Negotiators from Iran and the United States are set Meet again in Oman on April 262025 New nuclear agreement.
The planned talks follow Two previous rounds of indirect negotiations which took place under the new administration of Trump. It was considered that these discussions gave sufficient progress to deserve Sending nuclear experts on each side to start out of the details of the potential framework of the contract.
Development is particularly noteworthy, considering that Trump in 2018 unilaterally The USA has passed away From a multilateral agreement with Iran. This agreement, negotiated during the presidency of Obama, imposes restrictions in Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for relief in sanctions. Instead, Trump turned to the policy that Tightening financial screws About Iran through improved sanctions Issuing hidden military threats.
But this approach didn’t disrupt the Iran nuclear program.
Now, as a substitute of reviving Policy of maximum pressure From his first term Trump – at all times being perceived as a trader – he gave his team green light for the renovated diplomacy, and even Apparently he rejectedFor now, Israel’s desire to introduce military strikes against Tehran.
Jaw-sparkles over the war
Turn to diplomacy, Iran’s relations return to the place where Obama began during the Obama administration, with attempts to encourage Iran to limit or eliminate his ability to enrich uranium.
Only this time the US left the previous contract in 2018, Iran was seven years old Improve the enrichment and spare capability rather more uranium than allowed by an abandoned agreement.
As long -term Expert in the field of US foreign policy and nuclear real estateI imagine that Trump has a novel opportunity not only to restore an identical nuclear agreement with the one he rejected, but in addition to conclude a more covering contract – and support higher relations with the Islamic Republic.
Alireza/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
There are real signs that potential The transaction can be able toIt is actually true that Trump likes the optics of making transactions.
But the agreement is in no way certain. All progress towards the contract will be questioned by quite a lot of aspects Internal divisions and opposition As a part of the Trump administration and skepticism amongst some in the Islamic Republic, together with Uncertainty about the plan of succession for the aging Ayatollah Chhamenei.
Conservative hawks are still abundant in each countries and can still deraise any softening of diplomatic tensions.
Checkered diplomatic past
There are also many years of distrust to overcome.
It is not enough to say that the United States and Iran had a decent relationship because it has been from time Iranian Revolution from 1979 AND takeover of the US embassy in Tehran In the same 12 months.
Many Iranians would say that relations have been tense since 1953, when the US and Great Britain organized overthrow Mohammad MossadeghDemocratically elected Prime Minister Iran.
Washington and Tehran haven’t had formal diplomatic relations since 1979, and each countries were closed in many years for influence in the Middle East. Today, tensions remain high over the Iranian support for the so -called resistance axis towards the West, and particularly the US interests in the Middle East. This axis includes Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Houthi in Yemen.
For his part, Tehran has long been invading American hegemony in the region, including his strong support for Israel and his history of military activities. In recent years, that motion in the US has covered direct assaults on Iranian assets and staff. In particular, Tehran is still bad at 2020 The murder of Qass SoleimaniHead of the strength of QDS Islamic Corps of the Revolutionary Guard.
Standing at the top of those various disputes, Iran’s nuclear ambitions turned out to be a everlasting source of competition for the United States and Israel, with the latter the only nuclear energy in the region.
The perspective of warmer relations between two sides appeared for the first time during the Obama administration – though Iran sounded Bush administration in 2003 only to be rejected.
American diplomats began to make contact with Iranian counterparts in 2009 met with the Iranian negotiator in Geneva. The so -called P5+1 began direct negotiations with Iran in 2013. This paved the way to the final iran nuclear agreement, or Common comprehensive motion plan (JCPOA), in 2015. In this agreement – ended by the USA, Iran, China, Russia and lots of European nations – Iran He agreed to restrictions on his nuclear programIn this level limit, which could be enriched with uranium, which was limited to what’s going to be obligatory for nuclear weapons. In return, the US multilateral and bilateral sanctions were removed.
Many observers perceived this as a win, with restrictions in developing nuclear energy together with the hope that greater economic involvement with the international community, which can alleviate a few of the more provocative behaviors in foreign policy in Iran.
However, Israel and Saudi Arabia were frightened that the contract didn’t completely eliminate Iran’s ability to enrich uranium and right -wing critics In the United States, it complained that this didn’t apply to ballistic missiles in Iran or support for groups of fighters in the region.

Mario Tama/Getty Images
When Trump took office for the first time in 2016, he and his foreign policy team committed himself Reverse Obama’s course and shut the door on each diplomatic hole. Extraction of your promise, Trump He withdrew unilaterally US support for JCPOA despite Iran’s constant compliance with the terms of the contract and restored sanctions.
Donald, a trader?
So what has modified? Well, just a few things.
While Trump’s withdrawal from JCPOA was welcomed by Republicans, it did nothing to stop Iran from increasing his ability to enrich uranium.
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia, willing to transform the image and economic diversification, Now it supports the contract This was objected to Obama’s administration.
In this second term of Trump Antiranous pulses They are still there. But despite his military option rhetoric, if the contract was not concluded, Trump repeatedly stated his opposition to the US involvement in one other war in the Middle East.
In addition, Iran has suffered many blows in recent times, which made him more isolated in the region. Iranians are Hamas and Hezbollah seriously weakened consequently of Israel’s military actions. Meanwhile, Strikes in Iran by Israel They showed the potential range of Israeli missiles – and the apparent readiness of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to use them. In addition Removal of President Bashar Al-Assad in Syria He deprived Iran with one other regional ally.
Tehran is also fighting more fragile domestic economy than during negotiations for JCPOA.
Because Iran weakened regionally, and Trump’s major goal is China, diplomatic avenue with Iran seems completely in step with Trump’s view as a trader.
The contract is not given
With two rounds of meetings and transition to more technical facets It seems that a possible agreement negotiated by experts has a reliable window of diplomacy.
This may mean a new contract that retains the basic facets of the previously abandoned contract. I’m not convinced that the new contract will look different than the previous aspect of enrichment.
However, there are still many potential blockades of roads standing on the road to every potential contract.
As in the case of Trump’s meeting with North Korea leader Kim Jong-Un during his first term, the president seems to be less fascinated with details than the spectacle. Although the American leader was amazing to meet his Korean counterpart, no politics modified for this reason.
As for Iran and other problems, the president shows Little patience for sophisticated Politics details. Complication of matters is that the US administration is expressed in intensive factionismWith many Iran Hawks, who would apparently be contrary to the contract – including the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and national security advisor Mike Waltz. They could rub The newly confirmed Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby AND JD Vance Vice PresidentThey each in the past were in favor of a more pro-diagram line on Iran.
How it became a typical topic in the foreign policy of Trump’s administration – even with its own allies in matters reminiscent of trade – it is not clear what Trump’s administrative policy is and whether there is a political commitment to conduct any final contract.
TOP Trump’s foreign negotiator Steve Witkoff, who has No national security experienceHe illustrated this tension. The task to negotiate with Iran, Witkoff has already been forced to accomplish that Come back His claim that the US was only trying to limit the level of enriching uranium and never eliminate the entire program.
For his part, Iran proved that he was seriously approaching diplomacy, he had previously accepted Barack Obama “Elongated hand. “
But Tehran is unlikely to capitulate basic interests or allow yourself to humiliate by the terms of any contract.
Ultimately, the major query to watch is whether the contract with Iran is to be concluded by pragmatics – after which to what extent narrow or expansive – or derailed by Hawks in administration.