Connect with us

Crime

Ahmaud Arbery’s killers want their hate crime convictions overturned

Published

on

ATLANTA (AP) – Attorneys are asking a U.S. Court of Appeals to overturn the hate crime convictions of three white men who used pickup trucks to chase Ahmaud Arbery through the streets of a county in Georgia before considered one of them killed the fleeing black man with a shotgun.

A panel of judges from the eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta was scheduled to listen to oral arguments Wednesday within the case that followed nationwide protests over Arbery’s death. Lawyers for the white men argue that evidence of racist comments they’ve made prior to now doesn’t prove racist intent to harm.

Advertisement

On February 23, 2020, father and son Greg and Travis McMichael armed themselves with guns and chased Arbery after they spotted a 25-year-old man running through their neighborhood outside the port city of Brunswick. A neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, joined the chase in his own truck and recorded cellphone video of Travis McMichael shooting Arbery on the street.

More than two months passed with no arrests until Bryan’s graphic video of the killing was leaked onto the Internet and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation took over the case from local police. Charges were soon filed.

All three men were sentenced in a Georgia state court in late 2021.

In legal documents filed ahead of the appeals court hearings, lawyers for Greg McMichael and Bryan cited prosecutors’ use of greater than two dozen social media posts and text messages, in addition to witness statements, showing that every one three men used racial slurs or otherwise disparaged Black people.

Advertisement

Bryan’s attorney, Pete Theodocion, said Bryan’s past racist statements angered the jury while failing to prove that Arbery was prosecuted due to his race. According to AJ Balbo, Greg McMichael’s lawyer, Arbery was pursued since the three men wrongly suspected he was a fugitive.

Greg McMichael gave chase when Arbery ran past his house, saying he recognized a young black man from security footage that in previous months had shown him entering a neighboring house under construction. None of the videos showed him stealing, and Arbery was unarmed and had no stolen property when he was killed.

In written submissions, prosecutors said trial evidence showed “long-standing hatred and prejudice against black people” that influenced defendants to consider Arbery had committed crimes.

Featured Stories

Advertisement

In Travis McMichael’s appeal, attorney Amy Lee Copeland didn’t dispute the jury’s finding that he was motivated by racism. Social media evidence features a 2018 Facebook comment by Travis McMichael on a video of a black man pranking a white person. He used an expletive and a racial slur, writing: “I might kill it…. “

Instead, Copeland based her appeal on legal details. She said prosecutors didn’t prove that the streets of Satilla Shores County, where Arbery was killed, were public roads, as stated within the indictment used to charge the lads.

Copeland cited records from a 1958 meeting of Glynn County commissioners through which they refused to take the streets over to the district’s developer. During the trial, prosecutors relied on service request records and district official testimony to point out that district officials cared in regards to the streets.

Lawyers for the three also presented technical arguments for overturning their attempted kidnapping convictions. Prosecutors said the charge was warranted because the lads used pickup trucks to chop off Arbery from fleeing the realm.

Advertisement

Defense attorneys said the fees were improper because their clients weren’t attempting to capture Arbery for ransom or other advantage and the trucks weren’t getting used as a “tool of interstate commerce.” Both elements are required for attempted kidnapping to be a federal crime.

Prosecutors said other federal appellate districts have ruled that any automotive utilized in the hijacking qualifies as an instrument of interstate commerce. They also said that the profit the lads sought was “the satisfaction of their personal desires and the administration of vigilante justice.”

The trial judge sentenced each McMichaels to life in prison for the hate crimes and an extra sentence – 10 years for Travis McMichael and 7 years for his father – for brandishing a gun while committing violent crimes. Bryan received a lighter sentence for the hate crime of 35 years in prison, partly because he was unarmed and retained a cellphone video that became key evidence.

The three also received 20 years in prison for the attempted kidnapping, however the judge ordered that this time run concurrently with their hate crime sentences.

Advertisement

If either of the federal sentences is overturned by a U.S. appeals court, each the McMichaels and Bryan will remain in prison. All three are serving life sentences in Georgia state prisons for murder, and motions for a brand new state trial are pending before a judge.


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Advertisement

Crime

Family of Texas Teen, accused of a deadly stab of another teenager on the track, collected over $ 150,000 via the online fundraiser

Published

on

By

The collection of money for a teenager accused of a deadly stabbing of another teenager during a meeting at the Texas track last week has almost USD 200,000.

Launched by the family of Carmelo Anthony, a 17-year-old from Texas, who’s accused of stabbing Austin Metcalf, also 17, during an intensive meeting between them, Dajndo Fundraiser reached USD 160,000 from Monday morning.

According to Anthony’s lawyer, Deric Walpole, his client demands self -defense on this matter. Talking with NBC Dallas-Fort Worth On Friday, other than the prison, wherein Anthony was detained, Walpole said: “I know that my client said it was a self -defense. I have no reason not to believe it, but I have to develop facts, talk to people and find out what is happening before I made some statements about what I think.”

Advertisement

He added: “I have no reason to think that it was not a self -defense at the moment.”

On Wednesday, April 2, around 10 am local time, it’s claimed that Anthony stabbed Metcalf after Metcalf asked to depart a specific area during the rain delay at a sports event at the Kuykeyndall stadium in Frisco, in accordance with the NBC Dalls-Fort value. Anthony, a competitor in a competitive team, apparently sat under the tent of the Metcalf team to avoid rainfall when Metcalf asked him to depart. When Anthony didn’t follow Metcalf in order that he wouldn’t touch him, allegedly Metcalf caught Anthony’s arm, leaning Anthony, using a knife from a backpack to stab Metcalf in his chest from escaping.

Metcalf suffered a stinging wound in his heart and was recognized as deceased at the scene of the incident, despite the attempts to save lots of his twin brother.

“I put my hand on (his chest), tried to stop (bleeding), grabbed his head and looked into his eyes. I just saw his soul. And this also took my soul,” said Twin Hunter Metcalfa Fox News.

Advertisement
Harriet Tubman removed from the National Park Service website to

Anthony was arrested and accused of killing the first degree, and is currently being detained in the Collin County prison for a bond of USD 1,000,000, which his lawyer is trying to cut back. He hopes to interrogate bonds this week.

Teenager Apparently he said the police“It is not alleged, I did it” that he was lively in self -defense and asked if Metcalf can be tremendous. Anthony’s father said The New York Post That his son was “provoked”.

“He was not an aggressor. He was not the one who started him,” said Andrew Anthony, adding: “Everyone has already adopted their assumptions about my son, but he is not what they make him.”

He explained that his son was a “good child” who works two works and maintains 3.7 GPs.

“I feel sorry for other parents and family, and words cannot explain how both (families) affected this tragedy,” he noted.

Advertisement

The online collection of money causes “false” narratives circulating after the consequence.

“The widespread narrative is false, unfair and harmful. As a family of faith, we are deeply grateful for all your support in this difficult period. Your prayers and help mean more for us than ever,” we read a fundraiser.

Collecting money on Gofundme In the case of family costs and Metcalf’s funeral, they brought 95% of their goal.

NY Public Schools inform Trump's administration that they will not comply with the DEI order

(Tagstransate) news

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Crime

New research: Demlitization police departments do not increase crime

Published

on

By

New studies say that demilitarization police departments do not increase crime

Richmond, Virginia – June 12: photo of George Floyd expected to the statue of confederate general Robert Lee on June 12, 2020 in Richmond, Virginia. Last week, the governor of Virginia Ralph Northam ordered the removal of Lee’s general statue as soon as possible, but court proceedings temporarily stopped these plans. Protests proceed in cities across the country after the death of George Floyd, who died in police detention in Minneapolis on May 25. (Photo eze amos/getty images)

Advertisement

Giving police departments equipment to military class does not reduce crime or increase safety based on two independent research. Studies appear in the course of the ongoing conversation concerning the importance of “rejecting the police” as a method.

IN “Police demilitarization and brutal crime“, Kenneth Lwande, a professor on the University of Michigan, questioned the claim that the military weapon exchange program reduced the crime rate, assaulting police officers and the variety of complaints towards police officers.

Finding problems in previously published data Lwande focused on the information available after ordering the Obama administration from 2015, required to demlate local police agencies. Answering public indignation after exposing the militarized police in Ferguson, Obama’s administration Forbade some Sales of military equipment to the police as a part of the controversial program 1033. Trump’s administration reversed this policy in 2017.

Advertisement

IN interview In the case of ABC, Lwande explained that earlier research found that the transfer of military equipment to police plots served as deterrent. But from his evaluation, evidence does not confirm such conclusions. “It’s just not an accurate record,” said Lwande. “[Prior studies] They clearly suggested that by transferring military police equipment, he would stop criminals from committing crimes. “

Published in the character of human behavior, London magazine, research emphasizes the reaper of Trump’s administration on potentially “unbelievable” data when making decisions about withdrawing restrictions from Obama’s time. After assessing previous research, Lipowde found that publicly published data utilized in previous studies were filled with inaccuracies. Earlier evaluation did not control the equipment that was transferred between agencies, unused or otherwise inoperable. In addition, Lwande did not find any evidence that the demilitarizing law enforcement authorities led to an increase in crime.

Program 1033, managed by the Defense Logistics Agency, is one in every of several ways through which law enforcement authorities acquire military assessment equipment. Established in 1997 as a part of the Act on authorization for national defense, is estimated Program 1033 has transferred over $ 7 billion in military equipment into $ 8,000 across the country. The program was originally created for the forces of “counteracting terrorism”, but later prolonged to cover all of the activities of law enforcement agencies.

Covering with the national uprisings this summer, several members of the Chamber introduced laws to eliminate the 1033 program in June. The Black Lives movement also published Act Breathe Act, a comprehensive legislative proposal, including financing specific politicians and the abolition of the police. Section I of the proposed respiratory act requires the opening of the 1033 program in its entirety.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Crime

Article archive – essence Being

Published

on

By

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement


This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending