Trump’s war on diversity, justice and integration: understanding the impact of his latest executive orders – essence

Since the office was taken about three weeks ago, Donald Trump has issued a blot of over 200 executive orders. Among them are two key directives against diversity, justice and inclusion (DEI), which threatens to withdraw a long time of progress in expanding the possibilities for colourful people, women and other historically marginalized groups.

. The first executive ordinance It eliminates, adopted by Dei as part of President Biden, who required from all federal agencies to create plans to “solve uneven barriers for possibilities” and ensure justice in the workplace. Trump’s order ends all Dei, Deia (diversity, justice, inclusion and availability) and environmental justice tasks, in addition to all programs, subsidies or contracts related to its implementation, calling them “forced illegal and immoral discrimination programs.”

. Second executive order It eliminates all DEI orders from previous administrations, including one of President Lyndon Johnson from 1965, who required federal contractors to make sure equal opportunities. With back withdrawal, Trump called Dei “immoral” and “illegal” and painted it as “corrosive, and fatal based on identity The corruption system “, which robbed” hard -working Americans ” – to some extent white men -” possibilities because of their race or sex “.

President Trump also warned about “negative consequences” For those federal employees who don’t report back to colleagues who refuse to dismantle Dei policy.

While the order is restricted to the federal government, he directs federal agencies to seek out ways, including a possible court dispute, to exert pressure on the private sector to desert his Dei policy. This threatens that it can speed up the corporate anti-dei trend that was already lively. Walmart, who announced an investment in the amount of $ 100 million in the center of racial capital in 2020, announced just a few days after the election of Trump that he would drop the center and wouldn’t use Dei and Latinx conditions in official communication. McDonald’s, Meta and Target also abandoned their initiatives Dei As reported by Axios.

After the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2023, which recognized the affirmative motion in university parties as unconstitutional, the attacks on Dei spread and the term became a right -wing Bogeyman for nearly every little thing that goes flawed in every workplace. For example, only a day after a tragic plane and a collision of a helicopter on the Potomac River, which won 67 lives, Trump blamed unjustly DEI rules regarding the disaster – while the investigation into the accident barely began. The language in the ordinance of President Trump also presents Dei’s policy as a dangerous nature, declaring that “they threaten the safety of American men, women and children across the country by reducing the importance of individual merits, skills, hard work and determination when choosing people for work and services in key sectors of American society.”

It seems that these statements suggest that Dei exists in opposition to perfection and exertions-that ensuring possibilities of non-white people robotically reduces standards. It’s false. Dei requires the same standards for everybody and only employs those that meet the requirements of a given jobpoint repeated Everett Kelly, domestic president Of the 800,000 members of the American Federation of Governmental Workers, “the Federal Government already employs and promotes only on the basis of merits. The results are clear: a diverse federal workforce, which looks like a nation with which it serves, with the lowest gender and racial differences in the country. We should all be proud of it. “

Blacks are a bigger share in the federal labor force (18.6%) than in the case of civil labor (12.8%),According to Pew Research. It shouldn’t be clear how many individuals will affect the order. Despite this, the federal government is the largest employer in the USA and black individuals who They have the highest As a result, unemployment rates, risk of greater loss of work.

The ambiguity of the orders of President Trump meant that agencies were fighting to follow and erase the black history. For example, the air force recently removed the aviators Tuskegee From their training movies, and this was restored only after public outrage.

The anti-dei trend is an element of a bigger attack on anti-discrimination efforts, attributable to the pursuit of racial progress after George Floyd’s murder in 2020. Now that Dei is under fire, the query is-how will we keep these policies alive?

Despite the growing political pressure of an organization corresponding to Apple, Costco and JPmorgan Chase RUnwavering emain In their involvement in diversity, justice and inclusion, refusing to bow to conservative attacks. In addition, most corporations from the Fortune 500 list didn’t abandon their DEI rules.

. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), an impartial group that fights with “government abuse” primarily through lawsuits, prevents President Trump’s claim that Dei or Deia are illegal, saying: “Execution orders are trying to combine these lawful efforts with discrimination, enforcing weapons to intimidate institutions to abandon critical programs.” “However, no court stated that Deia’s efforts illegal by nature, and President Trump could not replace the decades of legal precedent.” ACLU supported and introduced quite a few lawsuits against the withdrawal of Dei during the first term of Trump and I swear I did it.

In the meantime, the Act on Civic Rights continues to be the right of land and discriminating everyone based on a race, sex and other protected features stays illegal.