The return of President Donald Trump to power in the White House in January left uncertainty for the movement of the justice reform in criminal matters to legalize marijuana. The status of legalization efforts has already been tightened during the administration of President Joe Biden, who refused to publicly support legalization, but continued to take critical steps towards federal decrimination.

Trump, whose hard crime program accommodates calls for drug dealers to face Capital punishmentHe publicly gave mixed signals about where he stands on marijuana. Despite the indication that the issue of legalization of marijuana needs to be left to countries-most of which adopted provisions regarding decriminalization or legalization of the drug-trump, during his first term he moved to cancel the Memorandum from the Obama era, which ordered federal prosecutors to not implement marijuana prosecutors in the states through which the drug is legal.

Trump’s administration has now inherited the ongoing trial of the federal government to alter marijuana from the schedule and to schedule III based on the Act on controlled substances – a movement initiated by President Joe Biden. The administrative court trial is infinite in sight; However, what is going on in the coming months, and possibly even years, will tell about where the movement goes to decriminate and legalize.

“Trump’s administration was not a priority yet … I do not know if at this moment he rises to the level of priorities to set anything forward,” said Cat Packer, director of drug markets and legal regulations in the Second Policy Alliance.

Doubts remain about the change of marijuana, which can occur in the near future, because each nominated by Trump and the duties of the Director for Drug Enforcement (DEA) discredit drugs in public. Acting Director Derek Maltz accused Biden about “placing politics above public security” with a choice to recommend a change in marijuana schedule. Terry Cole, nominated for Trump for DEA, has been repeatedly suggested Marijuana is a threat to community health, especially young people, despite research also showing some medical advantages.

“If Trump initiated or directed the process, this is probably the only way in which this process will be determined priority and performed,” said Packer.

There is at the very least some hope amongst the supporters that Trump can save the day due to movement to at the very least decriminalization of marijuana. As a presidential candidate in 2024 Trump expressed In the matter of social truth, he supported the move of Biden administration to alter the deadline, in addition to other reforms, comparable to decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana and provisions on protected banking for corporations authorized by the state. At that point, Trump announced that he would vote like a voting card in Florida, which might make a drug in Sunshine.

“We also need to implement intelligent recipes, while providing adult access to safe, tested products,” wrote Trump.

“This is a position that most Americans support regardless of their political affiliation. At this point, it seems that there is a disconnection between people and leadership,” she said.

According to SUCK STUDY The study in 2024. An enormous 88% of adults in the USA claims that marijuana needs to be legal for medical or recreational use.

Even if President Trump or Republicans in the Congress support some minor reforms related to banking, because they expressed interest on this, supporters are afraid that without federal decrimination or legalization of the Black and Brown community, they’ll proceed to feel the burden of enforcement of the crime.

Packer noticed that the south can be particularly “left” in the evolving marijuana industry without federal motion. For example, if President Trump really supports the decriminalization of marijuana’s possession, she said that he should use his presidential influence to “manage the congress to adopt a policy” that she would do.

“Most of the Black Americans live in the south, such as Texas, Florida and Georgia, where they still bear the burden of various damage,” she explained. “I do not know if without federal leadership, both in Congress and the MA of the ME Presidential Administration, this type of damage will not only be eliminated, but potentially sharpened when large immigrant communities are attacked.”

She added: “We can actually see reforms, but they can be those that prioritize profit, as opposed to public health, public security, consumer rights, human rights – and this is a problem.”

“In the past, President Trump has expressed openness to the reform of cannabis policy. Does the approach within his administration focused on the reform of the judiciary in criminal matters and the community reinvestment is to debate, but certainly economic potential can refer to his business instincts,” said Phillips.

She added: “I often hope that supporters are working on good cannabis policy at the state level, acting as the first line of defense in the protection of the rights of a small company (covering social capital operators) and maintaining the line to make sure that the withdrawal of politics no longer pay influence on black and brown communities.”

The former Congressmen Barbara Lee might be the next mayor of Oakland in California, which is a return to local management after greater than 20 years representing the city in Washington.

The Democrat veteran secured just over 50% of the votes, while Loren Taylor finished with nearly 45%, in keeping withSecretary of Voters of Alamed. Taylor officially awarded the race on Saturday, April 19, he ended as much as closely watched elections.

“Although I strongly believe in respecting the democratic voting and voting process, they will still be calculated … The results are clear that the inhabitants of Oakland chose me as the next mayor,” Lee said in a press release. “Thank you, Oakland!”

Lee, Trailblazer in progressive politics, withdrew from Congress last 12 months after the failed run of the US Senate. Her campaign for the mayor focused on the bridging of divisions in the city facing serious challenges.

“Oakland is a deeply divided city and I responded to the call to escape, unite our community – that I could represent every voter and we can all cooperate as one Oakland to solve our most burning problems,” she said in a press release made available on social media. She also thanked tons of of volunteers and approving who fueled her campaign, emphasizing efforts corresponding to 71 domestic events, 1000’s of shipyard marks and over 150,000 information of voters separated throughout the city.

In a press release published to X, Taylor congratulated Lee and confirmed the influence of his supporters. “Although the result was not the one we worked for and what we were counting on, I am incredibly proud of the race we were leading,” he wrote. “I pray that the mayor of Elect Lee meets his involvement in the unification of Oakland, genuinely engaging 47% of Oaklanders who voted for me and who want pragmatic leadership based on results.” He also noticed the bottom -up strength of his campaign, which, he said, pushed away from heavy expenses by political people from outside and trade unions.

The New York judge ordered municipal officials to detain a short lived plan to enabling federal immigration agents to act in the Rikers Island prison complex.

On Monday, judge Mary Rosado in a written order Forbade the city From “taking any steps in the direction of negotiations, signing or implementing all memorandum of arrangements with the federal government” before interrogation in April in the lawsuit questioning the plan.

The trial will give attention to a lawsuit filed last week by the New York City Council against the mayor Eric Adams. The claim is aimed toward blocking his last executive order Permission for immigration and enforcement and customs immigration (ICE) and other federal agencies for the maintenance of office space in the prison complex. The lawsuit and temporary detention are based on the challenge of the city council for the executive order of the mayor.

The lawsuit accuses Adams, a democrat, of the conclusion of the “corrupt opportunity Quid Pro Quo” with Trump’s administration in exchange for the Department of Justice, who abandoned him criminal charges against him. Adams repeatedly denied the conclusion of any agreement with the administration in a criminal case.

Adams said that the presence of ICE and other federal agencies in a jail complex would help them assist in investigations related to gangs and medicines, but that they may not have any role in enforcing civil immigration. On the nyc.gov website you’ll find press messages and official statements.

The mayor had previously announced that he would replace his first deputy mayor, Randy Mastro to cope with all decisions after returning Ice to the island of Rikers to “ensure that there has never been any conflict.” Mastro said last week that there have been discussions with the federal government regarding the plan.

ICE agents were previously present at the Rikers Island facility in East River. However, they were successfully banned in 2014. In accordance with the provisions regarding the Sanctuary in New York, which limit cooperation with the enforcement of immigration law. For more details about ICE, their website could be found here: https://www.ice.gov/

Republicans in Congress strive for several cities, often called “cities of the sanctuary” in reference to their policy restriction of cooperation with enforcement of immigration law. The mayors of Michelle Wu from Boston, Brandon Johnson from Chicago, Mike Johnston from Denver and Eric Adams from New York will appear on Wednesday before the Committee for Supervision and Government Reformation. The House Committee website for supervision and responsibility could be found here: https://oversight.House.gov/

There isn’t any strict definition of the sanctuary policy or the cities of the sanctuary, but the deadlines normally describe limited cooperation with immigration and customs enforcement (ICE). ICE enforces American immigration regulations throughout the country, but seeks state and native aid, especially in the case of enormous -scale deportations. ICE asks the police and sheriffs warn them about individuals who need to deport and stop until federal officers don’t take care.

But some cities and countries say that cooperation with ice means crime victims and witnesses who usually are not in the US won’t appear legally. And, to various degrees, officials say that they need their places to be welcomed by immigrant places.