purchased at: BlackEntrepreneursDay.com Now. Press play to learn more about this 12 months’s event.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending