Connect with us

Politics and Current

Critics are warning black voters about Trump’s “anti-white racism” agenda if he is re-elected

Published

on

A possible second Trump administration will reportedly try to roll back capital programs intended to handle generations of discrimination against Black and Brown Americans.

Democratic strategists are sounding the alarm amongst black voters after a report indicates that if Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump returns to the White House, his allies and longtime associates will prioritize policies on “anti-white racism.”

According to Axlesa possible second Trump administration will seek to roll back capital programs designed to handle generations of discrimination against Black and Brown Americans, including decades-old federal programs and essentially the most recent programs established by President Joe Biden.

“I wish I could say this report is shocking, but honestly, the Trump campaign has been nothing short of consistent in defending white supremacy and extremist policies,” Jamarr Brown, executive director of Color of Change PAC, told the Grio Journal. “The Trump candidacy has always been entirely focused on creating a more hostile world for Black people while dismantling any pre-existing protections for Black communities.”

In a manifesto referred to as Project 2025, The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank advised by former Trump presidential transition director Johnny McEntee, lays out a conservative agenda for a hypothetical second Trump administration.

The nearly 900-page guide includes policy guidelines akin to ending what it calls “affirmative discrimination,” including diversity, inclusion and equality programs, which it says are “tools” of “unlawful discrimination.” In other words, the document suggests that equity programs under Biden and the previous administration discriminate against white people.

In March 2023, Trump it slammed shut President Biden’s executive order establishing an equity lens across the federal government, calling it a “Marxist concept.” The former Republican president, if elected in November, has vowed to “get this extremism out of the White House, out of the military, out of the Department of Justice and out of our government.”

“As Trump and his allies plan to dismantle ‘anti-white’ racism, we must really highlight the real disparities in our system that require federal protections for Black people,” said Brown of Color of Change PAC.

The former executive director of the Texas Democratic Party rejected Trump-aligned numbers that suggest federal systems rooted in equality are “broken” because they were “never built to work for all communities and people in the first place.”

“Our educational spaces, our economy, our criminal justice systems and our electoral systems are designed to operate exclusively for the white and wealthy,” he added.

The concept of anti-white racism has already seen success in high-profile legal battles, a few of which were devised by Trump’s allies and advisers.

In 2021, a Texas judge ruled against the Biden administration’s $29 billion Covid-19 restaurant relief program for girls and minority-owned businesses on the grounds that it discriminates against a white male restaurant owner. The plaintiff within the case was represented by the America First Legal Foundation, a conservative litigation firm founded by Stephen Miller, a former Trump White House adviser.

WASHINGTON – AUGUST 2: Senior adviser Stephen Miller speaks during a news conference on the White House in Washington, Wednesday, August 2, 2017. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

The legal argument within the Texas case focused on the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which states that no state may deprive an individual of life, liberty, or property without due strategy of law. The clause has historically been utilized in landmark cases that ended racial segregation in schools, upheld race-conscious affirmative motion in college admissions, and guarded the voting rights of Black Americans.

Today, conservative litigants are winning lawsuits under the identical clause of the 14th Amendment on behalf of white residents, alleging that they’ve been harmed by programs designed to handle generational inequalities affecting Black communities. So far, the Equal Protection Clause has been used to effectively end President Biden’s debt relief program for Black farmers and force the Minority Business Development Agency to open its programs to white businesses reasonably than disadvantaged communities.

The clause of the 14th Amendment has also been used to invalidate race-based affirmative motion, which was decided by the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court and made possible by three of President Trump’s nominees.

Reecie Colbert, a Democratic strategist and commentator, told TheGrio that the Project 2025 agenda and legal cases derailing equity programs intended to eliminate racial disparities affecting Black and brown communities are “the opening salvo to what we would see under a Trump administration.”

“They’re trying to make us second-class citizens (and) bring us back to the Jim Crow era,” said Colbert, who warned Black voters that “our citizenship will be on the ballot in 2024.” She added: “I don’t know if it has dawned on you yet how terrible the situation is.”

Colbert argued that even the Supreme Court’s ruling invalidating President Biden’s student loan debt relief program, which was intended to profit Black and brown borrowers, and the Republican-led effort to finish DEI programs are tied to the broader goal of thwarting all progress in addressing racism, disparities in wealth, education and business.

“They do it because… he is making progress. And really, DEI is an excuse to attack racial equality,” she said. “In the same way that CRT (Critical Race Theory) was an excuse to attack history taught even at the elementary school level.”

Antjuan Seawright, a longtime Democratic strategist, told TheGrio that if Trump and his allies’ plan becomes reality, it might completely “push us backwards full steam ahead.”

“Just releasing this kind of strategy or plan should be a friendly reminder to everyone, but especially Black people, that progress is not sustainable.” He added: “It’s a constant fight and it needs to be reinforced every day.”

MANHATTAN, NY – JUNE 14: A protester holds a homemade sign reading “Trump is not America” ​​in the midst of a crowd gathered on Columbus Circle. (Photo by Ira L. Black/Corbis via Getty Images)”n”n”n

Brown, of Color of Change PAC, said this 12 months’s election might be crucial in determining “the growth of Black communities across the country” and that recent revelations about Trump’s intentions if re-elected must be a “wake-up call to voters.”

“Not only for progressives to organize with a deeper understanding of what the Trump administration means for our movement, but also for those voters who have never cast a blue ballot,” he said.

“This report further demonstrates that the Trump White House cannot be accountable to our communities,” Brown added. “A huge part of the strength of our racial justice movement is our ability to guide policymakers toward reform policies and hold them accountable for impeding justice for Black people. This will not be possible if Trump’s white supremacist platform is given another term.”

The Biden-Harris campaign has found itself at odds with Trump’s projected agenda to roll back equity policies within the federal government.

“He is making it clear that if he wins in November, he will turn his racist past into official government policy, gutting programs that provide economic opportunities for communities of color and make life harder for Black and brown people,” said former U.S. Rep. Cedric Richmond, a co-chair of the Biden campaign -Harris.

“Already, his Project 2025 allies have blocked billions of dollars in support for women and minority-owned businesses, and if he wins a second term, they will take their divisive agenda even further. Our job is to stop him.”

!function(){var g=window;g.googletag=g.googletag||{},g.googletag.cmd=g.googletag.cmd||(),g.googletag.cmd.push(function(){ g.googletag.pubads().setTargeting(“has-recommended-video”,”true”)})}();var _bp=_bp||();_bp.push({“div”:”Brid_1569752″, “obj”:{“id”:”41122″,”width”:”1280″,”height”:”720″,”stickyDirection”:”below”,”video”:”1569752″,”slide_inposition”:” .widget_tpd_ad_widget_sticky”}});

Featured Stories

The post Critics Warn Black Voters of Trump’s ‘Anti-White Racism’ Agenda If Re-elected appeared first on TheGrio.

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Alabama Grandma Beaten and Killed by Cops – New FBI Documents Revealed Proposing Closure for Black Family After Decades

Published

on

By

Cold Case Records Describe Horrific Murder of Black Woman by Law Enforcement Officers Over Alleged Untaxed Whiskey in 1945, Providing Family with Closure

It was March 23, 1945, when 4 white cops entered Hattie DeBardelaben’s estate in Alabama, accusing her of manufacturing and selling untaxed whiskey.

The 46-12 months-old black mother of seven denied the allegations and consented to police searching her property.

However, law enforcement officials killed her by punching her repeatedly and breaking her neck in front of her 15-12 months-old son, who was arrested for attempting to defend his mother.

Court records describe the horrific murder of a black woman by law enforcement officers over alleged untaxed whiskey in 1945, leading to family closure
Mary and Dan DeBardelaben (left and right), whose grandmother Hattie DeBardelaben (center) was murdered by law enforcement officers in 1945, were ultimately locked up after the federal government released documents referring to the murder and cover-up about their grandmother. (Photos: Facebook and National Archives and Records Administration)

However, an FBI investigation conducted on the request of the NAACP concluded that she died of a heart attack and closed the case several months later. One of the cops involved in her death, Clyde Smith, later became sheriff of Autauga County.

The case remained secret for many years until last month, when the National Archives and Records Administration released 69 pages of documents from a Cold Case Civil Rights Records Act investigation signed by President Donald Trump in 2019.

The pending case of Hattie DeBardelaben was the primary set of records released under the act, providing closure for the victim’s grandchildren, whose parents never told how their grandmother died.

“I cried for days because I couldn’t believe what happened to my grandmother,” said 74-12 months-old Mary DeBardelaben AL.com.

“It was a cover-up,” said her brother, Dan DeBardelaben CNN. “That is exactly what happened – these documents clearly show that.”

The documents, which may be read here, here and here, make clear the horrific law enforcement murder case and the resulting government cover-up that, unfortunately, still continues.

“Hattie DeBardelaben’s name may not be familiar to most people, but her death at the hands of law enforcement officers in 1945 was sadly typical of the violence – and even death – that many black Americans experienced in the Jim Crow South.” – Margaret Burnham, co-chair of the National Security Review Board Civil Rights in preparatory proceedings, said the statement.

“Although federal agents investigated her death on the time, the perpetrators were never dropped at justice. “We hope, however, that the release of these recordings after so many years will provide some answers for her descendants, and at the same time shed light on a dark chapter in our nation’s history.”

Murder

Clyde White, who was an Autauga County sheriff’s deputy on the time, told the FBI that he had received complaints that DeBardelaben was selling illegal whiskey, so he contacted agents of the federal Alcohol Tax Unit, which was the forerunner of today’s Alcohol, Tobacco, and Federal Drug Enforcement Administration. firearms and explosives.

White said he drove as much as the DeBardelaben farm with three ATU agents: John H. Barrenbrugge, J.C. Moseley and L.O. Smith.

White said they only found a quart of whiskey and a couple of empty jugs of stinking whiskey, and decided to arrest her for the whiskey and Edward for interfering with arrest, although he didn’t describe exactly how the boy interfered beyond saying “these white sons of bitches don’t they’ll search this house.

White told FBI agents that they never hit DeBardelaben or her son and nephew and that DeBardelaben walked to the automotive without limping or complaining.

He also claimed that DeBardelaben died suddenly within the backseat of a automotive as they were driving to the Platville County Jail.

However, DeBardelaben’s 15-12 months-old son, Edward Lewis Underwood, gave a really different version of events to the FBI, telling investigators that he had just returned home from school when law enforcement officers stopped on the family farm within the countryside near Selma and asked his mother if she had some whiskey for sale.

He said his mother told officers she did not have the whiskey and that they may search the home although they did not have a warrant.

But then her 16-12 months-old nephew, James Callier, got here home from school and the officers ordered him to sit down on the bottom, but he didn’t seem to listen to them, so considered one of the officers walked as much as him and punched him, prompting Callier to take the seat next to Underwood.

“Leave him alone. She’s going to come back home,” DeBardelaben told police in defense of her nephew, which led to her beating and death.

Edward described a terrifying scene by which the identical policeman who had punched his cousin walked as much as his mother and punched her, knocking her down and causing her to fall onto a pot of boiling water she was using for laundry.

She tried to stand up, but then two ATU agents hit her again, causing her to fall onto a pot of boiling water.

“She stood up again and they each hit her again. This time she fell to her knees, keeping each hands on the bottom.

The agents then lifted her off the bottom and placed her in a chair, where she remained speechless, “panting and grunting like a person whose breath had been cut off.”

Edward said he called his two older brothers who were working within the fields to come back to the home, Johnnie and Bennie DeBardelaban, but after they approached the home, two cops pulled out their guns and ordered them to the bottom while the opposite two cops dragged them mother to the automotive, placing her within the backseat with Edward.

As they drove, Hattie begged the boys to stop and let her drink water from a close-by stream, but they ignored her request and continued driving.

She then began vomiting, so that they stopped the automotive and let her vomit on the side of the road. When she finished vomiting, Edward pulled her back into the automotive and they continued driving, but then she passed out.

They stopped the automotive again and White went to the stream, filled a bottle with water and let her son wipe her face and let her drink, but she was already dying.

“He’s my baby,” were her last words in reference to Edward, her youngest son, who was trying his hardest to assist his mother.

When they arrived at Plattville Jail, she was already dead, so that they locked Edward in a cell and contacted local undertakers to take his mother’s body to the funeral home.

Concealment

Dan Albright, a black undertaker at a neighborhood funeral home in Platville, told the FBI that the sheriff contacted him about collecting the body from the jail around 6:30 p.m. that evening. Albright said her body was still within the back seat of the police automotive and that she was “foaming from her mouth and nose, just like a boar’s foaming.”

He also said the sheriff contacted Dr. James Tankersley, who examined her body while it was still within the squad automotive and determined she had died of a heart attack despite signs of a broken neck.

“The only thing I noticed that was different from the other bodies was that every time we lifted the body, the head fell back,” Albright told investigators. “I didn’t tell the doctor anything in regards to the neck. After examination, the doctor concluded that she died of heart problems.

That evening, at Edward’s request, one other black undertaker, Fred Williams, picked up the body from the unique funeral home in Plattville and transported it to his funeral home in Selma, where the subsequent morning he examined it and determined that she had not died from a broken neck, but he reached this conclusion without performing a neck dissection.

He also emphasized that greater than 12 hours had passed since she was killed and rigor mortis had occurred, which might make it inconceivable to make a full determination.

According to A Medical examination from 2016it’s inconceivable to totally determine whether a neck fracture has occurred without performing a neck autopsy, concluding the next:

According to 1 researcher, rigor mortis, or the stiffening of muscles after death, affects the neck inside hours of death, peaking after 12 hours. Medical examination 2023.

The FBI also interviewed DeBardelaben’s doctor, a white man named J. S. Chisholm, who had treated her for 10 years, and told investigators that her health had all the time been high quality until a few month earlier, when she began complaining of shortness of breath and swollen feet.

He said he diagnosed her with a heart murmur and said she could probably live a standard life, “but it was not unusual for a person in her condition to die suddenly, especially if subjected to any unusual strain or excitement.”

This was enough for investigators to shut the case on June 30, 1945, concluding that the cops had done nothing mistaken, and of their report they stated the next.

After reading the documents of Dan and Mary DeBardelaban, whose father was Bennie DeBardelaban, considered one of the young men working within the fields when their mother died, they finally understood why the family never told them how their grandmother died, even when she visited her growing up within the grave . All seven of her children have since died.

“You know, my dad and his brothers and cousins ​​witnessed what really happened,” Dan told AL.com.

“I’m sure this example was extremely traumatic for my father and was considered one of the the reason why he never said a word nor did he or his other six sisters and brothers seek advice from us about what happened. “

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Washington’s power has modified. Here’s how the ACA could change

Published

on

By

ACA, Trump ACA, Republicans ACA, Trump Obamacare, Republicans Obamacare, Medicare, Republicans Medicare, Medicare and Medicaid, Republicans Medicaid, Republican Congress, theGrio.com

Trump teased ACA overhaul; other Republican lawmakers have said changing the laws referred to as Obamacare can be a priority.

President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House could embolden Republicans who need to weaken or repeal the Affordable Care Act, but implementing such sweeping changes would still require overcoming procedural and political hurdles.

Trump, a longtime opponent of the ACA, expressed interest in changing the health law during the campaign. Additionally, some senior Republican lawmakers – who will now control each the House and Senate – have said changing the landmark 2010 laws referred to as Obamacare can be a priority. They argue that the law is simply too expensive and an overreach of the government’s powers.

The ruling trio is setting the stage for potentially seismic changes that could limit the expansion of Medicaid laws, raise uninsured rates, weaken patient protections and increase premium costs for hundreds of thousands of individuals.

“The Republicans’ plans — they don’t say they’re going to repeal the ACA, but their set of policies could amount to the same goal or worse,” said Sarah Lueck, vice chairman for health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities , a research and policy institute. “This can happen through legislation and regulation. We are ready for anything. It can take many forms.”

Over the years, Republicans in Congress have solid dozens of votes in an try and repeal the law. They didn’t accomplish that in 2017, when Trump became president, despite serving in each chambers and the White House, largely because some GOP lawmakers wouldn’t support laws they believed would cause such a marked increase in the uninsured rate .

Similar opposition to the amendment to the law may appear again, especially as polls show ACA protections are popular.

While neither Trump nor his GOP allies have detailed what they’d change, House Speaker Mike Johnson said last month that the A.C.A. needs “massive reform” and can be included in the party program if Trump wins.

Congress could theoretically amend the ACA and not using a single Democratic vote, using a process referred to as “reconciliation.” But the narrow margins by which Republicans control the House and Senate mean that only a handful of “no” votes could derail the effort.

Many of the more ambitious goals would require Congress. Some conservatives have called for changing the funding formula for Medicaid, the federal government’s medical health insurance program for low-income people and other people with disabilities. The idea could be to make use of budget reconciliation to get lawmakers to agree to cut back the share the federal government pays to the growing population. The group that will be most affected could be mostly higher-income adults and adults who do not need children, moderately than “traditional” Medicaid beneficiaries similar to pregnant women, children and other people with disabilities.

A conservative idea that will allow individuals to make use of ACA subsidies for exchange-traded plans that violate the health law would likely require Congress. This could encourage healthier people to make use of subsidies to purchase cheaper and stingier plans, raising premiums for older and sicker consumers who need more comprehensive coverage.

“This is like a plan to repeal the ACA,” said Cynthia Cox, vice chairman and director of the Affordable Care Act program at KFF, the nonprofit health information organization that owns KFF Health News. “It’s repeal by another name.”

Congress would likely be needed to pass a proposal to transfer a few of consumers’ ACA subsidies to health savings accounts to cover qualified medical expenses.

Trump could also decide to bypass Congress. He did so during his last term, when the Department of Health and Human Services invited states to use for waivers to change how they pay for Medicaid programs – limiting federal funds in exchange for greater state flexibility in running the program. Waivers are popular in each blue and red states as other changes to Medicaid are made.

“Trump will do whatever he thinks he can,” said Chris Edelson, an assistant professor of presidency at American University. “If he wants to do something, he’ll just do it.”

Republicans have an alternative choice to weaken the ACA: They simply cannot do anything. Temporary, increased subsidies that reduce the cost of premiums — and have contributed to the nation’s lowest-ever uninsured rate — will expire at the end of next 12 months without congressional motion. Then there could be contributions double or moreon average, for subsidized consumers from 12 states which have signed up for the federal ACA exchange – in accordance with KFF data.

This would mean fewer people could afford the costs of the ACA exchanges. And while the number of individuals covered by employer plans is prone to increase, it’s estimated that between 2024 and 2033 there can be a further 1.7 million uninsured people annually, in accordance with federal estimates.

Many of the states that will be hardest hit, including Texas and Florida, are represented in Congress by Republicans, which could prompt some lawmakers to think about ending the subsidies.

The Trump administration may determine to stop defending the law against lawsuits in search of to overturn parts of it. One of the most characteristic cases questions the ACA requirement for insurers to cover some preventive services totally free, similar to cancer screenings and alcohol use counseling. About 150 million people now profit from the coverage requirement.

If the Justice Department withdrew its petition after Trump took office, plaintiffs wouldn’t need to comply with the coverage requirement — which could trigger similar challenges with broader consequences. A recent Supreme Court ruling left the door open to legal challenges from other employers and insurers in search of the same relief, said Zachary Baron, director of Georgetown University’s Center for Health Policy and Law.

Meanwhile, Trump could initiate changes from his first day in the Oval Office through executive orders, i.e. directives which have the force of law.

“Early executive orders will give us an idea of ​​the policies the administration plans to pursue,” said Allison Orris, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “Early signaling through executive orders will send a message about what guidance, regulations and policies may follow.”

In fact, Trump relied heavily on these orders during his previous term: An October 2017 order directed federal agencies to start modifying the ACA and ultimately increased consumer access to health plans that were illegal. He could issue similar orders early in his latest term, using them to start the strategy of forcing changes in the law, similar to increased oversight of potential fraud.

The administration could take other steps early on that will conflict with the ACA, similar to limiting federal aid funding and helping people enroll in ACA plans. Both actions depressed registration during the previous Trump administration.

Trump could also use regulation to implement other conservative proposals, similar to expanding access to medical health insurance plans which can be inconsistent with ACA consumer protections.

The Biden administration has held back Trump’s efforts to expand so-called short-term health plans, disparaging the plans as “junk” insurance because they could not cover certain advantages and will refuse to cover individuals with pre-existing health problems.

The Trump administration is anticipated to make use of regulations to reverse Biden’s decision, allowing consumers to maintain and extend their plans for much longer.

But drafting the rules became rather more complicated after a Supreme Court ruling that said federal courts not needed to defer to federal agencies facing legal challenges to their authority. As a result, any Trump-era HHS rules may require greater efforts to dam them in the courts.

Some individuals with ACA plans say they’re concerned. Dylan Reed, a 43-year-old small business owner from Loveland, Colorado, remembers the pre-ACA days and doesn’t need to return to the days when insurance was difficult to get and he couldn’t afford.

In addition to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety, he suffers from scleroderma, an autoimmune disease related to: joint pain and numbness in the limbs. Even on the ACA plan, he estimates he pays about $1,000 a month for medications alone.

He worries that without the ACA’s protections, it can be difficult to seek out coverage for his pre-existing conditions.

“It’s definitely a scary thought,” Reed said. “I probably would have survived. I would just be in so much pain.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom dedicated to publishing in-depth journalism on health issues and is one among the predominant operating programs of KFF – an independent source of research, polls and journalism on health policy. Find out more about KFF.

!function(){var g=window;g.googletag=g.googletag||{},g.googletag.cmd=g.googletag.cmd||(),g.googletag.cmd.push(function(){ g.googletag.pubads().setTargeting(“film-recommended-film”,”true”)})}(); ( () => { ( ( cb ) => { window.tpd = window.tpd || {}; if ( true === tpd.cmpReady ) { console.log( ‘(TPD)(Brid) CMP was already ready, working player.’ ); cb(); } let tpdCmpReadyListener = () => { console.log( ‘(TPD)(Brid) Event ready for CMP began, running player.’ ); window.removeEventListener( ‘tpd:cmpCb’, tpdCmpReadyListener( ‘script’ ); s.src=”https://player.target-video.com/player/build/targetvideo.min.js”; s.async = true; let goal = document.getElementById( ‘Brid_21904’ ); goal ); window._bp = window._bp ||. {“div”:”Brid_21904″,”obj”:{“id”:”41122″,”width”:”1280″,”height”:”720″,”stickyDirection”:”below”,”playlist”: “21904”}} );

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Distraught mother of 13-year-old Texas boy who died on gymnasium floor – questions why school didn’t immediately get him help when he had trouble breathing

Published

on

By

A grieving family is questioning the actions of administrators at a Texas middle school where their son died after falling during basketball practice.

According to KTRKXavier Thompson died at Thornton Middle School in Katy on November 15. His mother said he suffered an asthma attack that day, and immediately after her son’s fall, they immediately received calls from concerned teammates.

“I had to call a panicked student who kept asking me what to do,” said 13-year-old Xavier’s mother, Brittany Thompson. “It saddens me that no one called 911 when they saw my baby was having trouble breathing.”

According to his family, 13-year-old Xavier Thompson died at Thornton Middle School in Katy, Texas, after an asthma attack. His parents said the school called them immediately, but not 911. (Photos: KTRK screenshot, Cypress Fairbanks Independent School District)

Xavier coaches also quickly contacted Thompson and her husband, and the couple insisted that they call emergency services to the school. The family also noticed that there was a hearth station right round the corner.

When Xavier’s father arrived at school, his son was not breathing. Family members claim that he was the one who resuscitated their son, however the actions taken didn’t bring him back to life.

Xavier’s mother said that just the day before his asthma attack, her son was dancing within the lounge, thrilled to make the school’s basketball team. The next day he died.

“I don’t understand,” said the Thompsons’ lawyer, George Powell. “Without medical personnel present, calling parents will not help anyone who has been injured or has some form of respiratory distress.”

The family told KTRK that Xavier had suffered from asthma his entire life, but his condition was well controlled. They established an motion plan regarding his condition with the Cypress Fairbanks Independent School District. The middle school also had two inhalers reserved for the teenager in case he needed medication.

“They have medical exams, we have medical insurance on file and they have all their emergency contacts,” Thompson said. “What’s the point if kids have to name it and say, ‘What do we do?’”

Thornton Middle School officials sent a letter to oldsters of all students notifying them of Xavier’s death and offering students counseling.

“I just want my son back. I’d give my life for him in a heartbeat. I’d go and breathe for him if I could,” Xavier’s mother said with tears in her eyes.

Xavier’s family said an autopsy was performed to find out the precise cause of death and is currently awaiting the outcomes.

A district spokesperson told KHOU 11 that Xavier’s death was asthma-related and there was no information on the medical treatment he received.

Another Houston-area family also experienced the same tragedy to the Thompsons three months ago when a student died at the center school.

Landon Payton collapsed and lost consciousness Aug. 14 at Marshall Middle School. Unlike young Xavier, the 14-12 months-old didn’t suffer from any breathing problems and was in good health, in response to his father, Alexis Payton.

Payton raised questions concerning the school’s response to Landon’s fall within the school gym after learning that the school nurse didn’t know how one can perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation or use the school’s automated external defibrillator (AED), a tool that emits an electrical shock to revive normal function. heart rhythm when someone suffers sudden cardiac arrest.

Two teachers’ unions later said the school’s defibrillator was defective or outdated.

A Southern California family can be questioning the moments surrounding the death of their 12-12 months-old son at middle school last 12 months. Yahshua Robinson collapsed during gymnastics practice at Canyon Lake Middle School during a heat wave when temperatures reached 107 degrees. Robinson’s parents learned that a teacher had told him to run away as punishment for wearing inappropriate clothes to class. His family says he collapsed at school and died of cardiac arrest.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending