Politics and Current
Stephen A. Smith fumes at Oprah and Michelle Obama, accusing them of making voters feel like they don’t ‘necessary’

Let the electoral blame game begin.
ESPN host Stephen A. Smith has he solid his vote within the post-election ritual of pointing to someone or something as the explanation a candidate lost, pointing to Oprah Winfrey and Michelle Obama.
On Wednesday on his podcast “The Stephen A. Smith Show,” Smith said the media mogul and former first lady set an exclusionary tone that turned off men (Trump’s most credible voting bloc).

“If we don’t agree with you, are we against you?” Smith said, referencing the media mogul and former first lady’s speeches. “What do you think the men thought about this? So we must do what you tell us; otherwise we are against you? Did you think it worked? Do you know anything about most men? Do you think this will work?”
Oprah and Michelle O. are among the many long list of celebrities who’ve endorsed Democrat Kamala Harris. She had on her side the most well-liked artists within the country (Beyonce and Taylor Swift), essentially the most famous athlete (LeBron James) and two of essentially the most famous actors (George Clooney and Harrison Ford). Stars from the past (Madonna and Bruce Springsteen) and current (Charli xcx and Lizzo) declared their support for Harris.
But together they were all fair sermon for the choirsaid Seth Abramovitch, senior author at the Hollywood Reporter.
“Oprah, Katy Perry, Beyoncé, Lady Gaga, Madonna, Ariana Grande – these are artists whose audiences (black, female, liberal, queer) were already willing to vote for Kamala,” he told The Guardian.
Swift, popular with each country and pop fans, appears to be an outlier, Abramovich said, but her influence was negligible amongst two demographic groups which have shifted significantly toward Trump.
Of course, the identical may be said about famous Trump supporters. Women of color, part of the demographic most proof against the previous and future commander-in-chief, weren’t about to be influenced by the likes of Hulk Hogan, Kid Rock and Lee Greenwood.
Left or right, famously, they rarely, if ever, move the counter together with voters.
“In the academic literature,” said Professor Margaretha Bentley of Arizona State University, who has studied Swift’s cultural impact, “research has shown that while celebrity endorsements can increase civic engagement and voter registration, it has not been proven to have a direct impact on the way people make voting decisions.”
When Swift endorsed Harris, she directed followers to this page voting.gov. The website was visited by 405,999 people in 24 hours. However, not everyone was convinced to vote for the previous prosecutor and current vice chairman.
In fact, Swift can have hurt Harris greater than helped. A poll conducted by YouGov shortly after her endorsement found that only 8 percent of voters can be “somewhat” or “much more” more likely to vote for Harris, well below the 20 percent of respondents who said supporting Swift would make them less more likely to vote for a Democrat.
Ashley Spillane of Harvard, who writer a study titled “Celebrities Strengthen Our Culture of Democracy” found that it’s unattainable to quantify whether a celeb endorsement translates into more votes for a candidate.
This is a change from the past. A 2008 poll conducted by Northwestern University found that Oprah’s endorsement of Barack Obama added roughly a million votes to his final tally.
But that was in less divisive times.
Smith argued that it was Oprah’s message, not Oprah herself, that turned off male voters. Her warning on the eve of the election was that a second Trump term would herald an antidemocratic takeover of the United States
“This is something that alienates the electorate, alienates the voter,” Smith said. “Because the freedom you tell them you have, you’re trying to morally confiscate it by letting them know you’re worth nothing if you don’t vote the way we think you should vote.”
“Who will decide on this in the general election?” Smith asked. “In an economy full of inflation, with over 12 million people crossing the border?”
Stephen A Smith destroys Democrats and Oprah. Listen. pic.twitter.com/PWf14XxpPw
— The Godfather (@facts215_) November 7, 2024
The high-power recommendations also served to substantiate Republicans’ findings that Democrats were an elite party.
“Ultimately, stars price lots of of tens of millions, if not billions, who most American residents imagine are incredibly out of touch with their lifestyle and the standard of it, weren’t going to run away and blame them for doing something different than what their experience says and what they should do with it do,” Smith said.
The people almost certainly to learn from a celeb’s endorsement are the celebrity themselves, says Laurence F. Maslon, an art professor at New York University.
“I think sometimes it’s a way of tying your star to someone who seems to be good for you, and maybe there’s some kind of reflected glory in that,” Maslon said.
British comedian Ricky Gervais probably said it best video – he posted in June wherein he ridiculed overly serious stars who imagine that their political beliefs really matter.
“As a celebrity, I know everything about science and politics, so trust me when I tell you who you should vote for,” Gervais said. “If you don’t vote the right way it will be like a hate crime and it makes me sad and angry so I will leave the country and you don’t want that.”
Politics and Current
Experts warn that Trump Cuts to Federal Grants will make black communities less safe and prosperous

Black communities and leaders who work to ensure their safety and prosperously behave in front of the stream of monetary cuts issued by Trump’s administration in recent days.
Cutting, a part of the goal of President Donald Trump, to significantly reduce the dimensions and scope of the federal government budget over $ 6 trillion, included the elimination of billions of dollars in financing programs of subsidies created to reduce weapons within the case of weapons in black and brown communities, and even developing the subsequent generation of black and brown leaders working on final social damage, reminiscent of Homelessness, hunger and even close education.
Over the past week, the Department of Justice of the Trump Administration canceled Hundreds of hundreds of thousands of dollars of subsidies have concluded contracts with organizations working in communities so as to put the tip of violence in the neighborhood, including violence using weapons and domestic violence. The Education Department canceled $ 1 billion at college similarly Mental health subsidieswhich were used to implement intervention experts in schools, hospitals and other hotspots to prevent rapid ends in communities.
“These programs are particularly effective in black communities,” said Anesa McMillan, spokeswoman Giffords, and organizing violence within the matter of weapons, founded by the previous congression of Gabby Giffords, who survived the attempt to kill in 2011.
“These are people who came from the community (I) who knew people involved in many conflicts. This was critical, especially because violence does not receive, say, shooting at school,” she said.
By announcing restrictions on subsidies for interventions in the sector of community, the Prosecutor General Pam Bondi said he was a part of the goal, because it was, because it was a discount in waste. However, supporters indicate this The data show that bilateral investments (financed by the President’s Act Joe Biden 2022 Safer Communities) actually operate. In 2023 and 2024, the murder of weapons and violence from weapons rates cut.

“These decisions should not apply to politics. It is about people who are actually influenced by violence from daily weapons and almost every hour … The cost of doing nothing to prevent violence using weapons, significantly exceeds the costs of these programs,” said Goodwin, who also founded the Community Justice Action Fund, a national organization of prevention of violence within the case of violence.
In addition to subsidies focused on violence and mental health, the one government agency focused on social service and volunteering, Americorps, saw 90% of the working force of the working force reduced by the Department of Trump’s government, led by the billionaire Elon Musk. This has already resulted in federal lawsuit Complex by the coalition of several dozen states and Washington
Financing included subsidies granted to long -term non -profit organizers, reminiscent of public allies who train and develop social youth leaders through practices to ultimately work on socio -economic challenges -from help related to disasters after community related to environmental justice, especially black and brown.
“When we have a dona of financing to support our schools and communities that have a level of disinvaluation in public education systems, especially in districts and communities that have the least available resources when we see the erosion of investment in things, such as flats and the development of new apartments at affordable prices, all these things disproportionately affect us,” said Jenise Terrell, CEO.

“These are young people who in many cases earn less than USD 15 per hour, sometimes much less, who literally experience and bloom to payments, simply, so that they can devote their time and service,” said Terrell, who’s an align of a ten -year program.
Despite the loss of labor in the neighborhood, young leaders are most concerned about members of the community who will not use work and commitment.
“They still come to the table worried about communities … They want to know who will look for young people in the program after school (for example),” said Terrell.
The Trump administration also associated lots of his cuts related to diversity, equality and inclusion, i.e. Dei, which President Trump created the predominant feature of his budget and politics frame. Instead of specializing in diversity or justice, Trump’s administration called for an approach based on “merits”, especially by way of employment and contractual orders.

“Our approach to merit is slightly different than the approach to the current administration,” said Terrell. “We believe that it is, in addition to what you have achieved, also includes experiences that you bring to the table. Experiences that provide insight, which is often lacking in solutions.”
Despite the attitude of the White House, supporters still hope that the administration may be convinced to the course of reversing the subsidies cuts. Some actively engage the members of the Congress, from each political parties on this matter.
Congress also introduces intensive negotiations within the Capitol Hill case, because they’re working on finalizing the budget for the budget 12 months 2026. Trump’s budget proposal requires $ 163 billion cuts from its discretionary budget value $ 1.7 trillion as well as to billions of dollars, which Doge has already lowered or frozen within the name of waste and fraud.
The representative of the American Yvette Clarke, chairman of the Congress of the Black Club, called the brand new Trump budget “reckless” and argued that he would like to make mandatory cuts for necessary federal agencies than to work on “improving the economy, reducing the cost of living and making everyday needs at an affordable price.”
“This budget program imposes economic difficulties on everyday Americans, it makes our country is less safe, and our communities are more sensitive,” said Clarke. “We, CBC members, will not be a party to the destruction of our communities and people they chose to represent.”
(Tagstranslate) Donald Trump
Politics and Current
Kamala Harris is hit by Trump’s “narrow, selfish vision of America”: Here are the best letters of her speech – essence

(Photo Camille Cohen/AFP by Getty Images)
The former vp of Kamala Harris on Wednesday evening gave a pointy criticism of President Donald Trump. Her comments, delivered during a speech in the most significant speech at the twentieth anniversary gala Emerge America, She meant her the most extensive public comments since leaving the office.
He didn’t perform any blows from the stage in San Francisco.
“They are counting on the view that if they manage to fear some people, it will have a frozen influence on others,” she said. “But they overlooked that fear is not the only contagious thing. Courage is contagious.”
During the 15-minute speech, Harris described Trump’s leadership not only as “chaotic”, but as part of an extended, intentional effort to rework the country in a way that threatens basic freedoms.
“What we are witnessing is a high speed event,” she said. “Where the ship is used to quickly implement the program, which was decades in this creation. Program for cutting public education. The program of reducing the government, and then privatization of its services. Everything, while providing tax breaks among the richest among us.”
She added: “By the way, a program that does not reduce costs. It does not make life more affordable. And not what they promised.”
Harris sharply criticized Trump’s economic policy, especially calling his tariffs. “Reckless,” she said. “They hurt employees and families, as well as American companies. As I predicted, [they] They clearly invite recession. “
At the time when concerns about the rule of law and democratic institutions are growing, Harris warned: “This is a crisis that will eventually affect everyone. Because this would mean that the rules protecting our basic rights and freedoms … will no longer matter.”
She continued: “This is a program, a narrow, selfish vision of America, during which the waitresses of truth punish, favor loyalists, earn on their power and leave everyone to manage.

Harris praised several democratic legislators for defending the current administration, checking the name Cory Booker, Chris Van Hollen, Chris Murphy, Bern Sanders, Jasmine Crockett, Maxwell Frost and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for his or her “moral transparency”.
While Harris didn’t turn to her own political future – despite the growing speculation about the potential governorate offer in California – she ended realism and determination.
“Probably the situation will get worse before it improves,” she said. “But we’re ready for it.”
Politics and Current
Trump wants to pay Rwanda to take deported from us

The Rwandan government and the Trump administration are talking a few possible agreement that may allow kigali to receive deported from the United States-in this Africans and other residents, he was not rwanda-he was touched.
According to an official in Rwanda, it is predicted that discussions on potential financial compensation and other logistics details will take place in the following two weeks. Both US and Rwandan officials confirmed that negotiations They are within the technique of moving residents of third country deported from the USA to Rwanda.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio was very loud in regards to the willingness of Trump’s administration to send people to other countries, even countries from which individuals don’t necessarily come.
“We work with other countries to say:” We want to send you probably the most vile people, “he said during a television meeting of the office when he was sitting next to Donald Trump. Rubio also said that the “further from America, the higher”.
The same agreement with the Salvador, under which some deportatts are imprisoned within the notorious Cecot prison on this country, led to quite a lot of processes against Trump’s administration.
However, other countries, equivalent to Panama and Mexico, whose President Claudia Sheinbaum publicly threw herself as an opponent of Trump, agreed to accept the deported ones who don’t come from these countries.
According to the article from 2024, Rwanda, like Salvador, accused of violating human rights of his residents The arrest and torture of the families of the banished residents who’re critics of the country. In addition, according to the UN investigators, the Rwanda government is accused of supporting a bunch of rebels, in addition to for suppression and murder, arrest or disappearance of their political opponents.
According to their latest reports, Rwanda lobbyes as a destination of the deportation People who haven’t been Rwandans for years who’ve been critical of the Rwanda government, described as an attempt to wash their popularity as a spot where human rights abuse are crazy.
According to the United States official, who worked on relations in Rwanda within the Biden administration: “The more cozy that Rwanda will reach Trump’s administration, the less likely that they are pressed to make a license,” probably giving them a lever in peaceful conversations, Trump’s administration tries between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwana.
Jeffery Smith, executive director of the Non-profit pro-democracy organization, Vanguard Africa, described any plan to deport immigrants to Rwanda as “morally and legally reprehensible, to continue,” this is just a trick to get positive headers and a cynical way during which to force Western rule, equivalent to the US They are right.
(Tagstranslat) deportations
-
Press Release1 year ago
U.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Press Release1 year ago
CEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance11 months ago
The Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance1 year ago
360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Another lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater1 year ago
Telling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Henrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
The families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater1 year ago
Applications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater11 months ago
Cultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary