Connect with us

Politics and Current

Medicaid offices raid deceased homes to recover medical costs

Published

on

WASHINGTON (AP) – As Salvatore LoGrande battled cancer and all of the pain that comes with it, his daughters promised to keep him within the white house with the pitched roof that he worked so hard for many years ago.

So Sandy LoGrande thought it was a mistake when, a 12 months after her father’s death, Massachusetts billed her $177,000 for her father’s Medicaid expenses and threatened to sue over his house if she didn’t pay up quickly.

“Home was everything,” LoGrande, 57, told her father.

But the bill and its accompanying threat weren’t a mistake.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services constructing, April 5, 2009, in Washington, DC. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

Rather, it was a part of a routine process the federal government requires of each state: recovering money from the estates of deceased individuals who, of their final years, relied on Medicaid, taxpayer-funded medical insurance for the poorest Americans.

An individual’s home is often exempt from qualifying for Medicaid. However, it’s subject to the estate recovery process for people who find themselves 55 or older and used Medicaid to pay for long-term care, similar to a nursing home stay or home health care.

This month, Democratic MP proposed completely abandoning the “cruel” program. Critics say this system collects too little – about 1% – of the greater than $150 billion in Medicaid spends annually for long-term care. They also claim that many states don’t warn individuals who join for Medicaid that their families could face large bills and claims on their estate after their death.

LoGrande says she became involved in a two-year legal dispute with Massachusetts after her father’s death. Just a few years before his death in 2016, she turned to an area nonprofit for advice on caring for her elderly father. The group suggested she enroll him in Medicaid. She even remembers asking a couple of home, but was assured that the state would only search for a house if it sent her father to a nursing home.

“He would never sign a contract for something that would put his home in danger,” she said.

For years, her father received an annual notice of profit renewal from the state’s Medicaid office. She says it wasn’t until after his death, when a state claim for $177,000 got here in, that she saw the primary bill for his care, which included a brief hospital stay for cancer pain, medications and hospice.

“That just blew my guts,” LoGrande said. “It was unfair.”

In 2019, the state reached an agreement with LoGrandes and withdrew its claims on the home.

State policies regarding this recovery process vary greatly, according to the 2021 Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission Reportwhich makes policy recommendations to Congress.

Some states place a lien – a right – on your private home, while others don’t. Meanwhile, some Medicaid offices try to recover all medical costs from patients, similar to doctor visits or prescriptions, while others simply recover long-term care costs. In recent years, Alaska and Arizona have foreclosed on just dozens of properties, while other states are foreclosing on 1000’s of homes price tons of of tens of millions of dollars.

New York and Ohio led the nation in such collections, recovering a complete of over $100 million in a single 12 months, Dayton Daily News investigation found.

Some investigation for the Kansas program, released Tuesday by the Health and Human Services Inspector General, found that this system was profitable – it brought in $37 million and only $5 million was spent recovering the cash. However, the state didn’t all the time collect money from eligible estates.

Last month, a foundation from one among the medical insurance industry’s largest giants called on Massachusetts to change its process for collecting reimbursements for many Medicaid costs, going beyond the federal government’s minimum requirements for recovering long-term care expenses. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation of Massachusetts has really useful that the state legislature pass a bill that will prohibit such additional collections.

Featured Stories

Wealth recovery “can perpetuate wealth disparities and intergenerational poverty,” said Katherine Howitt, director of Medicaid policy at the muse.

In Tennessee, which recovered greater than $38.2 million from greater than 8,100 estates last 12 months, Imani Mfalme found herself in an identical situation after her mother died in 2021.

As her mother’s early-onset Alzheimer’s disease progressed, Mfalme continued to take care of her. But in 2015, when Mfalme was diagnosed with breast cancer and required a double mastectomy, she began to consider other options. She arranged a gathering at her mother’s house with the local Medicaid office. The representative told her to empty her mother’s bank accounts – money that Mfalme had transferred to her mother as a part of her assisted living payments – in order that her mother would qualify for this system.

She recalls feeling somewhat offended through the meeting when the representative asked her thrice, “This is your mother’s house?” The representative, Mfalme said, failed to mention that after her death, she may be forced to sell the home to settle her mother’s Medicaid bills.

Currently, Tennessee’s Medicaid office says she owes $225,000, and the state is looking for a court order requiring Mfalme to sell the home to repay the debt.

Imani Mfalme poses for a portrait outside her late mother’s home, Thursday, March 7, 2024, in Knoxville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Caitie McMekin)

Mfalme, now 42, said she wants to pay what she will, however the home is a selected problem. Her mother, a black woman, bought her dream home in Knoxville after she won a landmark discrimination lawsuit against her former employer, Boeing, for paying her lower than her colleagues.

“She fought hard for equal pay and equal rights. “Just seeing it torn away just because she was sick and I was sick is just devastating,” Mfalme said of her mother.

TennCare, Tennessee’s Medicaid office, said in an email to the Associated Press that it could not comment on specific cases.

A report by the Commission on Payments and Access to Medicaid and CHIP really useful that Congress repeal a 1993 law that required states to recoup money from estates, as a substitute making it optional.

Earlier this month, Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois reintroduced laws that will have ended the mandate of the federal government. Schakowsky believes the rule is a lose-lose proposition for families who hand over their homes and taxpayers who don’t see much profit from recovery efforts.

“This is one of the most cruel and ineffective programs we see,” Schakowsky told the AP. “It’s a program that doesn’t work for anyone.”

In a deadlocked Congress, with some Republicans calling for limits on Medicaid eligibility, the bill is unlikely to gain the bipartisan support needed to change into law.

There is a minimum of one one who admits this rule doesn’t work: the person who created it.

Many people do not know in regards to the decades-old order, which was intended to encourage people to save for long-term care – otherwise they risk losing the equity of their home, explained Stephen Moses, who now works for the conservative Paragon Health Institute.

“The plan was to provide long-term care options for people who need long-term care, but you have to plan ahead to be able to pay privately so you don’t end up in a public health care program,” Moses said.


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Trump says he cannot guarantee that tariffs will not raise prices in the US and does not rule out retaliation

Published

on

By

Donald Trump, Donald Trump Meet The Press, Trump tariffs, Will tariffs raise prices, Trump immigration policy, Trump abortion, Trump health care, Trump revenge prosecutions, theGrio.com

WASHINGTON (AP) – Donald Trump he said he couldn’t guarantee that his promised rates regarding key US foreign trade partners there will be no raise prices for American consumers and again suggested that some political rivals and federal officials who handled court cases against him must be imprisoned.

The president-elect also touched on monetary policy, immigration, abortion and health care, and U.S. involvement in Ukraine, Israel and elsewhere in a wide-ranging interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that aired Sunday.

Trump often mixed declarations with reservations, at one point warning that “everything is changing.”

Take a have a look at a few of the issues covered:

Trump wonders whether trade penalties could raise prices

Trump threatened widespread trade penalties but said he didn’t imagine it economists’ predictions that the additional costs of imported goods for U.S. businesses would result in higher domestic prices for consumers. He broke his promise that American households would not pay more for purchases.

“I can not guarantee anything. “I can’t guarantee tomorrow,” Trump said, apparently opening the door to accepting the reality that import fees typically operate once goods reach the retail market.

That’s a special approach from Trump’s typical speeches during the 2024 campaign, when he presented his decisions as a surefire approach to curb inflation.

In the interview, Trump defended the tariffs in general, saying the tariffs “make us rich.”

He announced that on the first day of his term in January he would impose a 25% tariff on all goods imported from Mexico and Canada unless those countries satisfactorily stop illegal immigration and the flow of illegal drugs equivalent to fentanyl into the United States. He also threatened to impose tariffs on China to force the country to limit fentanyl production.

“I just want to have a level, fast but fair playing field,” Trump said.

Trump suggests revenge against his opponents without claiming to have an interest in revenge

He has made conflicting statements about how he would approach justice after winning the election, although he was convicted of 34 felonies in a New York state court and charged in other cases with handling national security secrets and efforts to overturn his loss to a Democrat in 2020 Joe Biden.

“Frankly, they should go to jail,” Trump said of members of Congress who investigated the Capitol riot by his supporters who wanted him to remain in power.

The president-elect has emphasized his case that he could use the justice system against others, including special counsel Jack Smith, who prosecuted the case involving Trump’s role in the siege on January 6, 2021. Trump confirmed his plan to pardon convicted supporters for the role they played in the riot, saying that he will take these actions on his first day in office.

As for the idea of ​​revenge triggering potential criminal prosecutions, Trump said: “I actually have every right to accomplish that. I’m a top law enforcement officer, you recognize that. I’m the president. But that doesn’t interest me.”

At the same time, Trump named lawmakers on the House special committee that investigated the rebel, citing Rep. Bennie Thompson, R-Mississippi, and former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo.

“Cheney was behind this… as was Bennie Thompson and everyone on this committee,” Trump said.

Asked specifically whether he would direct his administration to pursue the cases, he replied “No” and suggested he did not expect the FBI to quickly investigate his political enemies.

But at one other point, Trump said he would go away the issue to Pam Bondi, his pick for attorney general. “I want her to do whatever she wants,” he said.

Many leading Democrats have taken such threats, no matter Trump’s inconsistencies, seriously enough that Biden is considering issuing a blanket, preventive pardon to guard key members of his outgoing administration.

Trump appeared to backtrack on his campaign rhetoric calling for an investigation into Biden, saying, “I have no intention of going back to the past.”

Swift motion is coming on immigration

Trump has repeatedly mentioned his guarantees to seal the U.S.-Mexico border and deport tens of millions of people who find themselves in the U.S. illegally as a part of a mass deportation program.

“I think you have to do this,” he said.

He has suggested that he would try to make use of executive motion to finish “birthright” citizenship, under which individuals born in the U.S. are considered residents – although such protections are provided for in the Constitution.

Asked specifically about the future of people that were delivered to the country illegally as children and have been protected against deportation in recent years, Trump said: “I want to work something out,” indicating he may look to Congress for an answer.

But Trump also said he “don’t want to break up families” with mixed legal status, “so the only way not to break up the family is to keep them together and send them all away.”

Sweet news: Dark chocolate may be the secret to reducing your risk of developing type 2 diabetes

Trump commits to NATO, setting conditions, but criticizes Putin and Ukraine

Trump, long a critic of NATO members for not spending more on their very own defense, said he would “absolutely” remain in the alliance “if they pay their bills.”

Pressed on whether he would withdraw if he was dissatisfied with allies’ commitments, Trump said he wanted the United States to be treated “fairly” on trade and defense issues.

He wavered on NATO’s priority of containing Russia and President Vladimir Putin.

Trump suggested that Ukraine should prepare for less U.S. help to defend against Putin’s invasion. “Probably. Yeah, probably. Sure,” Trump said about Washington cutting aid to Ukraine. Separately, Trump did called for a right away ceasefire.

Asked about Putin, Trump initially said he had not spoken to the Russian leader since last month’s election, but then insisted: “I haven’t spoken to him lately.” Trump said under pressure, adding that he didn’t need to “impede negotiations.”

Trump says Powell is protected at the Fed, but Wray is not at the FBI

The president-elect has said he has no intention, at the least for now, of asking Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to step down before the end of Powell’s term in 2028. Trump said during the campaign that presidents must have more to say on Fed policyincluding rates of interest.

Trump has not provided any job guarantees to FBI Director Christopher Wray, whose term ends in 2027.

Asked about Wray, Trump said, “Well, it seems pretty obvious” that if the Senate confirms Kash Patel as Trump’s nominee select the head of the FBI, then “he’s going to take another person’s place, right? Someone is that this person you’re talking about.

Trump is absolute on Social Security, not abortion and medical insurance

Trump promised that the government’s efficiency efforts under Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would not threaten Social Security. “We do not affect social safety, except that we make it more effective,” he said. He added that “we’re not raising the age or anything like that.”

He didn’t speak in much detail about abortion or the long-promised amendment to the Affordable Care Act.

On abortion, Trump continued its inconsistencies and said he “probably” won’t try to limit access to abortion pills, which currently cause most abortions, in keeping with the Guttmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights. But when pressed on whether he would commit to the position, Trump replied: “Well, I agree. That is, do things change. I think they are changing.”

A repetition of his line Debate on September 10 v. Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump again stated that he had “concepts” for a plan to switch the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which he called “lousy health care.”

He added that any version of Trump would supply insurance coverage for Americans with pre-existing health conditions. He did not explain how such a project would differ from the establishment or the way it could fulfill his desire for “better health care for less money.”

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

St. Day Louis Marks Wesley Bell in honor of the first black prosecutor

Published

on

By

Wesley Bell, St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney


December 6 in St. Louis has officially been declared Wesley Bell Day to honor the county’s first black prosecutor.

According to Local leaders held a celebratory event at the St. County Department of Justice. Louis, after which County Executive Sam Page made a press release. Bell made history along with his appointment to this position, which he has held since 2019.

He called the recognition “a great honor” that belongs to the community he serves.

“For me, this is a testament to the men and women of the St. County Prosecutor’s Office. Louis, who wake up every day with the idea of ​​public safety, with the idea of ​​treating our victims with the dignity and respect they deserve, and keeping this region safe. In this way, it is a great honor for us,” he said.

Bell took over as St. County prosecutor. Louis after defeating longtime Democratic incumbent Bob McCulloch in the primary. After McCulloch’s controversial decision to not prosecute the officer who fatally shot Black teenager Michael Brown in 2014, Bell ran a campaign that prioritized criminal justice reform. His platform included community policing and progressive marijuana policies that were passed shortly after taking office.

During his tenure, Bell established the Diversion Commission and the Incident Review Unit. The unit enables people wrongly convicted to submit a request to the prosecutor to reconsider their case. Bell sees the measure, a first in the nation, as a step toward criminal justice reform.

But Bell will transcend local politics to assist his St. Louis on a national scale. He was recently elected to the United States House of Representatives, representing Missouri’s 1st District.

“This job, and my future job, is about work,” he added. “It’s about representing the interests of my constituents. People here in this region.

Although Bell will proceed to serve St. Louis in a distinct capability, the race to appoint his successor continues, and the escalating dispute between Page and Missouri Gov. Mike Parson continues. Page has already announced his selection of the next prosecutor, but the GOP leader said he plans to make the nomination.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

68-year-old black Georgia man knocked to the ground and brutally arrested at a red light fights for justice after three-year legal nightmare

Published

on

By

Black Man Thrown to Ground and Arrested during Minor Traffic Stop is Finally Going to Trial – Three Years After His Arrest

It’s taken greater than three years, but Jeffrey Lemon finally got his day in court.

A 68-year-old Black man was arrested in Georgia under questionable circumstances in 2021 after Clayton County sheriff’s deputies threw him to the ground and put a knee on his back after he was accused of running a red light in suburban Atlanta County.

He was charged with obstruction and red light violations, in addition to possession of a small amount of marijuana, which police present in a pipe in the trunk of his automobile after his arrest. He ended up spending two nights in jail.

A Black man thrown to the ground and arrested during a minor traffic stop will finally face justice - three years after his arrest
Jeffrey Lemon (left) was brutally arrested in 2021 by Georgia State Sheriff’s Deputy Jon House (right) after stating that he was falsely accused of running a red light. It was over three years before he was given the likelihood to prove his innocence in court, and only because his lawyer filed a motion for a speedy trial. (Photo: Jeffrey Lemon and Facebook)

But the case dragged on for greater than three years until his attorney filed a motion for a speedy trial last month. The trial is scheduled to start Monday, and Lemon hopes prosecutors will drop the case without forcing a trial.

“I hope they throw everything away, but it’s a corrupt system, so I don’t know what to expect,” Lemon told Atlanta Black Star in a phone interview.

Lemon also said he was offered a plea deal late Thursday wherein prosecutors would drop the marijuana and red light charges if he pleaded guilty to the obstruction charge, but he declined to take the deal because he plans to file a lawsuit if he’s cleared of all charges. .

Arresting deputies Jon House and Demetrius Valentine each resigned after the incident, but House, who initiated the traffic stop, was rehired three months later.

“The arrogance I experienced from Officer J. House and Sgt. Valentine… completely disregarded me as a human being,” he wrote in a letter wherein he presented his version of the arrest.

Lemon’s arrest got here a month after the death of Clayton County Sheriff Victor Hill was accused faces federal charges after he was accused of tying pretrial detainees to a restraint chair for hours in violation of their civil rights. Hill was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in prison in March 2023, but he was released after serving lower than a 12 months.

Throughout this time, nonetheless, Lemon’s case has remained pending, which he believes is because the officers try to cover up their illegal behavior and prevent him from filing a lawsuit.

Arrest

The incident occurred on May 27, 2021, when Lemon was driving his Camaro on Valley Hill Road and noticed a Clayton County sheriff’s deputy behind him, who turned out to be House.

He stated that he was in the left inside lane and needed to enter the right outside lane to make a right turn in front of him, nonetheless, when he stopped his automobile at a red light, the deputy pulled the patrol automobile next to him into the right lane.

He said the deputy then refused to move forward when the light turned green, stopping Lemon from entering the lane.

Lemon said he waited a few seconds, hoping the deputy would move, but then moved to the next intersection when it became clear the deputy was not going to move.

He testified that when he turned right at the next intersection, the light turned green, but the deputy stopped him and accused him of running a red light.

Lemon told the deputy that he didn’t run the red light, but gave him his license, but the deputy began accusing him of trying to avoid him, and that is when he realized the deputy was trying to escalate the interaction, and as he tried to call his daughter and friend, but he didn’t. they replied.

He then called 911 because he feared for his life when the deputy began accusing him of things he didn’t do, and that is when House called for backup.

Valentine arrived and threatened to taser him if he didn’t get out of the automobile, so he complied under duress, which occurred when Valentine tackled him to the ground and House put his knee on his neck.

“I felt humiliated,” he said. “For the guy to come up and not try to have any dialogue. He just immediately walked up and said, “Get your ass on the ground before I kick you.”

He said that when he was arrested, he was on his way to rent a latest house, so he had $1,800 in money with him, but authorities didn’t allow him to use the money to bail, forcing him to stay in jail for two days.

“They didn’t want to take the money, so I had to carry it in my shoe throughout my stay in prison,” he said.

He said the aggressive arrest put him in a state of so-called cervical stenosis, where he’s currently in constant pain and has already spent hundreds of dollars on medical bills.

Report

The House deputy describes the arrest in a very different light, stating in his report that he became suspicious when Lemon failed to stop at the intersection after the light turned green, believing he was doing all the pieces in his power to avoid being stopped.

He further claimed that as Lemon moved forward, turning right, he ran a red light and that is when House stopped him.

However, this claim contradicts his initial claim because if Lemon was truly trying to avoid being stopped, he would never have run a red light knowing the deputy was behind him.

House also claimed that he began to fear for his life after he noticed a knife in the center console of Lemon’s vehicle and then called for backup and ordered him out of the automobile, but Lemon stated that the knife was never there.

“There was no knife,” Lemon said. “I would like to see their list of things they faraway from my automobile. This will show there was no knife.

House stated in his report that he found pot in the trunk while taking a listing of things in the automobile, which he ordered confiscated. He also claimed that “evidence was dropped in the sheriff’s office room,” but didn’t specifically mention the alleged knife placed in the room.

Valentine resigned two weeks later without explanation, according to personnel records obtained by Atlanta Black Star. He was then hired by the nearby Fairburn, Georgia Police Department the following month.

Personnel records obtained from the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office show House resigned in November 2021 because he was dissatisfied with “a change in the mission of this agency that does not align with my personal goals.”

House was then hired by the nearby Riverdale Police Department, only to resign from the job three months later because “the city-provided health insurance is expensive and does not provide adequate health care for my family,” according to a resignation letter obtained by Atlanta. Black Star.

He was then rehired by the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office in March 2022 and stays employed.

Lemon believes there may be body camera and dash cam video that might prove his innocence, but when Atlanta Black Star asked public authorities for any available footage of the arrest, the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office said “no records exist” ” regarding arrest.

“That sounds like another lie,” Lemon said.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending