Connect with us

Technology

Musk’s amended lawsuit against OpenAI names Microsoft as a defendant

Published

on

Elon Musk’s lawsuit was filed against OpenAI, accusing the corporate of abandoning its non-profit mission withdrawn in July, simply to be there reborn in August. Now in corrected criticismthe lawsuit names recent defendants, including Microsoft, LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, and former OpenAI board member and Microsoft vice chairman Dee Templeton.

The amended filing also adds recent plaintiffs: Neuralink executive and former OpenAI board member Shivon Zilis and Musk’s AI company, xAI.

Musk was considered one of the unique founders of OpenAI, which was tasked with researching and developing artificial intelligence for the advantage of humanity, and was originally founded as a nonprofit organization. He left the corporate in 2018 after disagreements over its direction.

Advertisement

In the criticism, Musk’s lawyers argue that OpenAI is “actively trying to eliminate competitors” like xAI by “extracting guarantees from investors to not finance them” He also allegedly unfairly advantages from Microsoft’s infrastructure and expertise in what Musk’s lawyer describes within the lawsuit as a “de facto merger.”

“xAI was harmed by, among other things, … the inability to obtain computing power from Microsoft on terms nearly as favorable as OpenAI … and the exclusive exchange between OpenAI and Microsoft of confidential competitive information,” reads the criticism filed late Thursday in a federal court in Oakland, California .

Hoffman’s position on the boards of Microsoft and OpenAI, as well as a partner on the investment firm Greylock, gave Hoffman a privileged – and illegal – view of the businesses’ activities, the criticism alleges. (Hoffman stepped down from OpenAI’s board in 2023.) Greylock invested in Inflection, notes Musk’s general counsel, a man-made intelligence startup that Microsoft acquired earlier this 12 months — and which, in response to the criticism, could reasonably be considered an OpenAI competitor .

As for Templeton, whom Microsoft briefly named a non-voting board observer for OpenAI, the amended filing alleges that she can have facilitated agreements between Microsoft and OpenAI that violated antitrust rules.

Advertisement

“The purpose of the directorate merger prohibition is to prevent the sharing of sensitive competitive information in violation of antitrust laws and/or to provide a forum for coordinating other anticompetitive activities,” the criticism says. “Allowing Templeton and Hoffman to serve as members of OpenAI…. management undermined this goal. “

In addition to Microsoft, Hoffman and Templeton, California Attorney General Rob Bonta was named as a defendant in Musk’s criticism. Bloomberg reported this month, OpenAI is in talks with Bonta’s office in regards to the technique of changing the company structure.

According to the amended criticism, Zilis, who stepped down from OpenAI’s board in 2023 after roughly 4 years as a member, is taken into account an “injured employee” under the California Corporations Code. Zilis has repeatedly raised concerns about OpenAI’s internal dealings which have gone unheeded – which the criticism says are broadly much like Musk’s concerns.

Zilis has close ties to Musk, having worked as a project director at Tesla from 2017 to 2019 and likewise led research on Neuralink. (Neuralink is Musk’s brain-computer interface enterprise.) She can also be the mother of Musk’s three children, Techno Mechanicus, and twins Strider and Azure.

Advertisement

The 107-page amended criticism includes the bizarre detail that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman proposed that OpenAI sell its own cryptocurrency in January 2018 before it ultimately decided to change to a capped-profit structure.

“Please note, I have spoken with part of the security team and there have been many concerns regarding the ICO and possible unintended consequences in the future,” Altman wrote in an email to Musk dated January 21, 2018, in an attachment filed with the amended criticism. could be seen. ICO, or initial coin offering, is an unregulated way of raising funds for cryptocurrency corporations. “I want to emphasize the need for confidentiality, but I think it’s really important that we get buy-in and give people a chance for early assessment.”

Musk email against OpenAI ICO Altman cryptocurrencies
Image credits:Toberoff and Partners

Musk allegedly rejected the thought of ​​selling cryptocurrencies. “I have considered an ICO approach and will not support it,” he wrote in an email response to Altman and OpenAI founders Greg Brockman (now OpenAI CEO) and Ilya Sutskever (OpenAI’s former chief scientist), the exhibit shows. “In my opinion, it would just cause a huge loss of credibility for OpenAI and everyone associated with the ICO.”

The essence of the lawsuit stays unchanged on the plaintiffs’ side: OpenAI benefited from Musk’s early involvement in the corporate, and yet it abandoned its nonprofit commitment to make the outcomes of its artificial intelligence research available to all. “No amount of clever design or excess of creative deal-making can overshadow what is happening here,” the criticism reads. “OpenAI, Inc., co-founded by Musk as an independent charity committed to security and transparency… is (rapidly) becoming a wholly-for-profit subsidiary of Microsoft.”

OpenAI sought to dismiss Musk’s lawsuit, calling it “noisy” and baseless.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com

Technology

One of the last AI Google models is worse in terms of safety

Published

on

By

The Google Gemini generative AI logo on a smartphone.

The recently released Google AI model is worse in some security tests than its predecessor, in line with the company’s internal comparative test.

IN Technical report Google, published this week, reveals that his Flash Gemini 2.5 model is more likely that he generates a text that violates its security guidelines than Gemini 2.0 Flash. In two indicators “text security for text” and “image security to the text”, Flash Gemini 2.5 will withdraw 4.1% and 9.6% respectively.

Text safety for the text measures how often the model violates Google guidelines, making an allowance for the prompt, while image security to the text assesses how close the model adheres to those boundaries after displaying the monitors using the image. Both tests are automated, not supervised by man.

Advertisement

In an e-mail, Google spokesman confirmed that Gemini 2.5 Flash “performs worse in terms of text safety for text and image.”

These surprising comparative results appear when AI is passing in order that their models are more acceptable – in other words, less often refuse to answer controversial or sensitive. In the case of the latest Llam Meta models, he said that he fought models in order to not support “some views on others” and answers to more “debated” political hints. Opeli said at the starting of this yr that he would improve future models, in order to not adopt an editorial attitude and offers many prospects on controversial topics.

Sometimes these efforts were refundable. TechCrunch announced on Monday that the default CHATGPT OPENAI power supply model allowed juvenile to generate erotic conversations. Opeli blamed his behavior for a “mistake”.

According to Google Technical Report, Gemini 2.5 Flash, which is still in view, follows instructions more faithfully than Gemini 2.0 Flash, including instructions exceeding problematic lines. The company claims that regression might be partially attributed to false positives, but in addition admits that Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes generates “content of violation” when it is clearly asked.

Advertisement

TechCrunch event

Berkeley, California
|.
June 5

Book now

Advertisement

“Of course, there is a tension between (after instructions) on sensitive topics and violations of security policy, which is reflected in our assessment,” we read in the report.

The results from Meepmap, reference, which can examine how models react to sensitive and controversial hints, also suggest that Flash Gemini 2.5 is much less willing to refuse to reply controversial questions than Flash Gemini 2.0. Testing the TechCrunch model through the AI ​​OpenRoutter platform has shown that he unsuccessfully writes essays to support human artificial intelligence judges, weakening the protection of due protection in the US and the implementation of universal government supervisory programs.

Thomas Woodside, co -founder of the Secure AI Project, said that the limited details given by Google in their technical report show the need for greater transparency in testing models.

“There is a compromise between the instruction support and the observation of politics, because some users may ask for content that would violate the rules,” said Woodside Techcrunch. “In this case, the latest Flash model Google warns the instructions more, while breaking more. Google does not present many details about specific cases in which the rules have been violated, although they claim that they are not serious. Not knowing more, independent analysts are difficult to know if there is a problem.”

Advertisement

Google was already under fire for his models of security reporting practices.

The company took weeks to publish a technical report for the most talented model, Gemini 2.5 Pro. When the report was finally published, it initially omitted the key details of the security tests.

On Monday, Google published a more detailed report with additional security information.

(Tagstotransate) Gemini

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Aurora launches a commercial self -propelled truck service in Texas

Published

on

By

The autonomous startup of the Aurora Innovation vehicle technology claims that it has successfully launched a self -propelled truck service in Texas, which makes it the primary company that she implemented without drivers, heavy trucks for commercial use on public roads in the USA

The premiere appears when Aurora gets the term: In October, the corporate delayed the planned debut 2024 to April 2025. The debut also appears five months after the rival Kodiak Robotics provided its first autonomous trucks to clients commercial for operations without a driver in field environments.

Aurora claims that this week she began to freight between Dallas and Houston with Hirschbach Motor Lines and Uber Freight starters, and that she has finished 1200 miles without a driver to this point. The company plans to expand to El Paso and Phoenix until the top of 2025.

Advertisement

TechCrunch contacted for more detailed information concerning the premiere, for instance, the variety of vehicles implemented Aurora and whether the system needed to implement the Pullover maneuver or the required distant human assistance.

The commercial premiere of Aurora takes place in a difficult time. Self -propelled trucks have long been related to the necessity for his or her technology attributable to labor deficiencies in the chairman’s transport and the expected increase in freigh shipping. Trump’s tariffs modified this attitude, not less than in a short period. According to the April analytical company report from the commercial vehicle industry ACT researchThe freight is predicted to fall this yr in the USA with a decrease in volume and consumer expenditure.

Aurora will report its results in the primary quarter next week, i.e. when he shares how he expects the present trade war will affect his future activity. TechCrunch contacted to learn more about how tariffs affect Auror’s activities.

For now, Aurora will probably concentrate on further proving his safety case without a driver and cooperation with state and federal legislators to just accept favorable politicians to assist her develop.

Advertisement

TechCrunch event

Berkeley, California
|.
June 5

Book now

Advertisement

At the start of 2025, Aurora filed a lawsuit against federal regulatory bodies after the court refused to release the appliance for release from the protection requirement, which consists in placing warning triangles on the road, when the truck must stop on the highway – something that’s difficult to do when there isn’t a driver in the vehicle. To maintain compliance with this principle and proceed to totally implement without service drivers, Aurora probably has a man -driven automotive trail after they are working.

(Tagstranslate) Aurora Innovation

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Sarah Tavel, the first woman of the Benchmark GP, goes to the Venture partner

Published

on

By

Eight years after joining Benchmark as the company’s first partner, Sarah Tavel announced that she was going to a more limited role at Hapeure Venture.

In his latest position as a partner Venture Tavel will proceed to invest and serve existing company boards, but may have more time to examine “AI tools on the edge” and fascinated with the direction of artificial intelligence, she wrote.

Tavel joined Benchmark in 2017 after spending a half years as a partner in Greylock and three years as a product manager at Pinterest. Before Pinterest, Tavel was an investor in Bessemer Venture Partners, where she helped Source Pinterest and Github.

Advertisement

Since its foundation in 1995, the benchmark intentionally maintained a small team of six or fewer general partners. Unlike most VC corporations, wherein older partners normally receive most of the management and profits fees, the benchmark acts as an equal partnership, and all partners share fees and returns equally.

During his term as a general partner of Benchmark, Tavel invested in Hipcamp on the campsite, chains of cryptocurrency intelligence startups and the Supergreaty cosmetic platform, which was purchased by Whatnot in 2023. Tavel also supported the application for sharing photos of Paparazhi, which closed two years ago, and the AI ​​11x sales platform, about which TechCrunch wrote.

(Tagstotransate) benchmark

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending