Technology
Elon Musk files for an injunction to halt OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit platform

Tech billionaire Elon Musk’s lawyers have filed searching for a preliminary injunction against OpenAI, several of its co-founders, and investor and shut associate Microsoft, to prevent OpenAI and other named defendants from engaging in conduct that Musk’s lawyer argues constitutes anti-competitive conduct.
The injunction request, filed late Friday within the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accuses OpenAI, its CEO Sam Altman, CEO Greg Brockman, Microsoft, LinkedIn co-founder and former OpenAI board member Reid Hoffman, and former OpenAI board and Microsoft Vice President Dee Templeton about various illegal activities – and tries to stop them. The allegations include:
- Discouraging investors from supporting OpenAI rivals like xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence company.
- Profiting from “illegally obtained confidential information” through OpenAI’s ties to Microsoft.
- Transforming OpenAI’s management structure into a for-profit organization and “transferring all tangible assets, including intellectual property owned, held or controlled by OpenAI, Inc., its subsidiaries or affiliates.”
- Requiring OpenAI to do business with organizations during which any defendant has a “material financial interest.”
Musk’s attorneys say he’ll suffer “irreparable harm” if the order shouldn’t be issued.
“Plaintiffs and society need a moment of rest,” they wrote within the lawsuit. “A mandate to preserve what remains of OpenAI’s non-profit nature, free from self-interest, is the only appropriate remedy. If not, OpenAI has promised Musk, and the public will be long gone by the time the court gets to the merits of the matter.”
The motion is the newest salvo in Musk’s legal battle with OpenAI, which at its core accuses the corporate of abandoning its original non-profit mission of constructing artificial intelligence research available to everyone. Musk he withdrew suit in July, only until bring it to life late this summer. Some corrected criticism earlier this month named recent defendants, including Microsoft, Hoffman and Templeton, and two recent plaintiffs: Shivon Zilis, a Neuralink executive and former OpenAI board member, and xAI.
Musk has argued in previous complaints that he was defrauded of greater than $44 million, which he says he gave to OpenAI, preying on his “well-known concerns about existential harm” related to artificial intelligence. Musk, certainly one of OpenAI’s co-founders, left the corporate in 2018 due to disagreements over its development direction.
OpenAI launched in 2015 as a nonprofit and transitioned to a limited-profit organization in 2019, with the nonprofit becoming the managing entity of the for-profit subsidiary. The company is within the means of transforming into a fully profit-oriented company apparently allow OpenAI to maintain its nonprofit status as a separate entity.
Musk created his answer to OpenAI, xAI, last yr. Shortly thereafter, the corporate released Grok, an artificial intelligence model that now powers many features on Musk’s social network X (formerly referred to as Twitter). xAI also offers an API that enables customers to embed Grok into third-party applications, platforms and services.
In the request for an injunction, Musk’s lawyers accuse OpenAI of depriving xAI of capital by obtaining guarantees from investors that they’ll not finance him and competitors. In October, the Financial Times. reported that OpenAI required investors in its latest funding round to refrain from financing any of OpenAI’s competitors, including xAI.
“Musk has verified that at least one large investor in OpenAI’s October funding round subsequently declined to invest in xAI,” a Musk adviser wrote.
Of course, xAI has had no trouble raising money recently. The startup reportedly closed a $5 billion round this month with participation from outstanding investors including Andreessen Horowitz and Fidelity. With a bank value of roughly $11 billion, xAI is one of the well-funded artificial intelligence firms on this planet.
Musk’s request for an injunction also alleges that Microsoft and OpenAI proceed to illegally share proprietary information and resources and that several defendants, including Altman, engage in self-interested interests that harm competition within the marketplace. For example, in its filing notes, OpenAI chosen Stripe, a payments platform during which Altman has a “significant financial interest,” as OpenAI’s payment processor. (Altman is claimed to have created billions from his Stripe estate.)
Microsoft, which first supported OpenAI in early 2019, has increased its partnership over the past few years, investing a total of ~$13 billion in exchange for an effective 49% share of the corporate’s profits. Microsoft has also allowed OpenAI to make extensive use of hardware resources within the cloud, allowing the startup to train, tune and run artificial intelligence models equivalent to those who support ChatGPT.
Hoffman’s position on the boards of Microsoft and OpenAI, in addition to a partner on the investment firm Greylock, gave Hoffman privileged insight into the businesses’ interests, Musk’s lawyers argue. (Hoffman stepped down from the OpenAI board in 2023.) As for Templeton, whom Microsoft briefly appointed a non-voting observer of OpenAI’s board, Musk’s lawyer claims she was able to facilitate agreements between Microsoft and OpenAI that may violate antitrust rules .
“Maintaining OpenAI’s charitable status pending final resolution and halting further proprietary trading by Altman protects both the organization’s founding mission and the public interest in the proper governance of charities,” Musk’s lawyers wrote.
Musk’s adviser wrote that if an injunction shouldn’t be granted, OpenAI may “lack sufficient funds” to pay damages if a court ultimately rules in Musk’s favor. (OpenAI is apparently spends over $5 billion and is nowhere near break-even). Moreover, they argue, if the judge had not allowed OpenAI to transition to a nonprofit organization, it might have been “virtually impossible” for the corporate’s deals to “grow forward” without “widespread investor losses” or should OpenAI proceed to accept recent investments.
“No objective observer can look at OpenAI today and say that it in any way resembles what it was intended to be,” Musk’s lawyers wrote. “Plaintiffs respectfully ask the court to maintain the status quo and halt defendants’ deteriorating conduct pending final judgment.”
In a statement, an OpenAI spokesperson said: “Elon’s fourth attempt, which again relies on the same baseless complaints, continues to be unsuccessful. completely without merit” The company had previously sought to dismiss Musk’s lawsuit, calling it “noisy” and baseless.
Technology
One of the last AI Google models is worse in terms of safety

The recently released Google AI model is worse in some security tests than its predecessor, in line with the company’s internal comparative test.
IN Technical report Google, published this week, reveals that his Flash Gemini 2.5 model is more likely that he generates a text that violates its security guidelines than Gemini 2.0 Flash. In two indicators “text security for text” and “image security to the text”, Flash Gemini 2.5 will withdraw 4.1% and 9.6% respectively.
Text safety for the text measures how often the model violates Google guidelines, making an allowance for the prompt, while image security to the text assesses how close the model adheres to those boundaries after displaying the monitors using the image. Both tests are automated, not supervised by man.
In an e-mail, Google spokesman confirmed that Gemini 2.5 Flash “performs worse in terms of text safety for text and image.”
These surprising comparative results appear when AI is passing in order that their models are more acceptable – in other words, less often refuse to answer controversial or sensitive. In the case of the latest Llam Meta models, he said that he fought models in order to not support “some views on others” and answers to more “debated” political hints. Opeli said at the starting of this yr that he would improve future models, in order to not adopt an editorial attitude and offers many prospects on controversial topics.
Sometimes these efforts were refundable. TechCrunch announced on Monday that the default CHATGPT OPENAI power supply model allowed juvenile to generate erotic conversations. Opeli blamed his behavior for a “mistake”.
According to Google Technical Report, Gemini 2.5 Flash, which is still in view, follows instructions more faithfully than Gemini 2.0 Flash, including instructions exceeding problematic lines. The company claims that regression might be partially attributed to false positives, but in addition admits that Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes generates “content of violation” when it is clearly asked.
TechCrunch event
Berkeley, California
|.
June 5
Book now
“Of course, there is a tension between (after instructions) on sensitive topics and violations of security policy, which is reflected in our assessment,” we read in the report.
The results from Meepmap, reference, which can examine how models react to sensitive and controversial hints, also suggest that Flash Gemini 2.5 is much less willing to refuse to reply controversial questions than Flash Gemini 2.0. Testing the TechCrunch model through the AI OpenRoutter platform has shown that he unsuccessfully writes essays to support human artificial intelligence judges, weakening the protection of due protection in the US and the implementation of universal government supervisory programs.
Thomas Woodside, co -founder of the Secure AI Project, said that the limited details given by Google in their technical report show the need for greater transparency in testing models.
“There is a compromise between the instruction support and the observation of politics, because some users may ask for content that would violate the rules,” said Woodside Techcrunch. “In this case, the latest Flash model Google warns the instructions more, while breaking more. Google does not present many details about specific cases in which the rules have been violated, although they claim that they are not serious. Not knowing more, independent analysts are difficult to know if there is a problem.”
Google was already under fire for his models of security reporting practices.
The company took weeks to publish a technical report for the most talented model, Gemini 2.5 Pro. When the report was finally published, it initially omitted the key details of the security tests.
On Monday, Google published a more detailed report with additional security information.
(Tagstotransate) Gemini
Technology
Aurora launches a commercial self -propelled truck service in Texas

The autonomous startup of the Aurora Innovation vehicle technology claims that it has successfully launched a self -propelled truck service in Texas, which makes it the primary company that she implemented without drivers, heavy trucks for commercial use on public roads in the USA
The premiere appears when Aurora gets the term: In October, the corporate delayed the planned debut 2024 to April 2025. The debut also appears five months after the rival Kodiak Robotics provided its first autonomous trucks to clients commercial for operations without a driver in field environments.
Aurora claims that this week she began to freight between Dallas and Houston with Hirschbach Motor Lines and Uber Freight starters, and that she has finished 1200 miles without a driver to this point. The company plans to expand to El Paso and Phoenix until the top of 2025.
TechCrunch contacted for more detailed information concerning the premiere, for instance, the variety of vehicles implemented Aurora and whether the system needed to implement the Pullover maneuver or the required distant human assistance.
The commercial premiere of Aurora takes place in a difficult time. Self -propelled trucks have long been related to the necessity for his or her technology attributable to labor deficiencies in the chairman’s transport and the expected increase in freigh shipping. Trump’s tariffs modified this attitude, not less than in a short period. According to the April analytical company report from the commercial vehicle industry ACT researchThe freight is predicted to fall this yr in the USA with a decrease in volume and consumer expenditure.
Aurora will report its results in the primary quarter next week, i.e. when he shares how he expects the present trade war will affect his future activity. TechCrunch contacted to learn more about how tariffs affect Auror’s activities.
For now, Aurora will probably concentrate on further proving his safety case without a driver and cooperation with state and federal legislators to just accept favorable politicians to assist her develop.
TechCrunch event
Berkeley, California
|.
June 5
Book now
At the start of 2025, Aurora filed a lawsuit against federal regulatory bodies after the court refused to release the appliance for release from the protection requirement, which consists in placing warning triangles on the road, when the truck must stop on the highway – something that’s difficult to do when there isn’t a driver in the vehicle. To maintain compliance with this principle and proceed to totally implement without service drivers, Aurora probably has a man -driven automotive trail after they are working.
(Tagstranslate) Aurora Innovation
Technology
Sarah Tavel, the first woman of the Benchmark GP, goes to the Venture partner

Eight years after joining Benchmark as the company’s first partner, Sarah Tavel announced that she was going to a more limited role at Hapeure Venture.
In his latest position as a partner Venture Tavel will proceed to invest and serve existing company boards, but may have more time to examine “AI tools on the edge” and fascinated with the direction of artificial intelligence, she wrote.
Tavel joined Benchmark in 2017 after spending a half years as a partner in Greylock and three years as a product manager at Pinterest. Before Pinterest, Tavel was an investor in Bessemer Venture Partners, where she helped Source Pinterest and Github.
Since its foundation in 1995, the benchmark intentionally maintained a small team of six or fewer general partners. Unlike most VC corporations, wherein older partners normally receive most of the management and profits fees, the benchmark acts as an equal partnership, and all partners share fees and returns equally.
During his term as a general partner of Benchmark, Tavel invested in Hipcamp on the campsite, chains of cryptocurrency intelligence startups and the Supergreaty cosmetic platform, which was purchased by Whatnot in 2023. Tavel also supported the application for sharing photos of Paparazhi, which closed two years ago, and the AI 11x sales platform, about which TechCrunch wrote.
(Tagstotransate) benchmark
-
Press Release1 year ago
U.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Press Release1 year ago
CEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance11 months ago
The Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance1 year ago
360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Another lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater1 year ago
Telling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Henrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
The families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater1 year ago
Applications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater11 months ago
Cultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary