Although the presidential election in 2028 is positioned 4 years and so they probably is not going to see any ads of candidates until a minimum of 2027, it doesn’t stop the democrats from considering who is the best shot to select up the White House after the end of the second term of office of President Donald Trump.

The new survey shows that some voters fall on who they might support in the potential presidential competition in 2028. Although it can’t be a surprise that the former vp of Kamala Harris, nominated for a democratic nomination in 2024, conducts a package of potential candidates, some could also be surprised after they learn that they learn that after the second second Congressionka New York Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

According to the University of Yale questionnaire27.5% of respondents stated that they might vote for Harris in a basic democratic, signaling the lasting popularity of the former vp amongst voters, despite her loss with Trump in the 2024 election in 2024. Ocasio-cortez at 21.3% is not too far behind her.

Other democrats who surveyed after Harris and Ocasio-Cortez, former US transport secretary (and former presidential candidate 2020) Pete Buttigieg (14%), governor of California Gavin Newsom (6.4%) and Governor of Pennsylvania Josh Shapiro (4.6%). Others on the list who surveyed the lower are: Senator Arizona Mark Kelly (3.6%), Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (3.3%), Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (3%), entrepreneur and investor Mark Cuban (3.2%), and even the host ESPN Stephen A. Smith (1%).

Ocasio-Cortez, tenderly known by her supporters as AOC, appearing in the Yale survey as the most vital pretender, is significant, considering her progressive identity in the Democratic Party. The 35-year-old legislator, who represents the majority of Black and Brown District in Bronx and Queens, rose to political fame during the basic elections in 2018, when the long-time representative Joe Crowley from the 14th District in New York didn’t occur. At that point, Ocasio-Cortez didn’t have political experience and worked especially as a bartender.

As she shared in the past, when she first entered the congress, and he was not accepted by the highest brass of her party. She also became a typical goal of President Donald Trump and the Republican party, which regularly indicated her support for the provisions on climate change generally known as Green New Deal and other progressive positions, comparable to Medicare for everybody.

But in recent years, the status and leadership of AOC in the Democratic Party on the Capitol hill has still evolved. Currently, he is a member of the Vice Ranking of the Committee for Supervision and Responsibility. The growing popularity of Ocasio-Cortez in the party can be the results of its anti-crumple concert tour “Fighting oligarchy” with the progressive independent senator Bern Sanders. Treasures collected tens of hundreds of voters for a visit, based on over 200,000, in accordance with New York Times.

Harris, who has more name recognition than the current variety of potential democratic presidential hopes, also appears more and is involved in voting. This week, she published a video emphasizing the Black Mother’s Health Week and urgency of motion.

“Because the Black Mother’s initiatives and women’s health research are attacked, our fight remains more important than ever. We continue the fight together so that every woman has access to healthcare”, which she needs “,,,” he said former vp.

Although Harris didn’t rule out one other president’s race, he also applies also to the candidacy of California governor in 2026.

NAACP suits the US Education Department about recent efforts to eliminate programs of diversity, justice and integration (Dei) in schools. IN federal criticism The organization submitted in Washington claims that the last directives of the Education Department are unconstitutional and discriminatory – especially for black students.

The criticism accommodates the administration of management programs that provide “real, integration curricula”, in addition to policies that expand access to selective educational opportunities for Black Americans and supporting belonging during racism in schools.

NAACP claims that the recent actions of the Department “develop incorrect interpretation” of federal regulations regarding civil rights and the precedent of the Supreme Court – activities that, according to the group, violate the rights of members to equal protection and are free from discrimination from the point of view based on the US structure.

President of Naacp Derrick Johnson he criticized this movementStating that the administration “effectively sanctions” the discrimination itself that the Act on US civil rights was designed to prevent

“The Education Department, whose task is to responsibility for protecting civil rights of all children, instead claims that system racism does not exist – effectively sanctioning discrimination itself that our regulations regarding civil rights have been prevented to prevent colorful children consistently participating in the segregated, chronic, non -nuisant schools in which they receive less educational and larger disciplines.” Johnson said.

“The refusal of these truths does not cause them to disappear,” he deepens harm, “he continued. “We ask the court for a fast motion at our request and we’ll proceed to be in favor of ensuring colourful students truthfully and fairly,” said Johson.

The heart of the lawsuit is the letter “Dear Colleague” of February 14 issued by the Education Department, instructing schools financed from federal funds so as to stop all considerations based on races in such areas as parties and scholarships. The letter on April 3 required schools to confirm that they were consistent-organizing some districts, resembling Waterloo, Iowa, to cancel dei initiatives and the risk of loss of financing.

Now NAACP is asking the court to block administration activities and restore support for programs promoting equality and integration education throughout the country.

US citizens are in the agenda of President Donald Trump, because the administration is considering a proposal to deport convicted Americans in prisons in El Salvador.

“Then they are native, home. You have to build five more places,” said Trump to the president of Salvador, Nayibo Bukele, before the press briefing on Monday.

According to NPR, Trump’s statement referred to the concept imprisonment of convicted US citizens In the prison space abroad, the idea Bukele suggested that the El Salvador was prepared for conduct.

“Yes, we have a place,” he said.

The US prosecutor General Pam Bondi actively examines whether American deportations to other countries could be legally solid and economical. “We also have others with whom we negotiate,” said Trump. “If he is a home criminal, I have no problem. Now we are studying rights now – I am learning. If we can do it, that’s good.”

While Trump’s ally Elon Musk and other conservatives agree with the concept of detaining US citizens abroad, some lawyers consider that the concept is “unconstitutional” and “illegal”.

“There is no authorization to deport US citizens in any American law, and certainly not imprison them in a foreign country,” said David Bier from the Cato Institute. “Of course, the problem is (Trump) he has already illegally deported hundreds of people, simply not giving the courts the opportunity to stop him.”

In February, Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) called on administration Reject the ideas of the proposal In a letter addressed to the US Department of State.

“It would be a moral and legal parody of the US government to submit to every” conditions of life Salvadors prisons, Ossoff wrote, noting that they don’t provide adequate sanitary, temperature control and clean water.

According to February post, Bukele on X, in exchange for a “relatively low” fee, Salvador suggested that he would take convicted criminals from the US to his terrorism, mega-herpison situated in Tecoluc.

Trump’s answer: “I would do it in the blink of an eye.”

Salvador supposedly already lives a whole bunch of individuals who have been transported from the United States to a jail with maximum security in recent weeks due to legal status and belonging to the gang.

In the past, the United States contested legal and constitutional barriers, imprisoning about 80,000 Japanese during World War II. Although the American Civil Liberties Union claimed that “you can’t deport the US citizen, dot”, the spokeswoman for the White House indicated in the press briefing of April 8 that Trump fully considers this concept.