In a breakthrough legal move, the three daughters of Malcolm X filed a lawsuit price $ 100 million against the CIA, FBI, the Department of Police in New York and other agencies, accusing them of the Civil Rights Leader who was contemporary in the cult.

The lawsuit, filed on Friday on the Federal Court in Manhattan, claims that these agencies not only knew in regards to the conspiracy geared toward killing Malcolm X, but in addition didn’t stop him, in accordance with Associated Press. The plaintiffs – along with Malcolm X property – claim that these powerful institutions played lively roles in his murder and conspired to hide their commitment.

A lawyer for civil rights, Ben Crump, known for his support in high -profile cases Through their predecessors and try to fix these historical harm. “

For a long time, the query of who was responsible for the death of Malcolm X appeared without many answers. A worshiped activist, born Malcolm Little in Omaha, Nebraska, and later often known as El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, was shot and killed on February 21, 1965 in the Audubon ballroom in Harlem. At the age of 39, his life was tragically shortened, turning to the group of fans.

While three men were initially convicted of his murder, two of them were released in 2021. After the brand new investigation revealed shaky evidence and dubious practices by law enforcement agencies. The family’s lawsuit now claims that the federal government deliberately suppressed key details in regards to the role of NYPD, FBI and CIA in the murder.

(*100*) we read in the lawsuit, the Shabazz family, including the widow of Malcolm, Betty Shabazz, endured pain, not knowing who was behind the story to take his life – or why they did it. They argue that the suffering of the family is a direct result of a deep and ongoing conspiracy to hide the reality.

“They did not know who murdered Malcolm X, why he was murdered, the level of NYPD, FBI and CIA orchestration or the identity of government agents who were conscious to ensure his death,” says the lawsuit. “The damage caused to the Shabazz family is unimaginable, huge and irreversible.”

Federal agencies mentioned in the lawsuit haven’t yet reacted publicly to legal proceedings, and the spokesman for the Department of Justice refused to comment, reports Associated Press.

The Tire Sampson family, a 14-12 months-old who tragically fell to death during a ride in the amusement park in Orlando, Florida in 2022, was awarded $ 310 million in a civil trial.

The tires, which visited Icon Park along with his family on March 24, 2022, fell out of the attractiveness of Freefall Drop Tower. Although he was taken to a close-by hospital, he didn’t survive his injuries.

Now, over two years later, the jury has aroused the Ride producer, Austria Punish Handels, responsible for the accident, granting the Tire family $ 310 million. According to reports from local information stations WFTV AND KSDKThe jury reached the verdict inside about the hour of the meeting.

According to the spokesman of the lawyer Michael Haggard, Tire’s parents will receive $ 155 million.

Lawyers Ben Crump and Natalie Jackson, who represented the Tire family, shared thoughts on a breakthrough decision through X (previously Twitter). “This verdict is a step forward in responsible corporations responsible for the safety of their products,” they said in an announcement.

Lawyers emphasized that Tire’s death was attributable to “gross neglect and lack of profit security priorities.” They added that the driving producer “neglected his duty to protect passengers”, and a big award ensures that “they will face the consequences of these decisions.”

Crump and Jackson expressed the hope that this result would encourage changes in the amusement park industry. “We hope that it serves as awakening the entire industry to enforce more severe security measures,” they said. “Tire’s heritage will be a safer future for riders around the world.”

The investigation previously revealed that the tire harness was closed at the time of riding, but slipped from the seat during the 430-meter drop when the magnets were involved. Tire’s death was recognized as the results of “many injuries and injuries.”

At that point, Icon Park said that “fully cooperates” with the authorities.

YesterdayBen Crump and Paul Napoli, nationally known civil rights and private injury lawyers, Ben Crump Law and Napoli Shkolnik, respectively, announced lawsuit on behalf of the National Council of Negro Women (NCNW) v. Johnson & Johnson.

The lawsuit was filed over the corporate’s targeted marketing of talc-based baby powder specifically to black women, despite known links to ovarian cancer. “The complaint calls for corrective action to inform Black women and all other consumers about the risks of the products and their link to ovarian cancer,” the agency says Atlanta Daytime World.

Founded in 1935 by Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune, NCNW mission “is to lead, support and empower women of African descent, their families and communities.” Many NCNW members staunchly used Johnson & Johnson powdered products, believing they were protected to use on themselves and their families.

Since at the least the Nineteen Eighties, some studies have shown that: to mix between using talc-based products and cancer. Regardless of this information, Johnson & Johnson deliberately selected to promote and advertise to black women as a vital a part of their business strategy. In fact, “Johnson & Johnson’s internal documents reveal the corporate’s intentions… The company’s 2009 marketing strategy noted that “the multicultural consumer [is] very essential to the business – need for retention” and expressed concern that “effectively retaining key consumers is becoming increasingly difficult” – within the criticism claims.

“This lawsuit affects the lives of our grandmothers, our mothers, our wives, sisters and daughters – all of whom were cynically targeted by Johnson and Johnson… All this time, the company’s management knew the risk of ovarian cancer associated with the use of talcum powder” – Crump he said. Co-counselor of Napoli he said Johnson & Johnson “puts profits over people by ignoring and concealing tons of research about risks.”

NCNW Executive Director Janice Mathis states “This company, through its words and images, told Black women that in our natural state we are offensive and that we must use their products to stay fresh… Generations of Black women believed them and made it our daily practice to use their products in ways that put us at risk cancer — and we taught our daughters the same. Shame on Johnson and Johnson.”