Connect with us

Technology

Apple’s iPhone is not a monopoly like Windows was a monopoly

Published

on

The U.S. Department of Justice and attorneys general from 16 states and the District of Columbia sued Apple this morning in federal court for violating antitrust laws. The lawsuit alleged that the corporate has a monopoly within the premium smartphone market and uses a number of illegal tactics to perpetuate this monopoly.

Leaving aside the main points of this tactic and its legality (should you’re interested, you possibly can read all the lawsuit here) the case has many similarities to the Justice Department’s antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft from the Nineteen Nineties, which I wrote about on the web site Microsoft Tips from 2000 to 2010. Even Attorney General Merrick Garland noted these similarities, saying: “The landmark Microsoft case found the monopolist liable under antitrust laws for using its market power to undermine technologies that would make it easier for users to choose a different computer operating system.” Today’s grievance alleges that Apple used lots of the same tactics that Microsoft used.

However, there is one fundamental difference between these cases: Microsoft had a clear monopoly within the relevant marketplace for PC operating systems. Apple’s monopoly position is not so clear.

Advertisement

Having a monopoly is not illegal, Garland noted at her news conference. However, it is illegal to make use of certain tactics to perpetuate or maintain this monopoly – but to prove this, it have to be proven that the defendant has sufficient market power to exclude competitors from the market.

Microsoft Windows had well over 90% of the relevant market share for notebook computer operating systems. In fact, it was so dominant within the pre-smartphone era Goldman Sachs estimates In 2000, Microsoft operating systems were reportedly installed on 97% of all computing devices.

Although the actual end result of the Microsoft antitrust case might be described as a mixed victory for the Justice Department, with lots of the penalties – including dissolving Microsoft into two corporations – being thrown out on appeal, the factual findings on this case clearly established that Microsoft had monopoly power. This paved the way in which for a series of personal lawsuits, which Microsoft has mostly ended.

Looking purely numerically, Apple’s market share is much lower.

Advertisement

In its lawsuit, the Justice Department argues that Apple has greater than 70% of the U.S. smartphone market, if revenue is counted. This is different than measuring by units shipped – based on statistics from the last quarter of 2023, Apple’s share is closer to 64% counterpoint research, well ahead of second-place Samsung with 18%. But the Justice Department argues that there are other indicators that support the iPhone’s dominance, corresponding to the undeniable fact that most young users select iPhones over Samsung phones running Google’s Android operating system. Households with higher demographics are also keen to decide on the iPhone.

The government also argues that the United States is an appropriate market, amongst other things, because most consumers buy smartphones through carriers and since potential latest market entrants must comply with U.S. telecommunications regulations, amongst other things. This argument is essential because Apple’s market share worldwide is much lower (only 23%, with Samsung second with 16%). In first place is the “Other” item, which mainly includes low-cost Android phones. It is clearly still a fragmented global market, which actually changes the competitive dynamics – developers have a significant incentive to create applications for Android, for instance. Contrast this with Microsoft’s market dominance, which was global – there was almost no real alternative on the time.

A key section within the Justice Department case begins on page 66, titled “Apple Has Monopoly Power in the Smartphone and Performance Smartphone Market.” The argument comes all the way down to barriers to entry.

First, the Justice Department argues that the majority people have already got a smartphone and are purchasing a latest one, and since most of those users have already got an iPhone, they usually tend to select one other iPhone. The Justice Department says Apple has introduced many artificial barriers to vary, corresponding to the difference between blue and green messaging bubbles for iPhone and Android phone users and allegedly limiting the functionality of third-party cross-platform video apps, somewhat than directing people to FaceTime. which only works on Apple products. If users change, they’ll incur costs and difficulties corresponding to learning a latest interface, purchasing latest applications, transferring data, etc.

Advertisement

Second, the DOJ cites a whole list of technical barriers to entry, corresponding to ordering expensive components, designing sophisticated hardware and software, securing distribution agreements, etc. There is also a variety of circumstantial evidence, corresponding to Apple’s huge and sustained profit margins on iPhone sales.

These arguments may prove convincing to the judge presiding over the case. However, on the subject of barriers to entry, Apple could argue that product differentiation and integration is not the identical as foreclosing competitors. A totally integrated platform with built-in apps for specific features corresponding to web browsing and video conferencing is easy and convenient, and customers select and proceed to decide on it because they like it, not because they’d like to modify to Android and are blocked by artificial barriers.

In the second case, Apple could point to the big investments it has made during the last 15 years in constructing these supply chains and relationships with carriers and developers, and rightly ask why it ought to be penalized now for doing the mandatory work to construct a lead.

This is often the case in antitrust cases within the tech world. An innovator rises to the highest through a combination of exertions, luck, and difficult business tactics. They construct an undeniable advantage largely because of network effects. Competitors complain. Governments are intervening. A dominant player stays in business long enough that latest competitors find a technique to enter the market – much as Apple and Google did against Microsoft within the 2000s, when their smartphone operating systems made desktop computers and Windows less essential.

Advertisement

And then the cycle starts again.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Advertisement

Technology

The signal is the number one application in the Netherlands. But why?

Published

on

By

Signal

The application signal for sending a privacy -oriented message flew high in Dutch application stores last month, often sitting at the top as the most steadily downloaded free application for iOS and Android in all categories, for data from many application tracking platforms akin to the sensor tower.

The application has experienced popularity over the years, often in response to Changes in politics in rivals akin to WhatsApp Or Geopolitical events. This is because Signal has set a reputation as a more friendly privacy option-it is served by the non-profit foundation (though based in the USA), not a personal company focused on data earning data. In addition, the signal tracks minimal metadata.

In 2025, along with the recent US president, who strengthened the warm Big Tech hug, it is not surprising that digital privacy tools have a moment – especially in Europe, which attracted the anger of President Trump.

Advertisement

But this time, the meaning of the signal in one very specific place-Holandia is particularly eye-catching.

Signal data from the sensor towerImage loans:Sensor tower / screenshot

IN Interview with Dutch newspaper de Telelegraaf last week, President signal Meredith Whittaker He noticed that the number of “new registrations” in the Netherlands was 25 this 12 months, even though it is not clear what the exact comparative period for this data is.

Asked why the Netherlands recorded such development, Whittaker pointed to the combination of things: “growing awareness of privacy, distrust of large technology and political reality in which people realize how sensitive digital communication can be,” said Whittaker.

Data provided to TechCrunch from the application intelligence company Appfigures Increase in Signal Signal in the Netherlands. According to its data, the signal was 365. Among the applications apart from the iPhone in the Netherlands on January 1 and didn’t appear on the list of the most significant general applications. Then, from around January 5, he began to climb the rankings, reaching the highest position until February 2.

Advertisement

The signal immersed and comes out of the lead during weeks, spending around mid -February at the top – including every single day from February 22. By digging deeper into the data, the AppFigures estimates that the total download in Apple and Google Applets in total in December 2024 jumped to 99,000 in January and increased to 233,000 to February – 958%.

While a part of this height could be assigned to a lower saturation signal than other markets, a continuing application position at the top in comparison with neighboring markets of comparable size.

“No other markets are approaching the Netherlands in terms of growth between December and February,” said AppFigures Techcrunch.

For comparison, from December in Belgium, download increased by over 250%, Sweden by 153%and dishes by 95%.

Advertisement

So why the signal can experience what one redditor called “The moment of mass adoption“In the Netherlands?

Clear signal

Give ZengerSenior Policy Advisor at Dutch Digital Rights Foundation Fragments of freedomHe said that even though it is difficult to point one specific reason, he is not surprised.

The last changes in the US have seen Large platform suppliers Adapt with the recent Trump administration, and this has retained a major public and media debate. Relying Europe from the technology of big private American corporations has turn out to be the point of interest of this debate.

“The Dutch are, like many others, very dependent on the infrastructure provided by extremely dominant technology companies, mainly from the USA,” said Zenger. “What does this mean, and the risk that results from it has been nicely demonstrated in the last few weeks. As a result, the public debate in the Netherlands was relatively sharp. Where in the past this problem was discussed only at the level “:” I feel that we are now conducting a debate at the higher levels: “.

Advertisement

In this context, society can mix dominance with data protection abuse. Since corporations akin to meta are frequently studied and fined in the field of information privacy practices, the signal could appear to be less evil: it is based on the US, but supported by a non-profit organization, which ensures encryption of each the content of the message and around it.

Vincent BöhreDirector of the Dutch Organization of Privacy Privacy firstHe also pointed to increased media relationships and a wider change of public opinion.

“Since a few months ago he was re-elected in the United States, in the Dutch-and European media, which seem to support Trump, there were many” Elon) Muska. “Articles criticizing X (previously Twitter) and Meta appear everywhere in the Dutch media, which leads to a change in Dutch public opinion: even people who have never really known or cared for privacy and security in social media, suddenly became interested in” friendly privacy “alternative, in particular the signal.”

Signal of intentions

President of the application for sending a signal message Meredith Whittaker.
President Signa Meredith Whittaker on Web Summit, in Lisbon on November 4, 2022.Image loans:Patricia de Melo Moreira / AFP / Getty Images

While the Netherlands is only one market of 18 million people in the European population over 700 million, its increase in adoption can signal a wider trend throughout the continent, especially when governments try to cut back privacy barriers.

For example, Apple has recently pulled out comprehensive encryption from iCloud in Great Britain to counteract government efforts to put in a backdoor.

Advertisement

Speech Fr. Rightcon 25 In Taiwan, this week, Whittaker confirmed the unwavering Signal attitude regarding privacy.

“Signal position on this subject is very clear- we will not walk, falsify or otherwise disturb the solid guarantees of privacy and security that people rely on” Said Whittaker. “Regardless of whether this disturbance or backdoor is called scanning on the client’s side or removing the protection of encryption against one or the other, the features similar to what Apple has been forced to do in Great Britain”

Separately, in Interview with Swedish public broadcaster, Whittaker said that Signal wouldn’t follow the proposed Swedish law requiring application to send messages for storage.

“In practice, this means asking us to break encryption, which is the basis of our entire activity,” said Whittaker. “Asking us to store data would undermine all our architecture and we would never do it. We would prefer to completely leave the Swedish market. “

Advertisement

TechCrunch contacted to signal a comment, but he didn’t hear during the publication.

(Tagstotranslat) signal of the Netherlands

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Gayle King announces participation in the space mission of all women

Published

on

By

Gayle King, CBS News, new deal, morning show

Gayle King will join the thirty first Blue Origin civil flight into space.


Gayle King announced that he was going to space. The host of the talk show during the day provided messages CBS MORNINGS.

King revealed Her participation in the thirty first Blue Origin flights, NS-31. Before discussing the details of the mission, she and her co -lecturers presented the video editing, which described her long -term fascination with travel travel.

Advertisement

In one clip, King said: “I am excited to watch the premiere at home in my pajamas.”

Her enthusiasm led to an invite with Blue Origin. The television personality will disappear from Crew from the whole familyIncluding an award -winning journalist Lauren Sánchez, award -winning Grammy singer Katy Perry and astronaut Aish Bowe.

Soon the explorer of the space admitted that she was hesitating at first.

“I don’t know how to explain at the same time terrified and excited,” said King.

Advertisement

To make a choice, King turned to a gaggle of family members, including her children and a detailed friend, Oprah Winfrey. She said that when her most trusted confidants approved, she was ready.

“When Kirby, Will and Oprah were fine, I was fine,” said King. “I thought Oprah would say no. She said: “I feel that when you don’t do it, if you all come back and also you had the opportunity to do it, you’ll kick.” She is right. “

King is not going to be the first television host who wandered into space with blue origin. In 2021, then-Good morning America Coheat Michael Strahan took part in the third civil flight Blue Origin. The former NFL star and the sender was delighted after returning, expressing how this experience gave him a brand new “perspective” in the world.

“I want to come back,” said Strahan.

Advertisement

Blue origin, Founded by Amazon Billionaire Jeff Bezos in 2000 is a non-public aviation company that focuses on sharing space travels for civilians and developing technology to explore the space long.

The upcoming flight of the king New Shepard It will probably be part of Blue Origin’s constant efforts to normalize civil space travel.


Advertisement
This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Instagram can turn the rollers in a separate application

Published

on

By

Instagram

Meta is occupied with an independent application for brief movies, Information He informed, citing an anonymous source, which he heard the boss on Instagram Adam Mosseri talked about the personnel project.

The project is reportedly called RAY code, which goals to enhance recommendations for brand new users and existing users in the US and to conclude one other three minutes of movies, the report quoted the source.

The finish line didn’t answer immediately at the request for comment.

Advertisement

Last month, the company announced a video editing application called Edyta to compete with Capcut (belonging to Tiktok Matter Company Bytedance) since it was geared toward using the uncertain future Tiktok and Bytedance in the USA

Currently, the Instagram channel is a mixture of photos, movies (drums) and stories. However, many users imagine that the application has been cluttered since it incorporates movies and not persist with the roots as an application for sharing photos. If the company rotates in an independent application for brief movies, it can create a possibility for Instagram to emphasise other functions.

Instagram began at the starting of this yr paying creators To promote Instagram on other platforms, resembling Tiktok, Snapchat and YouTube. Apparently he also began to supply Big money for the creators Present only on roller skates.

(Tagstranslate) Instagram

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending