Technology
Elon Musk’s X Could Still Be Sanctioned for Training Grok on Europeans’ Data

Earlier this week, the EU’s top privacy regulator wrapped up legal proceedings over how X processed user data to coach its Grok AI chatbot, however the saga isn’t over yet for the Elon Musk-owned social media platform formerly referred to as Twitter. Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) confirmed to TechCrunch that it has received — and can “investigate” — plenty of complaints filed under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
“The DPC will now investigate the extent to which any processing that took place complies with the relevant provisions of the GDPR,” the regulator told TechCrunch. “If, as a result of that investigation, it is determined that TUIC (Twitter International Unlimited Company, as X’s principal Irish subsidiary is still called) has breached the GDPR, the DPC will consider whether the exercise of any of the remedial powers is justified, and if so, which one(s).”
X agreed to suspend processing data for Grok training in early August. X’s commitment was then made everlasting earlier this week. That agreement required X to delete and stop using European user data for training its AIs that it collected between May 7, 2024, and August 1, 2024, based on a replica obtained by TechCrunch. However, it’s now clear that X has no obligation to delete any AI models trained on that data.
So far, X has not faced any sanctions from the DPC for processing Europeans’ personal data to coach Grok without people’s consent – despite urgent legal motion by the DPC to dam the info collection. Fines under the GDPR will be severe, reaching as much as 4% of world annual turnover. (Considering that the corporate’s revenues are currently free falland will struggle to succeed in $500 million this yr, judging by its published quarterly results, which could possibly be particularly painful.)
Regulators even have the facility to order operational changes by demanding that violations stop. However, investigating complaints and enforcing them can take a protracted time—even years.
This is significant because while X has been forced to stop using Europeans’ data to coach Grok, it could actually still run any AI models it has already trained on data from individuals who haven’t consented to its use — with none urgent intervention or sanctions to forestall this.
When asked whether the commitment the DPC obtained from X last month required X to delete any AI models trained on Europeans’ data, the DPC confirmed to us that it didn’t: “The commitment does not require TUIC to take that action; it required TUIC to permanently cease processing the datasets covered by the commitment,” the spokesperson said.
Some might say it is a clever way for X (or other model trainers) to get around EU privacy rules: Step 1) Silently use people’s data; Step 2) use it to coach AI models; and — when the cat’s out of the bag and regulators eventually come knocking — commit to deleting the *data* while leaving the trained AI models intact. Step 3) Profit based on Grok!?
When asked about this risk, the DPC replied that the aim of the urgent legal proceedings was to handle “significant concerns” that X’s processing of EU and EEA user data to coach Grok “gave rise to risks to the fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects”. However, it didn’t explain why it didn’t have the identical urgent concerns concerning the risks to the basic rights and freedoms of Europeans resulting from their information being placed on Grok.
Generative AI tools are notorious for producing false information. Musk’s inversion of that category can be deliberately rude—or “anti-woke,” as he calls it. That could raise the stakes within the sorts of content it could produce about users whose data was ingested to coach the bot.
One reason the Irish regulator could also be more cautious about tips on how to take care of the difficulty is that these AI tools are still relatively latest. There can be uncertainty amongst European privacy watchdogs about tips on how to implement GDPR on such a brand new technology. It can be unclear whether the regulation’s powers would come with the power to order the deletion of an AI model if the technology was trained on data processed unlawfully.
However, as complaints on this area proceed to multiply, data protection authorities will ultimately need to face the issue of artificial intelligence.
Cucumber spoilage
In separate news overnight Friday, the news emerged that the pinnacle of Global X has left. Reuters Agency announced the departure of long-time worker Nick Pickles, a British national who spent a decade at Twitter and rose through the ranks during Musk’s tenure.
IN write to XPickles says he made the choice to go away “a few months ago” but didn’t provide details on his reasons for leaving.
But it’s clear the corporate has quite a bit on its plate — including coping with a ban in Brazil and the political backlash within the U.K. over its role in spreading disinformation related to last month’s unrest there, with Musk having a private penchant for adding fuel to the fireplace (including posting on X suggesting that “civil war is inevitable” for the U.K.).
In the EU, X can be under investigation under the bloc’s content moderation framework, with the primary batch of complaints concerning the Digital Services Act filed in July. Musk was also recently singled out for a private warning in an open letter written by the bloc’s Internal Markets Commissioner, Thierry Breton — to which the chaos-loving billionaire decided to reply with an offensive meme.
Technology
Anysphere, which makes the cursor supposedly collect USD 900 million with a valuation of USD 9 billion

Anysphere, producer of coding cursor with AI drive, attracted $ 900 million in the recent financing round by Thrive Capital, Financial Times He informed, citing anonymous sources familiar with the contract.
The report said that Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z) and ACCEL also participate in the round, which values about $ 9 billion.
The cursor collected $ 105 million from Thrive, and A16Z with a valuation of $ 2.5 billion, as TechCrunch said in December. Capital Thrive also led this round and in addition participated in A16Z. According to Crunchbase data, the startup has collected over $ 173 million thus far.
It is alleged that investors, including index ventures and a reference point, attempt to support the company, but plainly existing investors don’t want to miss the opportunity to support it.
Other coding start-ups powered by artificial intelligence also attract the interest of investors. Techcrunch announced in February that Windsurf, a rival for Aklesphere, talked about collecting funds at a valuation of $ 3 billion. Openai, an investor in Anysphere, was supposedly I’m attempting to get windsurf for about the same value.
(Tagstransate) A16Z
(*9*)This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Technology
This is the shipping of products from China to the USA

The Chinese retailer has modified the strategy in the face of American tariffs.
Thanks to the executive ordinance, President Donald Trump ended the so -called de minimis principle, which allowed goods value 800 USD or less entering the country without tariffs. It also increases tariffs to Chinese goods by over 100%, forcing each Chinese firms and Shein, in addition to American giants, similar to Amazon to adapt plans and price increases.
CNBC reports that this was also affected, and American buyers see “import fees” from 130% to 150% added to their accounts. Now, nevertheless, the company is not sending the goods directly from China to the United States. Instead, it only displays the offers of products available in American warehouses, while goods sent from China are listed as outside the warehouse.
“He actively recruits American sellers to join the platform,” said the spokesman ago. “The transfer is to help local sellers reach more customers and develop their companies.”
(tagstotransate) tariffs
Technology
One of the last AI Google models is worse in terms of safety

The recently released Google AI model is worse in some security tests than its predecessor, in line with the company’s internal comparative test.
IN Technical report Google, published this week, reveals that his Flash Gemini 2.5 model is more likely that he generates a text that violates its security guidelines than Gemini 2.0 Flash. In two indicators “text security for text” and “image security to the text”, Flash Gemini 2.5 will withdraw 4.1% and 9.6% respectively.
Text safety for the text measures how often the model violates Google guidelines, making an allowance for the prompt, while image security to the text assesses how close the model adheres to those boundaries after displaying the monitors using the image. Both tests are automated, not supervised by man.
In an e-mail, Google spokesman confirmed that Gemini 2.5 Flash “performs worse in terms of text safety for text and image.”
These surprising comparative results appear when AI is passing in order that their models are more acceptable – in other words, less often refuse to answer controversial or sensitive. In the case of the latest Llam Meta models, he said that he fought models in order to not support “some views on others” and answers to more “debated” political hints. Opeli said at the starting of this yr that he would improve future models, in order to not adopt an editorial attitude and offers many prospects on controversial topics.
Sometimes these efforts were refundable. TechCrunch announced on Monday that the default CHATGPT OPENAI power supply model allowed juvenile to generate erotic conversations. Opeli blamed his behavior for a “mistake”.
According to Google Technical Report, Gemini 2.5 Flash, which is still in view, follows instructions more faithfully than Gemini 2.0 Flash, including instructions exceeding problematic lines. The company claims that regression might be partially attributed to false positives, but in addition admits that Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes generates “content of violation” when it is clearly asked.
TechCrunch event
Berkeley, California
|.
June 5
Book now
“Of course, there is a tension between (after instructions) on sensitive topics and violations of security policy, which is reflected in our assessment,” we read in the report.
The results from Meepmap, reference, which can examine how models react to sensitive and controversial hints, also suggest that Flash Gemini 2.5 is much less willing to refuse to reply controversial questions than Flash Gemini 2.0. Testing the TechCrunch model through the AI OpenRoutter platform has shown that he unsuccessfully writes essays to support human artificial intelligence judges, weakening the protection of due protection in the US and the implementation of universal government supervisory programs.
Thomas Woodside, co -founder of the Secure AI Project, said that the limited details given by Google in their technical report show the need for greater transparency in testing models.
“There is a compromise between the instruction support and the observation of politics, because some users may ask for content that would violate the rules,” said Woodside Techcrunch. “In this case, the latest Flash model Google warns the instructions more, while breaking more. Google does not present many details about specific cases in which the rules have been violated, although they claim that they are not serious. Not knowing more, independent analysts are difficult to know if there is a problem.”
Google was already under fire for his models of security reporting practices.
The company took weeks to publish a technical report for the most talented model, Gemini 2.5 Pro. When the report was finally published, it initially omitted the key details of the security tests.
On Monday, Google published a more detailed report with additional security information.
(Tagstotransate) Gemini
-
Press Release1 year ago
U.S.-Africa Chamber of Commerce Appoints Robert Alexander of 360WiseMedia as Board Director
-
Press Release1 year ago
CEO of 360WiSE Launches Mentorship Program in Overtown Miami FL
-
Business and Finance11 months ago
The Importance of Owning Your Distribution Media Platform
-
Business and Finance1 year ago
360Wise Media and McDonald’s NY Tri-State Owner Operators Celebrate Success of “Faces of Black History” Campaign with Over 2 Million Event Visits
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Another lawsuit accuses Google of bias against Black minority employees
-
Theater1 year ago
Telling the story of the Apollo Theater
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
Henrietta Lacks’ family members reach an agreement after her cells undergo advanced medical tests
-
Ben Crump1 year ago
The families of George Floyd and Daunte Wright hold an emotional press conference in Minneapolis
-
Theater1 year ago
Applications open for the 2020-2021 Soul Producing National Black Theater residency – Black Theater Matters
-
Theater11 months ago
Cultural icon Apollo Theater sets new goals on the occasion of its 85th anniversary