These DNC Leaders Define Beauty Their Own Way – Essence

In what seems like an infinite string of unprecedented times, the nation is preparing for one more high-stakes election season. The 2024 Democratic National Convention will provide a significant platform for the party’s presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, and, inevitably, for Black women in politics more broadly. This heightened level of visibility is sparking conversations about representation, free speech, and ultimately, beauty standards.

That said, convention committee executive director Christy George and senior advisor Keiana Barrett sit down with ESSENCE to define beauty in their very own words, discuss how beauty manifests within the political sphere, and detail what practices they deal with to feel empowered. Read on to learn more.

How do they define beauty?

For each professionals, the qualities that outline beauty are far-reaching. George’s multicultural, multi-regional background has exposed her to many interpretations of beauty and the standards that go along with them, shaping how she sees beauty in her own life. “It’s about how we treat people,” she says, “not necessarily the conventional way of looking at things, but for me, it’s an internal perspective.”

Barrett’s poetic response is consistent with George’s and focuses on the thought of ​​the inner self. She defines beauty as “the mosaic image of what the eye sees” [paired with] a mirrored image of 1’s inner being.” They acknowledge the impact that physical presentation, confidence, and body language have after they enter historically white spaces, they usually consider it much more necessary to define beauty for oneself. Barrett talks about how beauty can present itself in body language, posture, and the atmosphere through which one moves. These interpretations of beauty materialize within the political landscape through actions.

George sees beauty in uncompromising and authentic women. “The women in politics I like most are those that can [be] that, and likewise to offer space for others to indicate up as their authentic selves; the Michelle Obamas and Minyon Moores of this world.” She recalls the great thing about the ladies who got here before her, like former Commissioner Maria Guerra Lepacek, and her ability to balance political and private responsibilities as a working mother who also put plenty of effort into her own physical beauty.

Barrett believes that the more confident an individual is of their intellect and the talents they bring about to an area, the more confidence and ease they exude of their physical presence. “Once you have that level of conviction, it becomes a gateway and a liberating role for others who come after you,” she states.

Who is their beauty inspiration?

Barrett references historical figures like Shirley Chisolm, whose signature hairdo could be seen in campaign images for the 1968 congressional election. She shares the view that ladies like Chisolm devote as much attention to physical presentation as they do to defining their work and politics. In other words, there may be beauty of their duality.

In today’s climate, “it’s amazing to me how many women of color were free on Capitol Hill,” Barrett says, describing her initial response to the expansive hair, piercings and makeup on this political environment. “Of all the places where we shape policy and legislate, we recognize that free speech is an absolute necessity.” That remark “allowed me to bring out the best in myself.”

How Politics Influences Beauty Choices

George attributes a few of today’s freedom of expression to principles equivalent to The Crown Act. The need for the policy, Barrett says, arose from “the notion that conformity is a requirement for participation and acceptance,” a notion they vehemently reveal to be fallacious. Since the policies were introduced, George has noticed a shift in attitudes and practices amongst black people regarding their hair. “In my family, hair is definitely an expression of who we are, but it’s also a source of creativity,” he explains. For each women, expression and creativity are non-negotiable elements that contribute to their personal beauty and presence.

They channel that sentiment into generating a way of empowerment through their very own beauty habits. George opens up about her personal beauty practice, which involves wearing a set of bijou from the ladies in her life. She explains, “I always like to have one woman from my family with me every day.” In this manner, she brings the great thing about these women together with her to support her in these environments.

What are their current self-care practices?

Barrett focuses on mental health to be sure that inner beauty is reflected on the surface. She relies on yoga and breathwork to ground her sense of belonging. Paired together with her love of individuality, she steps into the role of political advisor, feeling centered and proudly adorning her eclectic accessories and ever-changing hairstyles. She does this for herself, but in addition to be sure that one concept of relative beauty mustn’t force others to standardize on “the norm.”

On the present state of beauty and politics

While there are lots of varieties of beauty, women in politics still face many limitations that distract from progress. George discusses the double standards when it comes to male counterparts, texture, and featurism applied to Black women, and the way these -isms are also exacerbated amongst various kinds of Black women. This disproportionate criticism of certain women was the experience of former First Lady Michelle Obama, who faced infinite public ridicule for her appearance and wonder selections.

For a lot of these reasons, it looks as if a phenomenon that VP Harris is getting such positive feedback on her silk press. For Barrett, this shift in public perception feels “triumphant. It gives me hope that as a society, we are broadening our perspective, that we are preserving what is most important, what is most important.” For George, “it feels like a surreal moment.” Especially for the reason that chairwoman (Minyon Moore), the manager director and the senior adviser to the DNC Economic Committee are all black women.

While beauty can and needs to be limitless, Barrett believes that “it gives space for our political leaders of color to cast a wider net and make sure that the way they enter a room is striking, not only because of their physical presence, but also because of their history of building community.”

“Some politicians will use appearance to distract from the issues. I wish that wasn’t where we were spending our time. That aspect of beauty doesn’t have to be in the conversation. There’s nothing beautiful about it,” George firmly states. Instead, political discussions about beauty should end in more protective policies that allow people to present themselves nonetheless they feel comfortable without making it the focus.

It’s clear that for each women, beauty is within the demeanor. The DNC Committee leaders are able to tackle the conference with conviction, competence, and wonder.