Connect with us

Politics and Current

Federal authorities file new indictment against Trump from Jan. 6, upholding charges but narrowing scope

Published

on

WASHINGTON (AP) — Special prosecutor Jack Smith filed a new indictment Tuesday against Donald Trump in his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election that maintains the identical criminal charges but narrows the charges against him based on a Supreme Court opinion that granted broad immunity to former presidents.

The new indictment removes a bit that accused Trump of attempting to use the Justice Department’s law enforcement powers to overturn his election defeat, an area of ​​the case where the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 opinion last month, ruled Trump was immune from prosecution.

The scaled-down criminal case represents prosecutors’ first try to comply with a Supreme Court ruling that nearly actually says the Republican presidential candidate won’t face trial before the November election on a charge of attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.

That got here days before prosecutors and defense attorneys were set to inform the judge overseeing the case how they need to proceed in light of a Supreme Court ruling that found presidents are presumptively immune from prosecution for official White House actions. The high court sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who must now analyze which counts within the indictment were unofficial actions — or those taken in Trump’s private capability — that would go to trial.

Prosecutors and Trump’s legal team will return to court next week for his or her first hearing in months before Chutkan, on condition that the case has been effectively frozen since last December as Trump’s immunity appeal worked its way through the justice system.

In an announcement posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump called the new indictment an “act of desperation” and an “attempt to resurrect a ‘dead’ witch hunt.” He added that the new case has “all the problems of the old indictment and should be dismissed immediately.”

The special counsel’s office said the updated indictment, filed in federal court in Washington, was issued by a grand jury that had not previously heard evidence within the case. The statement said the indictment “reflects the government’s efforts to respect and implement Supreme Court rulings and referral instructions.”

The new indictment removes references to charges that might be considered official acts for which Trump is entitled to immunity under the Supreme Court ruling. That includes allegations that Trump tried to pull the Justice Department into his failed bid to reverse his election loss, including by conducting sham investigations and falsely reporting to states that he had discovered significant fraud.

In its opinion, the Supreme Court found that the president’s interactions with the Justice Department constitute official acts for which he’s entitled to immunity.

Featured Stories

The original indictment detailed how Jeffrey Clark, a senior official in Trump’s Justice Department, sought to send a letter to elected officials in certain states falsely claiming the department had “identified serious concerns that could have affected the outcome of the election,” but senior department officials refused.

Clark’s support for Trump’s election fraud allegations prompted Trump to openly consider appointing him as acting attorney general to switch Jeffrey Rosen, who led the department in the ultimate weeks of the Trump administration. Trump ultimately backed down from that concept “when told it would lead to mass resignations at the Department of Justice,” in response to the unique indictment. Rosen remained acting attorney general for the rest of Trump’s term.

The new case now not refers to Clark as a co-conspirator. Trump’s alleged co-conspirators should not named in either indictment, but the small print clearly indicate their identities. The new indictment emphasizes that not one of the other co-conspirators “were government officials at the time of the conspiracies and all acted in their private capacities.”

The new indictment also removes references to Trump’s communications with federal government officials — reminiscent of senior White House lawyers — who told him there was no evidence of fraud that will change the consequence of the 2020 election. It also removes references to a few of Trump’s statements, including a claim he made during a White House news conference two days after the election about suspected vote-dumping in Detroit.

The new indictment includes certainly one of the more shocking allegations made by Smith — that Trump participated in a conspiracy orchestrated by allies to recruit fake electors in key battleground states won by Democrat Joe Biden who would falsely certify that Trump had won those states.

The document also reiterates allegations that Trump tried to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to reject valid electoral votes and that Trump and his allies exploited the chaos on the Capitol on Jan. 6 to further delay the certification of Biden’s victory.

Chief Justice Roberts wrote in his majority opinion that the interactions between Trump and Pence constituted official conduct for which “Trump is at least presumptively immune.”

The query, Roberts wrote, is whether or not the federal government can rebut the “presumption of immunity.”

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the ruling. In an excerpt from an interview with CBS News’ “Sunday Morning” that aired Tuesday, she said: “I was concerned about a system that seemed to give immunity to one person in one set of circumstances. When we have a criminal justice system that has traditionally treated everyone the same.”

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

We need to have an uncomfortable conversation about America

Published

on

By

2024 elections, theGrio.com

We need to talk about cockroaches.

According to renowned entomologist Karlous Miller and John Whitfield Jr. (known for his groundbreaking research on a young fly): everyone has them. Although the mosquitoes could have killed more people throughout history than all of the wars, open borders, and Black Lives Matter protests combined, people they’re biological programmed to hate cockroaches greater than every other insect. Housefly it’s much dirtierbut cockroaches symbolize uncleanliness and misery. For many, a single dead cockroach on the lounge floor is more embarrassing than a fly within the kitchen, a mosquito in your skin, or a dead body within the basement.

Not I.

It’s not that I’m just not ashamed of them. I understand that there may be nothing I can do to erase the bulk those that survived prospered from the surface of the planet. The only thing I can do is solve the issue and forestall it from getting worse. Nobody really eliminates cockroaches, you only have to fight them every single day. But apparently there’s just one thing more embarrassing than being a cockroach hunter:

Being a part of a monoracial coalition.

According to experts, political analysts and folks who just say things, the 2024 election was a results of many aspects. For some, Trump’s genius was a matter of religion – proof of what can’t be seen. Wind bags stuffed with political opposites Joe Scarborough AND James Carville blamed Kamala Harris’ loss on the “woke era.” Others blamed the Democrats’ defeat on the party’s inability to attract white women, Latinos switching sides and the party’s lack of messaging. These may sound like different political theories, but they’re all based on the identical unspoken hypothesis. It is an unkillable pest that crawls out of its hiding place every election season. Even essentially the most progressive, outspoken experts are reluctant to address this. This shouldn’t be a theory. It is a fact hiding within the deepest, darkest recesses of each post-election postmortem. But in some way it’s

White can’t be defeated…

The unspoken concept of an invincible coalition of white voters is the breeding ground from which all political opinions are hatched. Experts not only base their analyzes on the existence of this hidden nest of Caucasian voters, but assume its inevitability… Progressive candidates will lose. A black woman cannot turn into president… it doesn’t deal with race… it doesn’t admit that trans people exist. It’s as if white persons are biologically programmed to vote against everyone else. And apparently the one way to defeat the good white cockroach of electoral politics is to pool our voting power through Black, indigenous, people of color washing their feet, eating spicy food, and playing tambourines in church, just like the BIPOCLGBTQIAvengers trying to stop white supremacist Thanos from straight finger snaps.

The tacit acceptance of white invincibility is the rationale and reason for the existence of the phrase “multi-racial coalition.” race is a greater predictor of electoral politics than sex, education and even religion. That’s why the information showing that Spanish male voters support Trump is even noteworthy. White invincibility explains why 53% white women I voted for a white woman opponent in 2016 and why 19% black men vote for white supremacist in 2020.

But what in the event that they’re fallacious?

What should you discover about it? most white women he didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 and never got anywhere near that result 20% of the vote by Black men? What if Latinos hadn’t moved toward Trump? What if black voters didn’t stay home? What if that is all exit polls as fallacious as ever?What if there have been no “unless”? What if sometimes in some elections you only cannot beat white people?

Does this make you are feeling uncomfortable?

When 8 out of 10 white Georgians crawled out of their hiding places to vote, Trump’s victory was inevitable. The rappers who showed up to twerk at Harris rallies didn’t matter. The pantomime guy on the Trump microphone was irrelevant. The discussion about black male voters has turn into moot. More again. Harris has greater than Biden. But even when every non-white voter in Georgia voted for Kamala Harris, she would still lose the state.

Harris winning Georgia was mathematically inconceivable.

There are no “Black jobs” in the Trump administration, despite the cadre of Black Republicans who canvassed for him

Another example comes from the much-discussed Berks County, Pennsylvania. Everyone was shocked once they came upon about it Trump won essentially the most Latino county within the state of Pennsylvania. However, when comparing the outcomes from 2024 counting votes in individual districts down 2020 election results and the US Census shows that Harris’ campaign won more votes than Biden in each of them majority-Hispanic census tract tract within the district. Harris lost because Trump simply accrued votes and increased turnout within the whitest areas and throughout the county 74% white.

Because few states release this sort of data, we cannot have a more complete picture of what happened across the country until we see more accurate data from studies like Verified Pew Voters or A study of cooperative elections. But explaining the 2024 election is awkward. The point is that 2020 was an anomaly. It is kind of possible that the person who won second essentially the most votes within the history of American presidential politics can only be surpassed by a nationwide pandemic that gave voters unfettered access to the ballot. It may simply be that they desire a lying, corrupt white supremacist as their leader, and there may be nothing the democracy can do to stop it.

As uncomfortable as it might be to admit, possibly that is what America wants and democracy has actually won. Maybe white supremacy is like cockroaches. It’s actually inconceivable to do away with it…

You have to fight it every single day.


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Trump chooses first black cabinet member, not Byron Donalds

Published

on

By

Byron Donalds, Trump, Scott Turner


President-elect Donald Trump has chosen the first African-American cabinet member. Scott Turner, shall be SSecretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Trump announced Turner’s placement in a press release. Highlights Turner’s past achievements. The future HUD secretary is an NFL veteran who also supported Trump during his first term. The former House Representative from Texas served because the first executive director of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council (WHORC).

The release said Turner: “Put an unprecedented effort that has transformed our nation’s most vulnerable communities. These efforts, undertaken in collaboration with former HUD Secretary Ben Carson, were maximized by Scott’s guidance in overseeing 16 federal agencies that implemented greater than 200 policy actions to support economic development.

Turner thanked President-elect Trump and his mentor Ben Carson in X’s post.

The nomination seems to come back at the fitting time. Many media outlets and social media users are questioning the shortage of Black representation in the subsequent administration’s cabinet. Especially since many black surrogates sided with Trump through the presidential campaign.

Trump’s most significant vocal deputy was Florida Congressman Byron Donalds. CNN’s Laura Coates spoke with Donalds and asked if Trump had really useful him for a cabinet position. Donalds denied feeling disrespected and continued to support the GOP’s election. The Congressman believes that achievement trumps diversity. He argues that the Biden administration has sacrificed progress for diversity, despite the fact that it has many victories on economic and social policy.

“The election of Donald Trump is approaching bringing competence and reality back to DC. within the White House, ensuring that the work gets done on behalf of the American people, no matter race, no matter religion or creed,” he said.

Turner’s nomination could decelerate the conversation concerning the lack of Black people entering the White House. The conversation is interesting since the Republican Party is not known for supporting diversity, equity and inclusion in any workplace. Attacks on DEI in Republican legislatures across the state may lead one to imagine that diversifying current mandates is the ultimate piece of a really broad conservative agenda.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

MAGA crowd criticizes Kamala Harris for taking a vacation to Hawaii as Karine Jean-Pierre shuts down a reporter who questions the vice president’s ‘downtime’

Published

on

By

Twelve years after his complete defeat by Republican Richard Nixon in the 1972 election, former Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern was asked how long it took him to get better.

“I’ll let you know when I get there” – South Dakota Democrat he joked.

So it stands to reason that Kamala Harris, who entered Election Day with an excellent probability and finished far behind Donald Trump in vote totals, could use a vacation.

'I want her to suffer a slow, painful death': Virginia man accused of threatening to set Kamala Harris on fire is surprised when federal agents raided his home 'after comment'
Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during the 88th National Convention of the American Federation of Teachers on July 25, 2024, in Houston, Texas. The American Federation of Teachers is the first union to endorse Harris for president since her campaign was announced. (Photo: Montinique Monroe/Getty Images)

“Part of the problem is that you’re running for 18 months straight,” said former Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis, who lost decisively to George H. W. Bush in 1988. “Your time clock is screwed up. “Walter Mondale told me that after he lost to (Ronald) Reagan (in 1984), he woke up at 2 a.m. for months.”

Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, arrived on Hawaii’s Big Island on Tuesday and plan to stay there until next week. The Federal Aviation Administration imposed temporary flight restrictions for “VIP Traffic” from 7:15 p.m. Tuesday until noon Monday.

A Harris aide told NBC News that the trip had already been delayed because the vice president wanted to be certain it would not be needed to break a tie in the U.S. Senate to confirm President Joe Biden’s judicial nominees.

Critics say the trip to Hawaii, a Thanksgiving tradition for Harris and her family, was ill-timed as “Europe prepares for World War III,” as Daily Mail headline on the vice president’s suggested vacation story.

Others say it isn’t a good idea for the vice president to flee to Hawaii while Democrats try to determine how to take care of the debt related to the $1 billion spent on the Harris/Walz ticket. The Democratic National Committee has already been forced to fire employees without severance pay.

Asked Thursday during his every day briefing whether President Biden was considering “optically” about Harris leaving Washington “when so many DNC staffers are literally wondering what they’re going to do,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre he argued downtime is deserved.

“The vice president took time off to spend time with her family,” she said. “I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that. (…) She’s worked very hard over the last four years, and the fact that she’s spending a few days with her family is good for her.”

But critics say Harris has had loads of time to recover from the defeat.

After securing the Democratic nomination, the vice president took several days off from the campaign, a contrast to Trump’s breakneck pace.

“No, I can not accept it. Who the hell is leaving? Trump said in October. “You have 14 days left and she is going to take a few more days off too. Do you recognize why? She’s lazy as hell and has that popularity.

While most individuals on social media supported Harris’ decision to take a break, MAGA showed no sympathy.

“She’s going to lose her job in about two months,” said one commentator on Program X. “She could definitely wait, especially since she took some time without work for the campaign after which a whole week to get better from it. I’m glad we didn’t find yourself with that lazy woman.

Others haven’t any problem with the vacation, but agree it was poorly timed.

“I do not think ‘a few days off’ is a problem, KJP. “This is the right time” said the commentator to X. “Its boss has just approved the escalation of the war in Ukraine, for example, and it looks like there is no such thing as a one in charge in the face of Putin’s threats. So possibly it’s good for her, but not for national security.

This article was originally published on : atlantablackstar.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending