Politics and Current
Elon Musk throws an attack of anger over court supervision because critics demand that he move to a country where presidents have unlimited power
Elon Musk blows up the judiciary, claims that if judges can stop executive: “We don’t live in democracy.”
“If any judge can stop any presidential action anywhere anywhere, we don’t live in democracy,” Musk wroTme Thursday on its social media platform X.
The technology billionaire is frustrated court rulings This was blocked by the efforts of the Government Department so as to gain access to data from work and education departments, including challenges towards the agency’s body.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b8e7/7b8e73b0eead8575753042502df1b22b06efe5e1" alt=""
When readers resembled the poorly informed Doge head, the things themselves complain that they’d make us democracy.
“Huh? What is the meaning of having a court ward if they can’t rule, what is legal and what is not? ” wrote One critic. “This is their function. This is called checks and balances. Why do you want to destroy our standards? If you are not satisfied with the decision, the Court of Appeal is to Scotus. “
These are quite staple items, but Musk bypasses the law since Doge unintentionally began casting government agencies while thinning the federal government’s workforce.
Accepting some “mistakes” in an oval office press conference Earlier this week, Musk defended Doge efforts, calling cuts “common sense” and “not draconian or radical”.
“People voted for a serious reform of the government and this is what people will get,” he said. “This is what democracy is all about.”
Musk described the workforce as a “unreasonated” fourth branch that had “more power than any chosen representative.”
But what concerning the unprecedented power of a given Musk, whose reflection on democracy differ significantly from the creators of the structure, especially when it comes to court supervision?
“It’s literally the essence of democracy” wrote One commentator. “Our government has three equal branches, and the court may and must be a control of the executive department when it violates the law, especially a direct violation of the constitution.”
Meanwhile, President Donald Trump tried to limit independent supervision, releasing the final inspector of the American International Development Agency because the day after the guard’s warning that it was almost not possible to monitor humanitarian funds price $ 8.2 billion after Doge began to disassemble the agency.
At this point, Musk seems responsible only to the president, who handed his most eminent campaign donor to the overwhelming mandate to adapt the federal government to his program, after a project project within the 2025 project, which is aimed toward transforming federal agencies by limiting regulatory supervision mechanisms and restructuring financing .
While Musk’s methods are disturbing for some, the final word goal stays popular amongst many supporters of Trump who accept interference with satisfaction.
“The federal government is so great that there are certainly significant possibilities of saving and performance,” says Robert Doar, president of the American Enterprise Institute, Think Tank Center. “The fact that the president and his team devote a lot of attention to is a good thing.”
And Musk has not shown a tendency to decelerate the method. Musk acted in the identical way when he took over Twitter two years ago, shooting 80 percent of his staff and leading to chaotic and protracted results, as described within the book “Character Limit”.
The similarities to its bureaucratic decomposition are difficult to ignore. On January 28, thousands and thousands of officials in the complete government received the e -mail message offering them eight months in exchange for resignation, in addition to the contract offered to Twitter employees. Posted E -Mile even used the identical topic: “Fork on the road”.
Of course, Twitter is a private company managed by its own set of rules. Musk recognized the structure way more difficult to navigate.
One user x suggested The owner of Tesla and Space X “go to the actual dictatorship and will buy this leader. Much more fun, better trolling options and can even let Musk press the button for Lolz. “