Calling what is occurring online “fire” doesn’t even start to elucidate what is occurring during the trade war between the United States and China. Gloves have dropped out since President Donald Trump threatened to use as much as 125% tariffs to all Chinese imports. Now producers in China are exposing American brands for what they call “hypocrisy” amongst the trade war.

When issuing American brands, a few of the largest producers in China claim that although American corporations claim that they’re “produced in the US”, they quietly produce goods in Chinese factories. According to movies published on Tiktok, a few of these alleged great names are Michael Kors, a handbag coach, Levi jeans and Lulhed.

According to 1 creator of the brand content, they run away from marking things as “made in America” ​​or “Made in Welies”. For example, most bags are produced in China before it is distributed to a designer or brand. The designer will add ending or logo, enabling brands to characterize items as “produced” in response to the country.

“I am surprised that more people do not know this. The quality of Chinese products is equally good,” said the creator of Tiktok. “We have always had the assumption that Chinese goods are not good, but all this is propaganda.”

In one other film, published by China Yiw Factor, says that Birkenstocks is just USD 10 and asks people to contact him in the event that they need to cooperate with him.

Consumers corresponding to Chinese producers revealing American brands

One person published on China Yiwu Factor: “Chinese producers are driving luxury brands is my new favorite tiktok.”

Other people praise Chinese producers for “playing chess”, while Trump “plays him in fish” and encourages these producers to directly sell to consumers.

The escalating trade war between the United States and China appears after Trump said that there’s an imbalance of trade between two nations. He said that America has bought lots from China for years, but it surely was not reciprocated, reports. Trump said American Company goes beyond compliance with the rules of the communist party, But Chinese corporations haven’t got the same barriers.

His second argument concerns national security. America is predicated on China in terms of electronic chips, pharmaceutical components and rare lands. However, China has recently suspended the critical export of rare lands, and American corporations do not need an alternate supplier.

Tariffs are an try to make China negotiating friendly trade principles with the United States. If this doesn’t work, Trump’s administration hopes that it forces corporations to seek out other places, mainly in the United States, to amass and create their products.

While China is the major exporter to the USA, this is not any longer the first. The United States sent a record export of dollars to China to China in 2024. China, on the other hand, He exported $ 463 billion in goods and services to the United States, Third behind Mexico and Canada, Associated Pressreported.

The best export in the USA to China in 2024 included soy, planes, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Last 12 months, the major export from China included cell phones, computers, toys and clothing.

The Republican Congressmen of Tennessee jumped on an early role in the race for the most Trump-Sykophantic member of the American Chamber of Representatives.

US representative Andy Ogles, who had previously introduced the provisions that would give President Donald Trump to the Appendix to the Greenland attachment, proposed Bill This will change the twenty second amendment, which establishes the current two -sided limit for presidents.

The Ogles act would allow each president to take the third term if their first two dates weren’t consistent. In the history of America, only two presidents met with this threshold: Donald Trump and Grover Cleveland, who lost their re -election offer with Benjamin Harrison in 1888, but won the rematch 4 years later.

“It is necessary to provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the catastrophic course specified by the Biden administration,” said Ogles in a press release. “He is devoted to the restoration of the Republic and saving our country, and we, as the legislator and as the state, must do everything in our power to support it.”

Ogles’s plan prohibits the third term, if the first two were subsequent – which implies former presidents of Bush, Obama and Clinton, they may not search for a return to the office. The bill would also deny the third full term of office for anyone who served over two years of someone’s term.

Here is 22. Amendment, in her present country:

“No person will be elected to the office of the president more than twice, and no person who was the president of the president or acted as a president, for over two years of a term of office, to which some other person was elected, he will be elected to the office of the president more than once.”

Ratified in 1951. The amendment took place after Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt ran to the election in 1932 and won the elected 3 times before, which makes him the only president who served greater than two terms. And yes, these were further conditions.

Now the metamover Ogles is proposed, which is just not ever happened:

“No person will be elected to the office of the president more than three times, nor will he be elected for any additional term after election for two subsequent conditions, and no person who held the office of the president or acted as the president, for over two years of the term to which another person will be elected to the office of president more than twice.”

Ogles amendment would require the approval of two -thirds of each Congress houses and three -quarters of countries which are to be ratified, which should explain why our structure has so few changes.

As Axios noted in his report, the act served as “the deep’s deep tag, which he enjoys the new president at the GOP house.”

Ogles is a member of the Chamber of Freedom Caucus, consisting of Trump’s most loyal loyalists. But there may be one more reason why Congresmen Tennessee is so difficult to be Trump’s biggest licking.

He is examined By House Ethics Committee regarding the discrepancy in its disclosure of campaign financing – particularly in relation to a private loan of USD 320,000, which was reported by the Federal Electoral Commission. Ogles, who pushed last yr Provisions regarding the sending of protesters of pro-Palestinian students He later modified the disclosure to Gaza as a “penalty” that reduced a private loan to USD 20,000. He refused to cooperate with the federal probe.

Review of the Congress Ethics Office stated that “there was an important reason to think that Rep. Ogles omitted or misled the required information” about his financial disclosure.

In addition, the assessment stated “an important reason to think that the Ogles REP. Campaign Committee could accept an excessive contribution that was reported as personal loans and candidate contributions.”

“I do not think that he wanted to talk about fraud regarding the financing of the campaign, which he is accused and would like us to focus on what Trump syndrome is,” said the democratic representative of Becca Balint with Vermont Axios. “Really pathetic. Tennessee voters deserve a lot better.

In a press release, a colleague from Tennessan Steve Cohen, a democrat, wrote: “2 terms are sufficient chaos for every nation to survive.”

Each of them is unlikely to cause serious damage to Ogles’s political profession. He easily won the re -election in 2024 despite ethical scandal and many other scandals, including false statements About his skilled and educational origin and about what happened $ 25,000 collected at Gofundme for a kid’s funeral garden, which never materialized.

During the CNN town hall with members of the Congress on Thursday, US representative Jahan Hayes, D-conn., Tried to persuade why Americans must be seriously concerned concerning the above-average role of Elon Musk, the richest person on this planet, plays within the federal government.

“You have the right to worry about Elon Musk, because he is an unrequited billionaire who has a huge impact,” said Hayes during a double -sided panel with a democratic representative of Derek Treem from California and republican representatives Mike Lawler from New York and Ryan Mackenzie from Pennsylvania.

Congressmenka Hayes, which was elected to the House of US representatives in 2018, called on the dearth of transparency of Trump’s administration in Musk’s work as the top of the dog. The department sanctioned by the White House, he managed the administration’s efforts to eliminate government waste and fraud, which caused the detention or annulled billions of dollars, and 1000’s of presidency employees dismissed or resolved. Many administration activities remain questioned within the Federal Court.

Hayes noticed that Trump’s administration stated in court that Musk was not chargeable for Doge, despite President Trump and other officials claiming that he was the top of the department, and conducts his decisions or recommendations. “They tried to hide the ball,” she said.

Congressmenka said that if Doge Muska really finds evidence of waste and government fraud, then he and his team should testify before Congress and present them. “Spread this, not through a series of tweets, and not through these unverified reports that it publishes,” said Hayes. She said that it was “very special” that “7,000 social insurance employees are exempt, 6,000 from the veterans’ administration is exempt (but) his company receives more contracts and earns more money from the federal government every day.”

Rep. Hayes identified that the satellite company Muska, Starlink, has now Server within the White House And he argued that the musk is “serious”. She continued: “Nobody even calls him for settlement … Everyone should worry about it. This is not normal. It is not regular that one person has this type of access to every agency, people data, security systems.”

Rep. Jahana Hayes raised concerns @Elon Musk Growing federal agreements and profits, questioning the dearth of responsibility and supervision – especially with Starlink, which is currently working within the White House.@Repjahanhayes @kaitlancolls pic.twitter.com/wnhuju9w5v

– Asmat Mallick (@asmatmallick) April 11, 2025

When rep. Lawler tried to defend Musk and Doge, arguing that their work is supported and supported by civilian officials, Hayes interrupted and asked sharply: “Who are they?” She repeated the query several times when Lawler spoke, apparently as a tactic to attract an argument, which Democrats repeatedly undergo the topic of transparency about what Musk, who is just not a government worker, performs with data that collects and protects privacy rights.

“I am not sure if the republican conference received a list of employees in Doge because we did not do it. So the information was not available to us,” Hayes said. “If there are employees, career, federal employees who work in the system to find this information, we would like to share it with us.”

Hayes, who was awarded the “Teacher of the Year” within the White House by President Barack Obama in 2016, before applying for Congress, also condemned the activities of the Trump administration to dismantle the US Education Department. Despite the repetitive claims of Trump officials and Republicans that the dismantling of the department would reflect “power” back to state and native rule, Congressmenka noted that “public education is already served by you.”

The “Department of Education protects civil rights of students,” she explained, mentioning the Doe services, including the enforcement of provisions on anti -discrimination to guard coloured students and disabled students, in addition to managing the federal student loan system and federal grant and subsidies.

“Children who will be most injured are children in poor and low income of the community,” she said. “So when people say … that something has been received, I do not know if they are asking for discrimination, the possibility of refusing to protect civil rights to poor students (or) without adequate financing and teachers to serve them.”

The Education Department protects civil rights of scholars, prepares teachers, serves student loans and our Pell subsidies – they don’t rule the curriculum or instructional materials within the state, which already belongs to the States. Acious so when people say it … pic.twitter.com/odh7wedvcp

– Jahana Hayes (@Repjahanhayes) April 11, 2025