Connect with us

Technology

Tyler Perry Pauses $800 Million Studio Expansion Due to OpenAI

Published

on

Tyler Perry, Atlanta, Studio

Tyler Perry is putting plans for an $800 million studio expansion on hold due to the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence he’s witnessed.


Tyler Perry is putting his $800 million studio expansion plans on hold due to the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence he’s witnessing.

After seeing the facility of OpenAI’s recent text-to-video processing model, filmmaker heavyweight Sora decided to hold off on expanding his massive 330-acre studio in Atlanta, which might have added 12 recent sound stages. According to Perry tested released a brand new AI product after its February 15 debut and believes the advanced technology will help its productions avoid traveling to locations or constructing sets.

Advertisement

“Hearing that he could do it all was one thing, but seeing his capabilities was mind-blowing,” Perry said.

Serving on each ends of the spectrum helps Perry see the advantages and threats Sora poses to the entertainment industry. As a business owner, the creator sees the potential of those technological advances. But as an employer, actor and filmmaker, Perry can also be sounding the alarm about potential dangers.

“There have to be some laws to protect us. If not, I just don’t see how we’ll survive,” he said.

Perry admits that plans to expand his production studio have been placed on hold “indefinitely” due to the capabilities of the brand new Sora tool. The billionaire media mogul is keeping a detailed eye on the emerging OpenAI wave and expected changes within the industry, but not to the extent he has recently witnessed.

“Over the last 12 months or so I’ve been hearing that something like this was coming, but I had no idea until I recently saw an indication of what it could do. It’s shocking to me,” Perry said.

Advertisement

Sora is a newly introduced character product OpenAI, an American research organization coping with artificial intelligence. It serves as a man-made intelligence model that enables users to create realistic and imaginative scenes by simply entering instructions.

Launched on February 15, Perry underwent initial testing that left him each surprised and in awe of its capabilities.

“If I wanted to be in the snow in Colorado, I would choose texting. If I wanted to write a scene on the moon, it would be text, and artificial intelligence can generate it like nothing,” he described, adding how the brand new technology would help reduce production costs.

“I do not have to install the kit on my property. I can sit in an office and do it on a pc, which is shocking to me,” he said.

Advertisement

Perry sees what an enormous change OpenAI might be within the entertainment industry – and admits it could end in job losses.

“I am very, very concerned that many jobs will be lost in the near future,” he said. “I really, really feel this very strongly.”

In September, Hollywood writers and actors ended considered one of the longest strikes in history after reaching a tentative agreement that included protections against the rising tide of artificial intelligence. Under the brand new terms, studios “cannot use artificial intelligence to write scripts or edit scripts that have already been written by a writer,” said comedian Adam Conover. The deal also prevents studios from using AI-generated content as “source material” that they might commission writers to adapt in exchange for reduced pay and fewer credit compared to a very original script.

However, given Perry’s latest revelations and the issues surrounding the studio’s expansion, this might function a preview of what is to come for your entire industry.

Advertisement


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

One of the last AI Google models is worse in terms of safety

Published

on

By

The Google Gemini generative AI logo on a smartphone.

The recently released Google AI model is worse in some security tests than its predecessor, in line with the company’s internal comparative test.

IN Technical report Google, published this week, reveals that his Flash Gemini 2.5 model is more likely that he generates a text that violates its security guidelines than Gemini 2.0 Flash. In two indicators “text security for text” and “image security to the text”, Flash Gemini 2.5 will withdraw 4.1% and 9.6% respectively.

Text safety for the text measures how often the model violates Google guidelines, making an allowance for the prompt, while image security to the text assesses how close the model adheres to those boundaries after displaying the monitors using the image. Both tests are automated, not supervised by man.

Advertisement

In an e-mail, Google spokesman confirmed that Gemini 2.5 Flash “performs worse in terms of text safety for text and image.”

These surprising comparative results appear when AI is passing in order that their models are more acceptable – in other words, less often refuse to answer controversial or sensitive. In the case of the latest Llam Meta models, he said that he fought models in order to not support “some views on others” and answers to more “debated” political hints. Opeli said at the starting of this yr that he would improve future models, in order to not adopt an editorial attitude and offers many prospects on controversial topics.

Sometimes these efforts were refundable. TechCrunch announced on Monday that the default CHATGPT OPENAI power supply model allowed juvenile to generate erotic conversations. Opeli blamed his behavior for a “mistake”.

According to Google Technical Report, Gemini 2.5 Flash, which is still in view, follows instructions more faithfully than Gemini 2.0 Flash, including instructions exceeding problematic lines. The company claims that regression might be partially attributed to false positives, but in addition admits that Gemini 2.5 Flash sometimes generates “content of violation” when it is clearly asked.

Advertisement

TechCrunch event

Berkeley, California
|.
June 5

Book now

Advertisement

“Of course, there is a tension between (after instructions) on sensitive topics and violations of security policy, which is reflected in our assessment,” we read in the report.

The results from Meepmap, reference, which can examine how models react to sensitive and controversial hints, also suggest that Flash Gemini 2.5 is much less willing to refuse to reply controversial questions than Flash Gemini 2.0. Testing the TechCrunch model through the AI ​​OpenRoutter platform has shown that he unsuccessfully writes essays to support human artificial intelligence judges, weakening the protection of due protection in the US and the implementation of universal government supervisory programs.

Thomas Woodside, co -founder of the Secure AI Project, said that the limited details given by Google in their technical report show the need for greater transparency in testing models.

“There is a compromise between the instruction support and the observation of politics, because some users may ask for content that would violate the rules,” said Woodside Techcrunch. “In this case, the latest Flash model Google warns the instructions more, while breaking more. Google does not present many details about specific cases in which the rules have been violated, although they claim that they are not serious. Not knowing more, independent analysts are difficult to know if there is a problem.”

Advertisement

Google was already under fire for his models of security reporting practices.

The company took weeks to publish a technical report for the most talented model, Gemini 2.5 Pro. When the report was finally published, it initially omitted the key details of the security tests.

On Monday, Google published a more detailed report with additional security information.

(Tagstotransate) Gemini

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Aurora launches a commercial self -propelled truck service in Texas

Published

on

By

The autonomous startup of the Aurora Innovation vehicle technology claims that it has successfully launched a self -propelled truck service in Texas, which makes it the primary company that she implemented without drivers, heavy trucks for commercial use on public roads in the USA

The premiere appears when Aurora gets the term: In October, the corporate delayed the planned debut 2024 to April 2025. The debut also appears five months after the rival Kodiak Robotics provided its first autonomous trucks to clients commercial for operations without a driver in field environments.

Aurora claims that this week she began to freight between Dallas and Houston with Hirschbach Motor Lines and Uber Freight starters, and that she has finished 1200 miles without a driver to this point. The company plans to expand to El Paso and Phoenix until the top of 2025.

Advertisement

TechCrunch contacted for more detailed information concerning the premiere, for instance, the variety of vehicles implemented Aurora and whether the system needed to implement the Pullover maneuver or the required distant human assistance.

The commercial premiere of Aurora takes place in a difficult time. Self -propelled trucks have long been related to the necessity for his or her technology attributable to labor deficiencies in the chairman’s transport and the expected increase in freigh shipping. Trump’s tariffs modified this attitude, not less than in a short period. According to the April analytical company report from the commercial vehicle industry ACT researchThe freight is predicted to fall this yr in the USA with a decrease in volume and consumer expenditure.

Aurora will report its results in the primary quarter next week, i.e. when he shares how he expects the present trade war will affect his future activity. TechCrunch contacted to learn more about how tariffs affect Auror’s activities.

For now, Aurora will probably concentrate on further proving his safety case without a driver and cooperation with state and federal legislators to just accept favorable politicians to assist her develop.

Advertisement

TechCrunch event

Berkeley, California
|.
June 5

Book now

Advertisement

At the start of 2025, Aurora filed a lawsuit against federal regulatory bodies after the court refused to release the appliance for release from the protection requirement, which consists in placing warning triangles on the road, when the truck must stop on the highway – something that’s difficult to do when there isn’t a driver in the vehicle. To maintain compliance with this principle and proceed to totally implement without service drivers, Aurora probably has a man -driven automotive trail after they are working.

(Tagstranslate) Aurora Innovation

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Sarah Tavel, the first woman of the Benchmark GP, goes to the Venture partner

Published

on

By

Eight years after joining Benchmark as the company’s first partner, Sarah Tavel announced that she was going to a more limited role at Hapeure Venture.

In his latest position as a partner Venture Tavel will proceed to invest and serve existing company boards, but may have more time to examine “AI tools on the edge” and fascinated with the direction of artificial intelligence, she wrote.

Tavel joined Benchmark in 2017 after spending a half years as a partner in Greylock and three years as a product manager at Pinterest. Before Pinterest, Tavel was an investor in Bessemer Venture Partners, where she helped Source Pinterest and Github.

Advertisement

Since its foundation in 1995, the benchmark intentionally maintained a small team of six or fewer general partners. Unlike most VC corporations, wherein older partners normally receive most of the management and profits fees, the benchmark acts as an equal partnership, and all partners share fees and returns equally.

During his term as a general partner of Benchmark, Tavel invested in Hipcamp on the campsite, chains of cryptocurrency intelligence startups and the Supergreaty cosmetic platform, which was purchased by Whatnot in 2023. Tavel also supported the application for sharing photos of Paparazhi, which closed two years ago, and the AI ​​11x sales platform, about which TechCrunch wrote.

(Tagstotransate) benchmark

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending