Connect with us

Politics and Current

Donald Trump must be protected at all costs

Published

on

Donald Trump assassination attempt, Donald Trump, theGrio.com

“I can do it,” I said, lying like a prodigious fiddle.

I could feel my sisters, cousins, and friends sensing impending doom as we approached the meeting point for our rapidly scheduled afternoon meeting with Tony Trimble, the final word, unstoppable bully at Carolina Elementary. They had good reason to be concerned. Tony “Troublemaker” was not only larger, stronger, and older than me, but he also had a mustache. (To be fair, he had been left behind a couple of times.) Even kids in highschool had heard of Tony hitting someone so hard that he was ceaselessly condemned to ride the “short bus.” But after he hit me at the back of the pinnacle during a tornado drill earlier that day, I had no selection but to demand a likelihood to redeem my honor.

“At least let me get him in before he puts you in a belly to belly,” said White Ben (who had the identical name as a certain black kid nicknamed “Ben”). “Then we’ll all jump in.”

Advertisement

The black kids who commonly walked home together from our mostly white elementary school would stop and stare at the one white member of our after-school entourage. Even my sisters, who were very talented fighters, understood why White Ben’s proposal was absurd. After spending most of our lives in mostly black skin, we all naively assumed that the unwritten rules that governed mutual, prearranged hand-to-hand combat prolonged across cultural boundaries.

One on one. No jumping in. No holding back.

White Ben clearly didn’t know the principles. He was shocked when the black members of our after-school entourage unanimously rejected his plan to ambush Tony, but I understood his concerns. Who would laugh at his corny jokes if I used to be sentenced to the short bus? Despite my fears that my spinal cord would be blown to pieces, the black kids understood the duty. There was only a technique for me to regain my dignity and at last end Tony’s reign of terror. I didn’t necessarily should win the fight, but we all knew what I needed to do:

I had to present Tony a “fair assessment.”

Advertisement

This story is about Donald Trump

Just as my fellow Caucasian believed Tony was a threat to my circles, I imagine electing an election denier as president is a threat to democracy. Although I even have no insight Amber Rose’s researchI’ve seen enough evidence that the previous president is a racist. He’s a proven liarAND convicted criminals and rapist legalized by courtThat’s why I’m grateful to gravity, wind, MAGA Jesus and, most of all, the dedication, training and luck of the Secret Service.

When Trump narrowly dodged an assassin’s bullet at a campaign rally on Saturday, I breathed a sigh of relief. Whether it was Donald Trump’s John Wick-like reflexes, the would-be assassin’s imprecise aim, or simply a lucky coincidence, I’ll ceaselessly be grateful that a racist, lying, corrupt criminal wasn’t taken down by a random act of a lone gunman. Turning a racist, lying, corrupt criminal right into a tragic hero would be the worst possible consequence.

Featured Stories

I’d wish to pretend to have an altruistic, Martin Luther King-like belief in nonviolence, love, and human decency. But in a rustic founded by brutal revolution and an economy built on the obscene exploitation of labor through violence or the specter of violence, I could be accused of being anti-American or, worse, of promoting critical race theory. As flawed and unequal as America may be—and I’ve done my research—I imagine there is just one strategy to reclaim the dignity of this country and at last end Trump’s reign of terror:

Advertisement

I need an honest one.

Donald Trump is just a person who shouldn’t be superb at doing things. He has lost the favored vote in every election he has run in. Except white people and white evangelicals, the overwhelming majority of all others religious, ethnic and racial demographics vote against candidates from the party he controls. He is a “brilliant businessman” who has declared bankruptcy six times. He’s a “stable genius” who needed help from a wealthy daddy get accepted in college. Just because he enjoys the advantages of biased media coverage, supporters who don’t care in regards to the truth and financial assistance richest man on the earth doesn’t suggest he’ll win. He’s as human as Martin Van Buren, Millard Fillmore, George H. W. Bush or any of the previous presidents running for a second term who were told by voters, “No. We’re good.”

Despite the stories, tales, and myths which have created the legend of billionaire Sunny D-colored, Donald Trump shouldn’t be as dangerous as Trumpism. The Trump we all know represents an existing coalition of offended, entitled Americans who need to “take back their country.” The “take back” part defines that desire to reclaim the privilege historically granted to white men and girls. Trumpism is an effort to roll back every inch of racial progress and institutionalize a faith that reinforces their superiority. Donald Trump didn’t make them feel that way or create a philosophy; he is solely their avatar. He doesn’t care in regards to the “right to life” or wokeness any greater than Stalin cared about working-class economic equality. Even the repulsive Project 2025 is just a way to that end, a blueprint for authoritarian rule. But because the Bible says, says: “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face.”

My Bible is different.

Advertisement

And besides, killing people doesn’t work. Even if Trumpism is bad for democracy, making a martyr out of Trump won’t end the threat his movement poses to the country. A random white kid from a thrift store sitting on a roof with a robust, long-range killing machine shouldn’t be equipped to exterminate the bombastically incompetent but wronged Caucasian rage that Trump embodies. The assassination of Abraham Lincoln didn’t achieve John Wilkes’ StandThe goal is to stop the tip of racial slavery. Assassins have killed dozens of popes but Catholicism endures. Just as James Earl Ray’s rifle didn’t stop the Civil Rights Movement, so killing individuals is an ineffective tool for social, political, or economic change.

The will of the people is the one weapon that may succeed against Trumpism. We’ve tried the whole lot else. When we assumed that the justices—and I understand how crazy this sounds—the Supreme Court granted him almost universal immunity from the law. Judge Aileen Cannon someway decided that the Justice Department special prosecutor couldn’t prosecute him and convey him to justice. A conviction for a bribery offense couldn’t silence the convictions of his supporters. His trial for interference within the Georgia election won’t prevent him from being reelected. The judicial system is clearly an ineffective tool for holding some people legally accountable for his or her actions.

Most Republican Party legislators support Trump’s candidacy for president. Current House Speaker Mike Johnson is denying the elections Christian Nationalist who opposed vote countingSenate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell doesn’t have enough battery to oppose something without going into standby mode. In any case, two impeachment trials have already proven that the legislative branch is just as ill-equipped to stop America’s next supreme Fuhrer.

Even if the constitutionally mandated legal and legislative remedies effectively put an end to the prospect of a second Trump administration, Trump’s legion of American sycophants will simply dismiss it as “witch-hunt“or as an instance Biden is”weapon“Department of Justice. Trump’s battalion of suckers is here be careful Joe Biden, the Secret Service, local police, Antifa, hiring people from diverse backgrounds, and an armed 20-year-old with no special training and a rifle bought by parents 11 years ago ago they conspired to kill Trump.

Advertisement

They love playing the victim.

Anything that might stop Trump from his predetermined destiny would only embolden his base and ensure their conspiracy theories. To them, the impeachment process is the political equivalent of two houses of Congress doubling down on their hero. They hate it when someone steps in with truth, reality, or verified facts to attack their big, bad tyrant. No holding back. No doubling down. No stepping in.

I do not have the abilities to explain the enjoyment that erupted after I knocked out Tony “the Troublemaker” Trimble and ended his reign of terror, but that did not occur. Like most mixed martial arts matches within the elementary school division, we just threw punches and struggled until we were exhausted. I went home with an intact spinal cord, and Tony went back to what I assume was the Oval Office for tyrants. He didn’t even stop his campaign.

He went back to his threatening ways when my younger cousin Tyrant fought him the next yr. He continued to be a bully after my sister fought him. In fact, almost everyone who attended Carolina Elementary through the 17 or so years that I spent in sixth grade has a story in regards to the time they fought Tony Troublemaker. But to this present day, people will still discuss how Tony Trimble never lost a fight. And technically, they’re right. I didn’t beat him. Tony still caused trouble. That’s just the best way he was.

Advertisement

But he was not a tyrant.

Because we fought him.

Trump is a lying, racist, incompetent, wannabe dictator who lost an election. He is and all the time will be. And as we all know, there is totally nothing we will do to persuade his supporters that he’s a liar, racist, or an incompetent loser. But if the goal is to stop Trump from becoming President of the United States, then it shouldn’t matter what his supporters imagine. We’ve already proven that he can be defeated. We don’t need guns, bullets, or violence. We can just use our votes. And imagine me:

We have it.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Advertisement

Politics and Current

Black Democrats who attended Harvard and Candace Owens agree to one thing: the repression of the Trump campus goes too far

Published

on

By

This is a rare moment in American policy, when the ultra-conservative personality of Candace Owens Democrats are on the opposite side of Donald Trump. The political brand of the bonfire publicly condemned the president’s crusade against Harvard University and other university campus; Trump threatened to annul the billions of federal subsidies if the institution disagrees with the list of demands that Harvard described as “going beyond the power of the federal government.”

As Owens put it, Trump’s fight with Harvard – which increased to the federal lawsuit filed by the very wealthy Ivy league – is a struggle for freedom of speech.

Advertisement

“We cannot allow us to violate our rights. And if you think it will stop at university campus, you have no head,” said Owens, who previously supported President Trump. “So it’s better in this fight Harvard University. You should hope that they will overcome the Trump administration and this absurd definition.”

In his lawsuit, Harvard claims that their rights to the first amendment as a non-public institution are violated by the administration of Trump, who tried to force the university to meet their requirements regarding policies related to the solution to anti -Semitism in campus, in addition to other policies and reforms, corresponding to eliminating diversity, own capital and inclusion in principles, scholarship and honesty.

Apart from the violations of the first amendment, Edwards, a democrat applying for Congress in the 18th Congress District in Texas, said that her attempt to dismantle the Harvard of federal financing, which is used for research to increase innovation in medicine and technology, is especially disturbed.

A former member of the Houston City Council said that aiming administration on Harvard and other university campuses is “effective” and “irresponsible”.

Advertisement

Everton Blair, a graduate of Harvard University and Harvard Graduate School of Education, who also candidates for Congress in the thirteenth Congress District in Georgia, said that he “enjoys” that the institution “will be in a state of himself”.

However, Blair said that he was and remains to be critical of his home parent, because the problem with how they handled campus tensions during the war in gas and other matters – even when he was a student.

“It is a bit interesting that only because it violates their ability to be independently conducted institution, that it recalled this resistance,” said Blair, former chairman of the board of Gwinnett County Board of Education. “They showed me once and again that they have very peculiar cash interests.”

Blair noticed that Harvard, who has over $ 50 billion equipment, has a “privileged position” to find a way to “work fully, even if he loses billions of dollars”, unlike other campuses. He said that he shows that “not all we are simply forced and forced to do things that are bad for people, bad for students (and) for the community.”

Advertisement
Obama praises Harvard University for the defense of Trump despite the threat of financing USD 2.2 billion

Edwards said that the attacks of the first correction of Trump’s administration on Harvard “cannot be normalized”.

“These are dangerous practices that do not intend to develop us. It must be more than revenge and political punishment. What is happening in our academic institutions affects how tomorrow may be clear tomorrow,” said the candidate for Congress in Texas.

In the future, attacking American universities and universities will affect the “position in the world”, said Edwards, including “what we produce, available talent and information to which we have access”.

She added: “The precedent, which is established along with the Trump administration attack on a higher ED and other institutions that were very significant and valuable in our society … This is something that we have to repel with, because our future depends on this.”

Advertisement

(Tagstotransate) candia o Owens

This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

The federal judge abandons the case of corruption against the mayor of New York Eric Adams – essence

Published

on

By

The federal judge abandons the corruption case against the mayor of New York Eric Adams

Swimming pool images/ ghetto

Advertisement

The federal judge dismissed the corruption case against the mayor of New York Eric Adams. The decision of the US District Judge Dale Ho takes place almost two months after the controversial Trump administration, tried to desert the allegations of a democratic mayor.

Judge Ho threw the case “with prejudices”, which permanently prevents Department of Justice From refusal against Adams in the American District Court in Manhattan. In his ruling, the judge criticized the request for dismissal of the case without prejudices, which might allow for future prosecution, CNBC reports.

He expressed concern that such an exemption might be seen as a political opportunity, stating: “Everything here strikes the opportunity: releasing the indictment in exchange for concessions regarding the immigration policy” by Adams.

Advertisement

He argued that continuing the case could make Adams’ ability to manipulate and cooperate with the immigration policy of President Donald Trump. This attitude led to internal fights inside the TO, which resigned from several prosecutors, including the function of prosecutor Manhattan Danielle Sassoon.

Judge Ho emphasized the unprecedented nature of the reasoning of the state, noting: “The state does not cite any examples, and the court is not able to find any government rejecting the allegations against the selected official, because it would allow an official to facilitate the goals of federal policy.” ​

Adams, who didn’t plead guilty for the allegations, including bribery and fraud, maintained his innocence in all proceedings. After the release, he said: “This matter should never be brought and I did not do anything bad.” ​

The release allows Adams to concentrate on his re -election campaign. He faces pretenders, including the former governor Andrew Cuomo, in its offer for the second term. On Thursday The mayor announced that now it’ll be Start for recurring as an independent candidate.

Advertisement

“I strongly believe that this city is better served by truly independent leadership, and not leaders pulled by extremists on the left or extreme right, but instead rooted in a common middle, a place where the vast majority of New Yorkers are very planted,” said Adams.

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Susan Rice calls Pete HegeSeth “stupid as rock” in an interview with the podcast

Published

on

By

Susan Rice, Pete Hegseth


Susan Rice, a former national security advisor during the administration of President Barack Obama, was open, discussing what, in response to the Secretary of Defense Pete HegeSeth, as rumors, they spin about his future in Trump’s administration.

According to , During a conversation Thanks to the host “No Lie with BTC” Brian Taylor Cohen, Rice didn’t draw any blows when he described HegeSetha in unflattering categories, discussing some rainfall from the so -called signal controversy.

“Well, if you are a white Christian Cisgender Macho Maga, you can be as stupid as a rock and be considered a qualification to be the secretary of defense. We apparently learned this episode,” said Rice Cohen.

Advertisement

Rice continued, compiling the Trump’s concentration on combating diversity, equality and inclusion in how hegeSeth is just not eligible in her eyes.

“Dei was used as a suspension to suggest that anyone who is usually a woman is usually a color person, is usually a religious minority, might be disabled … he is usually a veteran of native origin, anyone who has used in any way, shapes or forms that we should always all treat and that we ought to be perceived on the basis of our substances, not discount, because we grow to be a lady or discount, That anyone should treat anyone.

According to Rice, he was a member of the Defense Policy Council until HegeSth allegedly removed the board members after a 45-day review On April 24, but time suggests that HegeSeth actually removed these members after indignant of right -wing influential in social media.

In an interview with Fox News, “Tucker Carlson, a dismissed adviser of HegeSeth, Dan Caldwell, mentioned that the management was currently involved in people who, according to Caldwell, were” extremely hostile “in the order of Donald Trump.

Caldwell called Rice specifically as a source of leaks in the HegeSetha Defense Department, for being blamed himself.

Advertisement

“She (Rice) and a group of other people who are extremely hostile to the president, and his worldview remain in the Defense Policy Council,” said Caldwell Carlson. “I would just say that if you want to look where the leaks come from, it would be a place where you can start.”

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell suggested in a press release that the changes reflect the values ​​and direction of Trump’s administration.

“Secretary of HegeSeth appreciates the efforts of members on behalf of the Department and the United States of America, but it is necessary to change to support the new strategic direction and political priorities of the department and ensure effective use of departmental resources,” said Parnell.

Advertisement

(Tagstranslate) National security

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending