Connect with us

Technology

Women in AI: MP Dar’shun Kendrick wants to pass more AI legislation

Published

on

Dar

To give women AI academics and others their well-deserved – and overdue – time in the highlight, TechCrunch is publishing a series of interviews specializing in the extraordinary women who’re contributing to the AI ​​revolution. We’re publishing these articles all year long because the AI ​​boom continues, highlighting key work that usually goes unnoticed. Read more profiles here.

Dar’shun Kendrick is Member positions of the Georgia House of Representatives she has been chosen in 2010 she was 27 years old. She has an intensive profession in policy, equal opportunity and technology, including on the Committee on Small Business Development and Job Creation and the Committee on Technology and Infrastructure, where she is involved in the Subcommittee on Artificial Intelligence. She also worked with the National Black Caucus of State Legislators, the Telecommunications, Science and Technology Committee, and in 2019 created the primary bipartisan Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Caucus in the Georgia House of Representatives.

Kendrick attended Oglethorpe University and received her law degree from the University of Georgia School of Law. She is a lawyer and in 2017 it was opened law firm and investment consulting to help women and black founders learn more about raising capital.

Briefly speaking, how did you start in artificial intelligence? What drew you to the sphere?

I began my adventure with artificial intelligence with a broad interest in technology. I’m a securities lawyer, so I help founders across the country raise billions in private investment capital, and I also advise VC funds. Therefore, due to my “day job”, I all the time hear about and have interaction in capital raises using the most recent technologies.

I used to be, and proceed to be, drawn to AI due to how interesting it’s for a policymaker to balance making people’s lives easier while ensuring that machine learning doesn’t disrupt our democracy and what makes us human. As a lawyer, I’m also interested in this because VCs and founders in the AI ​​space seem to be bucking the recent trend of not raising as much investor capital as other subsets of technology. I do not know why that is obligatory and that is what makes it fascinating.

What work in AI are you most pleased with?

During the last legislative session of the Georgia General Assembly, I served on a small subcommittee on artificial intelligence that passed legislation regarding the upcoming election and “deep fraud” by political campaigns to influence the election.

This is only the start, but I’m proud that the state of Georgia has began having these conversations. The government tends to be years behind in catching up with emerging technology, so I’m glad we’re starting to take a look at every little thing related to AI – especially generative AI.

How do you cope with the challenges of the male-dominated tech industry, and by extension, the male-dominated AI industry?

Show up. I show up in spaces where these male-dominated industries would not expect me to be seen – events, conferences, discussions, etc. It’s the identical way I managed to break into the male-dominated enterprise capital industry: I just showed up knowing what I used to be talking about. I say and providing something of value that the industry needs.

What advice would you give to women wanting to start working in the AI ​​industry?

Produce. Women are used to multitasking. In my opinion, that is top-of-the-line applications of generative and applied artificial intelligence. So I do know that ladies can produce a brand new AI-based product that may make life easier because we’re those who need it. You haven’t got to develop a product – you only need to be a visionary. Someone else can construct it. Show up. There are only so many spaces we will steer clear of. Continue learning. Technology changes so quickly. You want to give you the chance to provide value each time the chance arises and also you enter this space, so listen to YouTube and enroll to receive emails from someone talking about this space.

What are essentially the most pressing issues facing artificial intelligence because it evolves?

Fraud. Whenever a brand new technology comes along, someone is sneaky and cunning enough to discover a way to use it for evil. Particularly due to artificial intelligence, essentially the most vulnerable communities, resembling the elderly and immigrant populations, can be targeted. Privacy. A story as old as time and continued thanks to artificial intelligence. As you feed the AI ​​machine more details about yourself, the higher it’ll turn out to be.

The downside is that it now knows and stores quite a lot of details about you. Data breaches occur on a regular basis. Hacking is one thing. So it is a problem. Adaptation for small businesses. Government, legal field, financial services. All of those industries tend to be more conservative and slower to adapt to latest technologies. However, in this dynamic world, slow use of AI is a recipe for small business failure. Government and company partners must find ways to train enterprises to respond to the changing technology and business development landscape resulting from AI.

What issues should AI users pay attention to?

Now you could have to second-guess every little thing due to the scam, and you could have to be picky in regards to the information you share with AI platforms. Additionally, users should know that AI technology is just as effective as human input. So there remains to be the potential for discrimination – consider artificial intelligence in job applications – which will result from its use.

What is the easiest way to construct AI responsibly?

Develop a written ethical framework with “DO’S and DON’T’s” that give attention to privacy, data security, anti-fraud measures, and continuous reassessment of discrimination issues in the system. Write down this ethical framework, share it together with your team, and stick to it.

How can investors higher promote responsible AI?

(See above) and with severance pay. In particular, firms that claim to be focused on ESG (environmental, social and governance) hold them accountable by asking the precise questions, requiring a written ethics plan and setting metrics to truly exhibit their ESG investment.

What all of us – the federal government, the private sector and individuals – need to do is to strike a balance pretty quickly between the innovations that I really like as America’s trademark and the rights – the precise to privacy, the precise to liberty, the precise to due process and nondiscrimination. The sooner we understand this balance and act, the higher we can be as a rustic and a world.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

MIT Develops Recyclable 3D-Printed Glass Blocks for Construction Applications

Published

on

By

MIT develops recyclable 3D-printed glass blocks for construction

The use of 3D printing has been praised as an alternative choice to traditional construction, promising faster construction times, creative design and fewer construction errors, all while reducing the carbon footprint. New research from MIT points to an interesting latest approach to the concept, involving the usage of 3D-printed glass blocks in the form of a figure eight, which may be connected together like Lego bricks.

The team points to glass’s optical properties and “infinite recyclability” as reasons to pursue the fabric. “As long as it’s not contaminated, you can recycle glass almost infinitely,” says assistant professor of mechanical engineering Kaitlyn Becker.

The team relied on 3D printers designed by Straight line — is itself a spin-off of MIT.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Introducing the Next Wave of Startup Battlefield Judges at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024

Published

on

By

Announcing our next wave of Startup Battlefield judges at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024

Startup Battlefield 200 is the highlight of every Disrupt, and we will’t wait to search out out which of the 1000’s of startups which have invited us to collaborate can have the probability to pitch to top enterprise capitalists at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024. Join us at Moscone West in San Francisco October 28–30 for an epic showdown where everyone can have the probability to make a major impact.

Get insight into what the judges are in search of in a profitable company as they supply detailed feedback on the evaluation criteria. Don’t miss the opportunity to learn from their expert insights and discover the key characteristics that result in startup success, only at Disrupt 2024.

We’re excited to introduce our next group of investors who will evaluate startups and dive into each pitch in an in-depth and insightful Q&A session. Stay tuned for more big names coming soon!

Alice Brooks, Partner, Khosla Ventures

Alicja is a partner in Khosla’s ventures interests in sustainability, food, agriculture, and manufacturing/supply chain. She has worked with multiple startups in robotics, IoT, retail, consumer goods, and STEM education, and led mechanical, electrical, and application development teams in the US and Asia. She also founded and managed manufacturing operations in factories in China and Taiwan. Prior to KV, Alice was the founder and CEO of Roominate, a STEM education company that helps girls learn engineering concepts through play.

Mark Crane, Partner, General Catalyst

Mark Crane is a partner at General Catalysta enterprise capital firm that works with founders from seed to endurance to assist them construct corporations that may stand the test of time. Focused on acquiring and investing in later-stage investment opportunities equivalent to AuthZed, Bugcrowd, Resilience, and TravelPerk. Prior to joining General Catalyst, Mark was a vice chairman at Cove Hill Partners in Massachusetts. Prior to that, he was a senior associate at JMI Equity and an associate at North Bridge Growth Equity.

Sofia Dolfe, Partner, Index Ventures

Sofia partners with founders who use their unique perspective and private understanding of the problem to construct corporations that drive behavioral change, powerful network effects, and transform entire industries, from grocery and e-commerce to financial services and healthcare. Sofia can also be one of Index projects‘ gaming leads, working with some of the best gaming corporations in Europe, making a recent generation of iconic gaming titles. He spends most of his time in the Nordics, but works with entrepreneurs across the continent.

Christine Esserman, Partner, Accel

Christine Esserman joined Acceleration in 2017 and focuses on software, web, and mobile technology corporations. Since joining Accel, Christine has helped lead Accel’s investments in Blackpoint Cyber, Linear, Merge, ThreeFlow, Bumble, Remote, Dovetail, Ethos, Guru, and Headway. Prior to joining Accel, Christine worked in product and operations roles at multiple startups. A native of the Bay Area, Christine graduated from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania with a level in Finance and Operations.

Haomiao Huang, Founding Partner, Matter Venture Partners

Haomiao from Venture Matter Partners is a robotics researcher turned founder turned investor. He is especially obsessed with corporations that bring digital innovation to physical economy enterprises, with a give attention to sectors equivalent to logistics, manufacturing and transportation, and advanced technologies equivalent to robotics and AI. Haomiao spent 4 years investing in hard tech with Wen Hsieh at Kleiner Perkins. He previously founded smart home security startup Kuna, built autonomous cars at Caltech and, as part of his PhD research at Stanford, pioneered the aerodynamics and control of multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles. Kuna was part of the Y Combinator Winter 14 cohort.

Don’t miss it!

The Startup Battlefield winner, who will walk away with a $100,000 money prize, can be announced at Disrupt 2024—the epicenter of startups. Join 10,000 attendees to witness this breakthrough moment and see the next wave of tech innovation.

Register here and secure your spot to witness this epic battle of startups.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

India Considers Easing Market Share Caps for UPI Payments Operators

Published

on

By

phonepe UPI being used to accept payments at a road-side sunglasses stall.

The regulator that oversees India’s popular UPI rail payments is considering relaxing a proposed market share cap for operators like Google Pay, PhonePe and Paytm because it grapples with enforcing the restrictions, two people accustomed to the matter told TechCrunch.

The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), which is regulated by the Indian central bank, is considering increasing the market share that UPI operators can hold to greater than 40%, said two of the people, requesting anonymity because the knowledge is confidential. The regulator had earlier proposed a 30% market share limit to encourage competition within the space.

UPI has change into the most well-liked option to send and receive money in India, with the mechanism processing over 12 billion transactions monthly. Walmart-backed PhonePe has about 48% market share by volume and 50% by value, while Google Pay has 37.3% share by volume.

Once an industry heavyweight, Paytm’s market share has fallen to 7.2% from 11% late last yr amid regulatory challenges.

According to several industry executives, the NPCI’s increase in market share limits is more likely to be a controversial move as many UPI providers were counting on regulatory motion to curb the dominance of PhonePe and Google Pay.

NPCI, which has previously declined to comment on market share, didn’t reply to a request for comment on Thursday.

The regulator originally planned to implement the market share caps in January 2021 but prolonged the deadline to January 1, 2025. The regulator has struggled to seek out a workable option to implement its proposed market share caps.

The stakes are high, especially for PhonePe, India’s Most worthy fintech startup, valued at $12 billion.

Sameer Nigam, co-founder and CEO of PhonePe, said last month that the startup cannot go public “if there is uncertainty on regulatory issues.”

“If you buy a share at Rs 100 and value it assuming we have 48-49% market share, there is uncertainty whether it will come down to 30% and when,” Nigam told a fintech conference last month. “We are reaching out to them (the regulator) whether they can find another way to at least address any concerns they have or tell us what the list of concerns is,” he added.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending