Connect with us

Health and Wellness

we have the technology that will turn them from enemies into friends

Published

on

Ultra-processed foods are the latest dietary villain, related to several diseases of the modern world, from obesity to heart disease. However, many nutritionists doubt whether the term “ultra-processed” has another meaning cause confusion. It only takes into account how food is produced, ignoring other essential aspects reminiscent of calories and nutrients.

My job suggests that quite than being seen as an issue, ultra-processed foods may very well be a part of the solution. Thanks to advances in food science, we have the technology to create low-calorie, nutritious and cheap processed foods.

There is not any consensus on how ultra-processed foods ought to be defined. However, a nutrition and public health researcher has proposed a typical approach: Carlos Monteiro. He coined the term about 15 years ago to define foods that have undergone significant industrial processing and sometimes contain many added ingredients. In Portugal, ultra-processed food accounts for roughly 10%. average food planwhile in Germany it’s 46%, in Great Britain 50% and in the USA 76%.

Ultra-processed foods have three principal benefits – they’re low cost, convenient and frequently taste good. Their affordability is especially essential.

Mass production of food lowers costs. For example, the Heinz factory in Wigan is the largest baked bean factory in the world. It produces 3 million cans of baked beans per day, making them widely available and reasonably priced.

In 1961, scientists at Chorleywood in Hertfordshire developed a brand new way of baking bread. Currently, over 80% of loaves of bread in the UK are produced in this fashion. These loaves are softer, last more and price lower than traditional bread.

What’s higher than sliced ​​bread?
Clynt Garnham Food and Drink/Alamy

The affordability of ultra-processed foods makes them a staple for many individuals, especially dieters lower income. As in the area 30% of youngsters in the UK live in poverty, calls to remove such foods from diets must take into account how poorer families will find a way to afford brisker and more nutritious food. Today’s ultra-processed foods may not provide a perfect food plan, but they supply calories when money is tight.



Convenience is one other notable good thing about ultra-processed foods. Preparing meals from scratch might be time-consuming and involve purchasing ingredients, cooking, and cleansing up afterwards. Ultra-processed foods are a shortcut solution that saves you useful time. This is very essential for folks who attempt to reconcile work and family life. For individuals who lead a busy lifestyle and work long hours, time is a luxury that ultra-processed foods might help regain.

Finally, ultra-processed foods are purported to be tasty. We are genetically inclined to be interested in sweet and fatty foods. Pleasant taste is one among the reasons we select our foods.

This convenience, affordability and taste come at a price, nevertheless, as ultra-processed foods are sometimes high in sugar, salt and saturated fat and lacking in fruits, vegetables and essential nutrients.

Is all ultra-processed food harmful to us?

It’s not all the time clear whether it’s the “ultra-processed” nature of those foods or their high calorie and low nutrient content that causes health problems. Nutrition is more complex than simply considering how food is processed. We also need to contemplate calories, fiber, vitamins, minerals and other essential nutrients.

For example during baked beans they’re considered ultra-processed, in addition they have a variety of fiber – which is commonly the case lost from the British food plan – low in fat and calories and a superb source of plant protein.

Inside the world’s largest baked bean factory in Wigan.

Some research suggests that lots of the health problems related to ultra-processed foods, reminiscent of obesity and diabetes, could also be attributable to excessive caloric intake quite than the processing itself. When people surrender ultra-processed foods, they often eat fewer calories, which can explain the health advantages they experience.

The link between ultra-processed foods and poverty suggests that lots of the health problems related to ultra-processed foods could also be as a result of aspects related to poverty itself. Poor nutrition is commonly just a part of a much bigger picture that includes limited access to health care, higher stress levels and fewer opportunities for physical activity – all of which might contribute to poor health.

Can ultra-computing be used for good?

Ultraprocessing has been utilized in the UK to fortify food for many years. For example Bread and Flour Regulations 1998 requires the addition of certain nutrients reminiscent of calcium, iron, thiamine (vitamin B1), and niacin (vitamin B3) to any non-whole wheat flour. This reinforcement plays a crucial role in public health, That roughly 35% of the intake of calcium, 31% of iron and 31% of thiamine in the average UK food plan. Without these added nutrients, the risk of deficiency would increase.

In 2022, the UK government took the next step by imposing a requirement folic acid add to flour. This was an effort to forestall birth defects reminiscent of spina bifida, through which a baby’s spine and spinal cord don’t develop properly in the mother’s womb, and anencephaly, through which a baby is born without a part of the brain and skull.

Breakfast cereals, often criticized for his or her sugar content, also can increase your intake essential nutrients reminiscent of vitamins B2, B12, folic acid and iron. Some experts would really like to introduce mandatory food fortification expanded much further.

Food scientists do discovering other ways to make healthier ultra-processed foods. One approach is to cut back the sugar content to present it a sweeter taste fasterwhich implies less sugar is required to realize the same taste.

Another is to make use of scientific techniques to extend speed salt is released from food. Likewise, it leads to a quicker taste, which results in less consumption.

Other innovations geared toward reducing food calories through reformulation include creating creamy, low-calorie dairy-free sauces or plant-based burgers that are virtually indistinguishable from their meat counterparts but have fewer calories.

This kind of innovation shows that ultra-processing doesn’t necessarily mean unhealthy and high-calorie food – it’s about the selections made during production. If scientists deal with creating reasonably priced, nutritious, ultra-processed foods, they will grow to be a part of the solution to the obesity crisis, not the enemy.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health and Wellness

Jury awarded $310 million to parents of teenager who died after falling on a ride at Florida amusement park – Essence

Published

on

By

Sun Sentinel/Getty Images

The family of Tire Sampson, the 14-yr-old who tragically died on an amusement park ride in Orlando, Florida, in 2022, has been awarded $310 million in a civil lawsuit.

Tire, who was visiting ICON Park along with his family on March 24, 2022, fell from the FreeFall drop tower. Although he was taken to a nearby hospital, he didn’t survive his injuries.

Now, greater than two years later, a jury has held the vehicle manufacturer, Austria-based Funtime Handels, responsible for the accident and awarded the Tire family $310 million. According to reports from local news stations WFTV AND KSDKthe jury reached its verdict after about an hour of deliberation.

Tyre’s parents will each receive $155 million, according to attorney spokesman Michael Haggard.

Attorneys Ben Crump and Natalie Jackson, who represented Tyre’s family, shared their thoughts on this landmark decision via X (formerly Twitter). “This ruling is a step forward in holding corporations accountable for the safety of their products,” they said in a statement.

Lawyers stressed that Tyre’s death was attributable to “gross negligence and a failure to put safety before profits.” They added that the ride’s manufacturer had “neglected its duty to protect passengers” and that the substantial award ensured it could “face the consequences of its decisions.”

Crump and Jackson said they hope the result will encourage change throughout the theme park industry. “We hope this will spur the entire industry to enforce more stringent safety measures,” they said. “Tire heritage will provide a safer future for drivers around the world.”

An investigation previously found that Tyre’s harness was locked through the descent, but he dislodged from his seat through the 430-foot fall when the magnets engaged. Tire’s death was ruled the result of “multiple injuries and trauma.”

ICON Park said at the time that it could “fully cooperate” with the authorities.

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Tireless HIV/AIDS advocate A. Cornelius Baker dies

Published

on

By

HIV/AIDS Advocate, A. Cornelius Baker


A. Cornelius Baker, a tireless advocate of HIV and AIDS testing, research and vaccination, died Nov. 8 at his home in Washington, D.C., of hypertensive, atherosclerotic heart problems, in response to his partner, Gregory Nevins.

As previously reported, Baker was an early supporter for people living with HIV and AIDS within the Nineteen Eighties, when misinformation and fear-mongering in regards to the disease were rampant.

According to Douglas M. Brooks, director of the Office of National AIDS Policy under President Obama, it was Baker’s Christian faith that guided him toward compassion for others.

“He was very kind, very warm and inclusive – his circles, both professional and personal, were the most diverse I have ever seen, and he was guided by his Christian values,” Brooks told the outlet. “His ferocity was on display when people were marginalized, rejected or forgotten.”

In 1995, when he was executive director of the National AIDS Association, Baker pushed for June 27 to be designated National HIV Testing Day.

In 2012, he later wrote on the web site of the Global Health Advisor for which he was a technical advisor that: “These efforts were intended to help reduce the stigma associated with HIV testing and normalize it as part of regular screening.”

https://twitter.com/NBJContheMove/status/1856725113967632663?s=19

Baker also feared that men like himself, black gay men, and other men from marginalized communities were disproportionately affected by HIV and AIDS.

Baker pressured the Clinton administration to incorporate black and Latino people in clinical drug trials, and in 1994 he pointedly told the Clinton administration that he was bored with hearing guarantees but seeing no motion.

According to Lambda Legal CEO Kevin Jennings, yes that daring attitude that defines Baker’s legacy in the world of ​​HIV/AIDS promotion.

“Cornelius was a legendary leader in the fight for equality for LGBTQ+ people and all people living with HIV,” Jennings said in a press release. “In the more than twenty years that I knew him, I was continually impressed not only by how effective he was as a leader, but also by how he managed to strike the balance between being fierce and kind at the same time. His loss is devastating.”

Jennings continued: “Cornelius’ leadership can’t be overstated. For many years, he was one in all the nation’s leading HIV/AIDS warriors, working locally, nationally and internationally. No matter where he went, he proudly supported the HIV/AIDS community from the Nineteen Eighties until his death, serving in various positions including the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Association of Persons with Disabilities AIDS, and the Whitman-Walker Clinic . Jennings explained.

Jennings concluded: “His career also included several honors, including being the first recipient of the American Foundation for AIDS Research Foundation’s organization-building Courage Award. Our communities have lost a pillar in Cornelius, and as we mourn his death, we will be forever grateful for his decades of service to the community.”

Kaye Hayes, deputy assistant secretary for communicable diseases and director of the Office of Infectious Diseases and HIV/AIDS Policy, in her comment about his legacy, she called Baker “the North Star.”.

“It is difficult to overstate the impact his loss had on public health, the HIV/AIDS community or the place he held in my heart personally,” Hayes told Hiv.gov. “He was pushing us, charging us, pulling us, pushing us. With his unwavering commitment to the HIV movement, he represented the north star, constructing coalitions across sectors and dealing with leaders across the political spectrum to deal with health disparities and advocate for access to HIV treatment and look after all. He said, “The work isn’t done, the charge is still there, move on – you know what you have to do.” It’s in my ear and in my heart in the case of this job.

Hayes added: “His death is a significant loss to the public health community and to the many others who benefited from Cornelius’ vigilance. His legacy will continue to inspire and motivate us all.”

Baker is survived by his mother, Shirley Baker; his partner Nevins, who can be senior counsel at Lambda Legal; his sisters Chandrika Baker, Nadine Wallace and Yavodka Bishop; in addition to his two brothers, Kareem and Roosevelt Dowdell; along with the larger HIV/AIDS advocacy community.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Health and Wellness

Bovaer is added to cow feed to reduce methane emissions. Does it pass into milk and meat? And is it harmful to humans?

Published

on

By

There are growing concerns in regards to the use of feed supplements, Bowar 10to reduce methane production in cows.

Bovaer 10 consists of silicon dioxide (mainly sand), propylene glycol (food stabilizer approved by Food Safety Australia New Zealand) and lively substance 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP).

There has been an enormous amount of misinformation in regards to the safety of 3-NOP, with some milk from herds fed this additive being labeled “Frankenmilk”. Others feared it could get to humans through beef.

The most significant thing is that 3-NOP is secure. Let’s clear up some major misconceptions.

Why do we want to limit methane production?

In our attempts to limit global warming, we’ve placed the best emphasis on CO₂ because the major man-made greenhouse gas. But methane is also a greenhouse gas, and although we produce less of it, it is: a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO₂.

Agriculture is the largest a man-made source of methane. As cattle herds expand to meet our growing demand for meat and milk, reducing methane production from cows is a vital way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

There are several ways to do that. Stopping bacteria within the stomachs of cows that produce methane one approach is to produce methane.

The methane produced by cows and sheep doesn’t come from the animals themselves, but from the microbes living of their digestive systems. 3-NO stop the enzymes that perform the last step of methane synthesis in these microorganisms.

3-NOP is not the one compound tested as a feed additive. Australian product based on seaweed, Rumin8for instance, it is also in development. Saponins, soap-like chemicals present in plants, and essential oils as well has been examined.

However, 3-NOP is currently one of the popular effective treatments.

Nitrooxypropanol structure: red balls are oxygen, gray carbon, blue nitrogen and white hydrogen.
PubChem

But is not it poison?

There are concerns on social media that Bovaer is “poisoning our food.”

But, as we are saying in toxicology, it’s the dose that makes the poison. For example, arsenic is deadly 2–20 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.

In contrast, 3-NOP was not lethal on the doses utilized in safety studies, up to 600 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight. At a dose of 100 mg per kg body weight in rats, it didn’t cause any adversarial effects.

What about reproductive issues?

The effect of 3-NOP on the reproductive organs has generated numerous commentary.

Studies in rats and cows showed that doses of 300–500 mg per kg body weight caused: contraction of the ovaries and testicles.

In comparison, to achieve the identical exposure in humans, a 70 kg human would want to eat 21–35 grams (about 2 tablespoons) of pure 3-NOP every day for a lot of weeks to see this effect.

No human will likely be exposed to this amount because 3-NOP doesn’t pass into milk – is fully metabolized within the cow’s intestines.

No cow will likely be exposed to these levels either.

The cow licks itself
Cows will not be exposed to levels tested on animals in laboratory studies.
Ground photo/Shutterstock

What about cancer?

3-NOP is not genotoxic or mutagenicwhich implies it cannot damage DNA. Thus, the results of 3-NOP are dose-limited, meaning that small doses will not be harmful, while very high doses are (unlike radiation where there is no secure dose).

Scientists found that at a dose of 300 mg per kilogram of body weight benign tumors of the small intestine of female ratsbut not male rats, after 2 years of every day consumption. At a dose of 100 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight, no tumors were observed.

Cows eat lower than 2 grams of Bovaer 10 per day (of which only 10% or 0.2 grams is 3-NOP). This is about 1,000 times lower than the appropriate every day intake 1 mg 3-NOP per kg body weight per day for a cow weighing 450 kg.

This level of consumption will likely be not the result in cancer or any of them other adversarial effects.

So how much are people exposed to?

Milk and meat consumers will likely be exposed to zero 3-NOP. 3-NOP doesn’t penetrate milk and meat: is completely metabolized within the cow’s intestines.

Farmers could also be exposed to small amounts of the feed additive, and industrial employees producing 3-NOP will potentially be exposed to larger amounts. Farmers and industrial employees already wear personal protective equipment to reduce exposure to other agricultural chemicals – and it is advisable to do that with Bovear 10 as well.

Milk
3-NOP doesn’t penetrate milk and meat.
Shutterstock

How widely has it been tested?

3-NOP has been in development for 15 years and has been subject to multiple reviews by European Food Safety Authority, UK Food Safety Authority AND others.

It has been extensively tested over months of exposure to cattle and has produced no unintended effects. Some studies actually say so improves the standard of milk and meat.

Bovaer was approved for use in dairy cattle by the European Union from 2022 and Japan in 2024. It is also utilized in many other countries, including: in beef products, amongst others Australia.

A really small amount of 3-NOP enters the environment (lower than 0.2% of the dose taken), no accumulates and is easily decomposed subsequently, it doesn’t pose a threat to the environment.

Since humans will not be exposed to 3-NOP through milk and meat, long-term exposure is not an issue.

What does Bill Gates have to do with this?

Bill Gates has invested in a distinct feed processing method for methane, Australian seaweed-based Rumin8. But he has nothing to do with Bovaer 10.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation awarded research grants to the corporate producing 3-NOP for malaria control researchnot for 3-NOP.

The bottom line is that adding 3-NOP to animal feed doesn’t pose any risk to consumers, animals or the environment.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending