Technology
For security reasons, we have to stop answering calls

How do you understand the person on the opposite end of the phone call is admittedly who they are saying they’re?
Earlier in July, the Ferrari executive was inundated with a barrage of WhatsApp messages that appeared to be from his boss, the carmaker’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna. However, the Ferrari executive didn’t recognize the number and couldn’t ensure whether it was really his boss.
Suspicious of the avalanche of messages from an unknown number, the Ferrari executive still took a call from someone claiming to be Vigna. Despite the proven fact that the alleged CEO had Vigna’s southern Italian accent, the manager still felt something was flawed, so he asked the caller something only Vigna would know, something the 2 had discussed in person days earlier.
“I’m sorry, Benedetto, but I need to identify you,” the director said. Then the decision abruptly ended, and managed to avoid a potentially colossal fraudas Bloomberg reported earlier this yr.
If you think that the Ferrari CEO is a rare edge case for scammers, reconsider. For so long as there have been telephones, there have been people trying to trick someone into considering they’re another person. Now, as with the Ferrari attack, voice AI tools are enabling scammers to clone someone’s voice and trick victims into considering they’re talking to another person.
All of those attacks involve the phone, or reasonably, receiving a phone call. Once the decision is answered, scammers and swindlers can use tactics designed to pressure you into acting quickly and rashly in a high-stress situation.
You’ve probably heard of a few of these scams before.
Listen, police (or feds) they will not call you to make a grievance that “a warrant has been issued for your arrest” or demand payment to have the warrant canceled. If a warrant has been issued on your arrest, the police won’t leave you a threatening voicemail; they’ll come to your house.
It’s unlikely that your health care provider will call you to demand payment over the phone without first sending you a letter or paper bill. The FBI says health care fraud it will probably affect anyone and it ranges from scammers posing as healthcare staff to false claims that you simply owe an impressive amount on a non-existent account.
And yes, you ought to be wary if someone on the opposite end of a phone call claims to be out of your bank, employer or online technology company, calling you to “verify your personal information” or asking you for a security code sent to your phone.
The alternative is to stop answering the phone. Wait, discover, after which respond.
Some scams are more sophisticated than others, including spoofing phone numbers that appear to be real on caller ID and using AI tools to manipulate an individual’s voice; this is typically referred to as a “deepfake.” Often, the scammer will try to elicit a response or response by posing as an in depth member of the family in need. Even for those who think you understand the person calling you but can’t be completely sure, there could also be a superb reason for it. Trust your instincts, be vigilant.
Take the Ferrari near-crash. During the conversation, the Ferrari executive asked the alleged CEO a matter that only the actual boss would know, the title of a book they’d discussed a number of days earlier. On a smaller scale, some friends and families have agreed on protected words or phrases they’ll use in case they need to prove it was really them. (Taking it a step further, using an alternate phrase only when the victim is speaking under duress will help alert others to the damaging situation.)
If someone calls you out of the blue to ask on your information, how do you understand the person calling you is definitely legitimate? You can only depend on the caller’s phone number, and you could not recognize the numbers.
If your bank says it is looking you, call the number in your bank card to check.
If an organization or organization you recognize calls you and asks for information that makes you suspicious, hang up, go to the organization’s website or official app, and call them back directly. Don’t just depend on looking for a phone number on Google, as scammers can trick search engines like google and yahoo to display fake customer support phone numbers utilized by scammers.
If you receive a call saying that somebody has logged into one in all your online accounts, go to your online account website or app and check it yourself before taking further motion. Most corporations, akin to Google or Facebook, don’t call you, but depend on their official customer support portals.
Be like that Ferrari executive. Take a moment to breathe and think, and take control of the situation. And the following time your phone notifies you of an incoming call, perhaps just let it go to voicemail.
Technology
Anysphere, which makes the cursor supposedly collect USD 900 million with a valuation of USD 9 billion

Anysphere, producer of coding cursor with AI drive, attracted $ 900 million in the recent financing round by Thrive Capital, Financial Times He informed, citing anonymous sources familiar with the contract.
The report said that Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z) and ACCEL also participate in the round, which values about $ 9 billion.
The cursor collected $ 105 million from Thrive, and A16Z with a valuation of $ 2.5 billion, as TechCrunch said in December. Capital Thrive also led this round and in addition participated in A16Z. According to Crunchbase data, the startup has collected over $ 173 million thus far.
It is alleged that investors, including index ventures and a reference point, attempt to support the company, but plainly existing investors don’t want to miss the opportunity to support it.
Other coding start-ups powered by artificial intelligence also attract the interest of investors. Techcrunch announced in February that Windsurf, a rival for Aklesphere, talked about collecting funds at a valuation of $ 3 billion. Openai, an investor in Anysphere, was supposedly I’m attempting to get windsurf for about the same value.
(Tagstransate) A16Z
(*9*)This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Technology
This is the shipping of products from China to the USA

The Chinese retailer has modified the strategy in the face of American tariffs.
Thanks to the executive ordinance, President Donald Trump ended the so -called de minimis principle, which allowed goods value 800 USD or less entering the country without tariffs. It also increases tariffs to Chinese goods by over 100%, forcing each Chinese firms and Shein, in addition to American giants, similar to Amazon to adapt plans and price increases.
CNBC reports that this was also affected, and American buyers see “import fees” from 130% to 150% added to their accounts. Now, nevertheless, the company is not sending the goods directly from China to the United States. Instead, it only displays the offers of products available in American warehouses, while goods sent from China are listed as outside the warehouse.
“He actively recruits American sellers to join the platform,” said the spokesman ago. “The transfer is to help local sellers reach more customers and develop their companies.”
(tagstotransate) tariffs
Technology
One of the last AI Google models is worse in terms of safety

The recently released Google AI model is worse in some security tests than its predecessor, in line with the company’s internal comparative test.
IN Technical report Google, published this week, reveals that his Flash Gemini 2.5 model is more likely that he generates a text that violates its security guidelines than Gemini 2.0 Flash. In two indicators “text security for text” and “image security to the text”, Flash Gemini 2.5 will withdraw 4.1% and 9.6% respectively.
Text safety for the text measures how often the model violates Google guidelines, making an allowance for the prompt, while image security to the text assesses how close the model adheres to those boundaries after displaying the monitors using the image. Both tests are automated, not supervised by man.
In an e-mail, Google spokesman confirmed that Gemini 2.5 Flash “performs worse in terms of text safety for text and image.”
These surprising comparative results appear when AI is passing in order that their models are more acceptable – in other words, less often refuse to answer controversial or sensitive. In the case of the latest Llam Meta models, he said that he fought models in order to not support “some views on others” and answers to more “debated” political hints. Opeli said at the starting of this yr that he would improve future models, in order to not adopt an editorial attitude and offers many prospects on controversial topics.
Sometimes these efforts were refundable. TechCrunch announced on Monday that the default CHATGPT OPENAI power supply model allowed juvenile to generate erotic conversations. Opeli blamed his behavior for a “mistake”.
According to Google Technical Report, Gemini 2.5 Flash, which is still in view, follows instructions more faithfully than Gemini 2.0 Flash, including instructions exceeding problematic lines. The company claims that regression might be partially attributed to false positives, but in addition admits that Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes generates “content of violation” when it is clearly asked.
TechCrunch event
Berkeley, California
|.
June 5
Book now
“Of course, there is a tension between (after instructions) on sensitive topics and violations of security policy, which is reflected in our assessment,” we read in the report.
The results from Meepmap, reference, which can examine how models react to sensitive and controversial hints, also suggest that Flash Gemini 2.5 is much less willing to refuse to reply controversial questions than Flash Gemini 2.0. Testing the TechCrunch model through the AI OpenRoutter platform has shown that he unsuccessfully writes essays to support human artificial intelligence judges, weakening the protection of due protection in the US and the implementation of universal government supervisory programs.
Thomas Woodside, co -founder of the Secure AI Project, said that the limited details given by Google in their technical report show the need for greater transparency in testing models.
“There is a compromise between the instruction support and the observation of politics, because some users may ask for content that would violate the rules,” said Woodside Techcrunch. “In this case, the latest Flash model Google warns the instructions more, while breaking more. Google does not present many details about specific cases in which the rules have been violated, although they claim that they are not serious. Not knowing more, independent analysts are difficult to know if there is a problem.”
Google was already under fire for his models of security reporting practices.
The company took weeks to publish a technical report for the most talented model, Gemini 2.5 Pro. When the report was finally published, it initially omitted the key details of the security tests.
On Monday, Google published a more detailed report with additional security information.
(Tagstotransate) Gemini
-
Press Release1 year ago
U.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Press Release1 year ago
CEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance11 months ago
The Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance1 year ago
360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Another lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater1 year ago
Telling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Henrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
The families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater1 year ago
Applications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater11 months ago
Cultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary