Connect with us

Technology

How to Ask Google to Remove Deepfake Porn Search Results from Google Search

Published

on

How to ask Google to remove deepfake porn results from Google Search

The web is stuffed with deepfakes — most of them are nude photos.

According to report from Home Security Heroes, deepfake porn makes up 98% of all deepfake videos online. Thanks to easy-to-use and free generative AI tools, the variety of deepfakes online — a lot of that are involuntary — has skyrocketed by 550% from 2019 to 2023.

While laws banning unwanted deepfakes lag behind, a minimum of within the U.S., removing deepfakes is becoming increasingly easier thanks to latest tools in Google Search.

Google recently made changes to its search engine to combat deepfake porn, including changes to the search engine’s rating algorithm to reduce deepfake content in searches. The company also made accelerated way to consider your request to remove search results containing unwanted deepfake pornography content from your search engine.

Here’s how to use it.

Request to remove

The easiest method to request that Google remove deepfake pornography results without the user’s consent – a web site, image or video – is to use this web form. Notice that it’s separate form For child sexual abuse imagery, the goal content must meet Google’s criteria for removal as outlined below:

  • Contains nude, intimate, or sexual content (equivalent to photos or videos of you) and is distributed without permission; OR
  • Is false or falsely depicts you nude or in a sexually suggestive situation; OR
  • Falsely associates you or your name with sex work.

Click “Content contains nudity or sexual content” after which proceed to the subsequent page.

Image sources: Google

At this point, select “The content falsely depicts me in a sexual act or in an intimate state. (This is sometimes known as a “deep fake” or “fake pornography”):”

Removing deepfakes from Google Search
Image sources: Google

On the ultimate page of the shape, after entering your name, country of residence, and email address, you should indicate whether it’s you or another person depicted within the deepfake content that you just want removed. Google allows others to remove content on another person’s behalf, but provided that that person is an “authorized representative” who explains how they’ve that authority.

Removing deepfakes from Google Search
Image sources: Google

Next comes the content information section. Here, you’ll need to provide the URLs to the deepfake results you wish removed (up to 1,000), the URLs to the Google search results where the content appears (again, up to 1,000), and the search terms that return the deepfake. Finally, you’ll need to provide a number of screenshots of the content you’re reporting, in addition to any additional information that may help make clear the situation.

Steps after submitting your application

Once you submit your request, you’ll receive an automatic confirmation email. Your request will likely be reviewed, after which Google may ask for more information (equivalent to additional URLs). You will likely be notified of the motion taken, and in case your request doesn’t meet Google’s requirements for removal, you’ll receive a message explaining why.

Rejected applications could also be resubmitted with latest supporting materials.

Google says that when someone successfully requests the removal of deepfake porn leads to Search, the corporate’s systems can even try to filter out any explicit results from all similar searches involving that person. Additionally, Google says that when a picture is removed from Search in accordance with Google’s policies, its systems will scan — and take away — any duplicates of that image that it finds.

“These safeguards have already been proven effective against other types of unwanted images, and we’ve now developed the same capabilities for fake sexually explicit images,” Google said. I’m writing in a blog post. “These actions are intended to provide people with additional peace of mind, especially if they are concerned about similar content appearing about them in the future.”

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Flipkart co-founder Binny Bansal is leaving PhonePe’s board

Published

on

By

Flipkart co-founder Binny Bansal has stepped down three-quarters from PhonePe’s board after making an identical move on the e-commerce giant.

Bengaluru-based PhonePe said it has appointed Manish Sabharwal, executive director at recruitment and human resources firm Teamlease, as an independent director and chairman of the audit committee.

Bansal played a key role in Flipkart’s acquisition of PhonePe in 2016 and has since served on the fintech’s board. The Walmart-backed startup, which operates India’s hottest mobile payment app, spun off from Flipkart in 2022 and was valued at $12 billion in funding rounds that raised about $850 million last 12 months.

Bansal still holds about 1% of PhonePe. Neither party explained why they were leaving the board.

“I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Binny Bansal for being one of the first and staunchest supporters of PhonePe,” Sameer Nigam, co-founder and CEO of PhonePe, said in a press release. His lively involvement, strategic advice and private mentoring have profoundly enriched our discussions. We will miss Binny!”

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

The company is currently developing washing machines for humans

Published

on

By

Forget about cold baths. Washing machines for people may soon be a brand new solution.

According to at least one Japanese the oldest newspapersOsaka-based shower head maker Science has developed a cockpit-shaped device that fills with water when a bather sits on a seat in the center and measures an individual’s heart rate and other biological data using sensors to make sure the temperature is good. “It also projects images onto the inside of the transparent cover to make the person feel refreshed,” the power says.

The device, dubbed “Mirai Ningen Sentakuki” (the human washing machine of the longer term), may never go on sale. Indeed, for now the company’s plans are limited to the Osaka trade fair in April, where as much as eight people will have the option to experience a 15-minute “wash and dry” every day after first booking.

Apparently a version for home use is within the works.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Zepto raises another $350 million amid retail upheaval in India

Published

on

By

Zepto, snagging $1 billion in 90 days, projects 150% annual growth

Zepto has secured $350 million in latest financing, its third round of financing in six months, because the Indian high-speed trading startup strengthens its position against competitors ahead of a planned public offering next yr.

Indian family offices, high-net-worth individuals and asset manager Motilal Oswal invested in the round, maintaining Zepto’s $5 billion valuation. Motilal co-founder Raamdeo Agrawal, family offices Mankind Pharma, RP-Sanjiv Goenka, Cello, Haldiram’s, Sekhsaria and Kalyan, in addition to stars Amitabh Bachchan and Sachin Tendulkar are amongst those backing the brand new enterprise, which is India’s largest fully national primary round.

The funding push comes as Zepto rushes so as to add Indian investors to its capitalization table, with foreign ownership now exceeding two-thirds. TechCrunch first reported on the brand new round’s deliberations last month. The Mumbai-based startup has raised over $1.35 billion since June.

Fast commerce sales – delivering groceries and other items to customers’ doors in 10 minutes – will exceed $6 billion this yr in India. Morgan Stanley predicts that this market shall be value $42 billion by 2030, accounting for 18.4% of total e-commerce and a pair of.5% of retail sales. These strong growth prospects have forced established players including Flipkart, Myntra and Nykaa to cut back delivery times as they lose touch with specialized delivery apps.

While high-speed commerce has not taken off in many of the world, the model seems to work particularly well in India, where unorganized retail stores are ever-present.

High-speed trading platforms are creating “parallel trading for consumers seeking convenience” in India, Morgan Stanley wrote in a note this month.

Zepto and its rivals – Zomato-owned Blinkit, Swiggy-owned Instamart and Tata-owned BigBasket – currently operate on lower margins than traditional retail, and Morgan Stanley expects market leaders to realize contribution margins of 7-8% and adjusted EBITDA margins to greater than 5% by 2030. (Zepto currently spends about 35 million dollars monthly).

An investor presentation reviewed by TechCrunch shows that Zepto, which handles greater than 7 million total orders every day in greater than 17 cities, is heading in the right direction to realize annual sales of $2 billion. It anticipates 150% growth over the following 12 months, CEO Aadit Palicha told investors in August. The startup plans to go public in India next yr.

However, the rapid growth of high-speed trading has had a devastating impact on the mom-and-pop stores that dot hundreds of Indian cities, towns and villages.

According to the All India Federation of Consumer Products Distributors, about 200,000 local stores closed last yr, with 90,000 in major cities where high-speed trading is more prevalent.

The federation has warned that without regulatory intervention, more local shops shall be vulnerable to closure as fast trading platforms prioritize growth over sustainable practices.

Zepto said it has created job opportunities for tons of of hundreds of gig employees. “From day one, our vision has been to play a small role in nation building, create millions of jobs and offer better services to Indian consumers,” Palicha said in an announcement.

Regulatory challenges arise. Unless an e-commerce company is a majority shareholder of an Indian company or person, current regulations prevent it from operating on a listing model. Fast trading corporations don’t currently follow these rules.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending