The Federal Court of Appeal maintains the conviction of the singer R. Kelly and the 30-year prison term

R. Kelly’s tribute and beliefs about sexual trade with 30 years old Prison sentenceHe was kept on Wednesday by a federal court of appeal, who stated that the singer had been using her fame for over 1 / 4 of a century to ladies and young women with sexual abuse.

The second American Court of Appeal in Manhattan ruled on Wednesday after hearing the arguments in March last 12 months.

In 2021, in 2021 at the Brooklyn Federal Court at the Brooklyn Federal Court at the Brooklyn Federal Court, Brooklyn Federal Court, Brooklyn Federal Court at the Brooklyn Federal Court, he was awarded.

Advocate Jennifer Bonjean, representing R. Kelly, said in a press release that she believes that the Supreme Court would agree to contemplate the appeal. According to the second, she called the “unprecedented” circuit, saying that it gave prosecutors unlimited freedom of recognition, to use the law of verats “to absurdly distant situations” from the intention of the statute.

Last 12 months The Supreme Court rejected hear an appeal against a 20-year sentence received by Kelly after he was convicted In 2022, a baby sexual allegations, including allegations of creating images of sexual abuse of children in Chicago.

Kelly’s second circuit rejected that the evidence of the trial was inappropriate, the constitutionality of some state provisions used against him was doubtful, 4 sworn were biased, the trial judge issued some incorrect judgments, and the fee for tribute more often utilized in cases of organized crime was incorrect.

“It enables the constellation of managers, assistants and other employees for over twenty -five years, Kelly used her fame to lure girls and young women,” said the Court of Appeal, noticing that his members of his dawn helped him introduce him to juvenile girls.

“The evidence at the trial showed that he would be insolvenated from friends and family, controlled almost every aspect of their lives and abused them orally, physically and sexually,” said a 3 -person panel.

The Court of Appeal stated that “neither arbitrary nor irrational”, that several prosecutors could testify at the hearing, that Kelly gave them herpes without disclosure that he had sexually transmitted disease, and was not overly harmful or collected that seven witnesses, who weren’t adults yet, when Kelly began to abuse them, she could testify.

“No testimonies were more inflammatory than the accused’s amendments,” said the Court of Appeal.

The second circuit also stated that the trial judge is just not unfairly harmful to permit jurors to observe graphic movies. The movies, as the Court of Appeal said: “They were properly awarded to show the company’s funds and methods, including the level of control and domination of Kelly over their victims.”

Bonjean, in her statement on behalf of R. Kelly, also quoted a partial objection by which one referee of the 2nd District, Richard J. Sullivan, agreed with what he described as “an excellent opinion”, but he partly didn’t realize himself One victim of the supply of suppressive herpes drug system for the restitution prize awarded. The award was based on the costs of a branded drug when a generic is accessible.

“It was not a restitution. It was the government’s effort to unfairly enrich government witnesses with their testimony – said Bonjean.

Kelly, born Robert Sylvester Kelly, is thought from work, including the hit “I Believe and Can Fly” and the iconic classic “Tapped in the Closet”, a multi -part tale of sexual betrayal and intrigue.

Kelly sold thousands and thousands of albums and remained wanted even after the allegations of the abuse of young girls It began to flow into in the 90s publicly.. In 2008 he was acquitted as a result of the sexual abuse of children in Chicago, but Second trial in Chicago In 2022, he ended with a conviction on the charge of creating photos of kid’s sexual abuse and tempting girls for sex.

Kelly’s universal sexual indignation didn’t appear Document “Surviving R. Kelly”.