Health and Wellness

Op-Ed: The Case for Abortion – From a Pastor

Published

on

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

While Black church members and leaders offer many good reasons for supporting the candidacy and platform of the incoming Kamala Harris-Tim Walz administration, we actually should say more about reproductive autonomy being the most effective reasons for supporting the Democratic presidential candidacy. My intention is to reveal that, from my perspective as a pastor providing pastoral care, there are moral reasons to incorporate abortion care as a part of comprehensive health care, as Harris and Walz encouraged us to do.

One of the truly humbling points of pastoral ministry is the invitation to bear witness to the lives of the faithful of their most vulnerable moments. In joy and particularly in pain, the spiritual flock seeks its shepherd to wish, to listen, sometimes to advise, but above all simply to be present and to be a witness. Often there may be nothing we will do to make the situation right and even higher, but our members still want us to know what they’re going through.

And precisely because I’m a pastor and have witnessed to the complexities and struggles of the lives of my congregants, I stand firmly and decisively for reproductive autonomy and oppose government intrusion and interference within the reproductive decisions made by individuals and families.

From contraception to reproductive technologies like in vitro fertilization to abortion, the explanations people make reproductive health care decisions are as diverse as people themselves. Politicians have shown that they’ve neither the knowledge nor the nuance to legislate for everyone on these issues. Sometimes during debates it becomes clear that they lack an understanding of basic biological functions. But even at their best, they can’t encompass the complete breadth or depth of the physiological, social, emotional, and spiritual intricacies of their constituents’ lives. If they simply left medical decisions to patients and their doctors, we might have a more just and moral nation.

In a country where the maternal mortality rate is higher than in most developed countries, a problem much more pronounced for black women, the black community and the black church have a responsibility to advocate for women’s rights to make their very own medical decisions. In the wake of this decision, researchers note that communities already affected by poverty and inadequate health care can even suffer disproportionate harm in the shape of pregnancy complications and maternal deaths. Simply put, more black women will die from…

SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA – JANUARY 29: U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris speaks with actress Sophia Bush throughout the Fight for Reproductive Freedoms event at Mexican Heritage Plaza on January 29, 2024 in San Jose, California. Vice President Harris travels the country to boost awareness of reproductive rights. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Pregnancy, as a biological process leading to human reproduction, all the time requires physical sacrifice and carries the potential of death. So many various things can go mistaken, greater than may be listed in a single short essay. But let me mention just a few that I actually have observed during my pastoral ministry.

Consider a 30-yr-old woman who was in good health before becoming pregnant but who developed hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). Some people describe HG euphemistically as extreme morning sickness, but that description doesn’t begin to inform the story of what happens to women that suffer from it or the danger it poses. A young woman in my church couldn’t keep food or fluids down. During the primary trimester of her pregnancy, she was hospitalized five times and got here near death persistently. None of the treatments worked. Some decisions needed to be made.

Fortunately, my parishioner lives in a state where there are not any restrictions on abortion. She and her family were in a position to make a decision without the added burden of negotiations with the state. If she lived in Texas or one other state where abortion is restricted, she would have needed to cope with the physical and emotional trauma she experienced, in addition to the legal burden of convincing the state that she was close enough to death to be eligible for termination. She would must hire a lawyer if she needed a doctor.

In one other case, a young woman discovered she had a tumor when she was originally of her second trimester. Due to the sort of tumor her doctors suspected, treatment would require the injection of a chemical that will be fatal to the fetus. Although there was a possibility that her tumor was of a different type, she was encouraged to determine quickly what tests she wanted because if an abortion was mandatory, it needed to be done before the Pennsylvania deadline. In this case, state governments exerted pressure to finish the contract sooner when more information was needed.

Every pastor I do know has witnessed countless examples of human complexity in the realm of ​​reproduction. A minor who has been impregnated as a results of acts of violence and incest. An ectopic pregnancy that have to be terminated to save lots of life and fertility. An advanced pregnancy that has turned out to be infertile and requires an abortion to guard the mother from sepsis. Miscarriage requiring a D&C procedure to remove remaining fetal material. In states where abortion is restricted, the health care women and girls need is in danger. And a Trump-Vance administration would only make things worse.

The results of this decision was Trump’s first presidency. While Trump obfuscates and lies about his intentions in his second presidency, his collection of J.D. Vance tells the true story. Vance has pledged to make abortion illegal without exception, even to save lots of the mother’s life, whilst he cruelly mocks and ridicules women who do not need children. In turn, the Harris-Walz administration guarantees to revive medical decisions to their proper place, between patient and doctor.

As pastors and non secular leaders, we cannot fix what ails our congregations physically, but we will advocate for them politically in order that the load of the selections they make in complex and specific circumstances is just not increased by laws that limit their freedom of motion or that tie the hands of their doctors .

This article was originally published on : www.essence.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version