Technology
As YC withdraws from Africa, graduates are launching accelerators to fill the gap
Influential accelerator Y Combinator made waves in Africa in 2020 when it make clear the market and started welcoming startups from the region into its cohorts. The move was huge: on this nascent market, startups especially depend on such programs to find their feet and connect with investors, and YC is the platinum standard on this process.
Fast forward to today, nevertheless, and that spotlight has began to look a bit fickle. Currently, YC is following suit big problems in areas reminiscent of manufacturing, defense and climate, and has quietly reduced its concentrate on developing markets. However, in Africa, some people use it as a possibility. To fill this gap, local accelerators are emerging – powered by none apart from African YC graduates.
The latest wave of accelerators is coming at the same time that the model favored by older local startup accelerators is changing. The co-creation of HUB (CcHub), Flat6Labs, Baobab Network and MEST Africa has seeded corporations with global accelerators for years, providing a startup pipeline for larger investors, including foreign ones, during the enterprise boom. Now, as foreign investors withdraw, local players are being forced to rethink how to acquire and develop startups on the continent.
“In my opinion, instead of attacking US companies (who don’t care about Africa anyway and are just being opportunistic), the community needs to come together to programmatically fund the sub-$1 million pipeline, much like Techstars, YC and 500 Startups have done over the years all the years,” wrote Iyinoluwa Aboyeji, co-founder of YC-backed Flutterwave, in Recently on LinkedIn.
Speed up Africalaunched by Aboyeji, is one such initiative. Already having 20 startups in its portfolio, the year-old accelerator spun off from enterprise capital firm Aboyeji’s internal Future Africa program (where fellow Accelerate Africa co-founder, Mia von Koschitzky-Kimanican be a partner).
Aboyeji’s ambition is to turn into the “YC of Africa” - simply described, if not simply executed.
Indeed, African start-ups are currently at a crossroads. Successful African founders who’ve passed through the YC process have little question about the value of being chosen for programs with a global focus.
“Anyone who knows me has heard me say, ‘Africa’s YC is YC,’” Aboyeji, who can be the founding father of SoftBank-backed Andela, told TechCrunch in a recent interview with TechCrunch. “This is my most typical response when someone mentions joining an accelerator. I all the time tell them: “YC is standard and let me help you prepare an offer so you can apply there.”
However, the truth is that no African startup made it to the latest summer edition of Y Combinator; and in the three previous batches, there have been only three start-ups from the continent. Let’s compare this with previous years, when the Summer 2021 group included 10 African startups, Winter 2022 – 23, and Summer 2022 – 8 (and in completely distant years related to Covid-19 there have been much more).
YC’s change in attitude just isn’t simply because what it’s searching for has modified: since 2022, it has also reduced the size of its post-pandemic cohorts (when at its peak the variety of startups was 400 in a single batch) and returned to -person, with international founders, in turn, are more susceptible to stricter U.S. visa policies. Startups in Latin America and India also saw large declines in adoption.
“YC has and will continue to fund startups and founders from all over the world, including Africa. During COVID parties, we funded global companies via Zoom,” a YC spokesperson told TechCrunch. “Today we are requiring all YC startups to move to San Francisco, which has naturally changed the mix of startups applying to YC. We are still interested in talking to and accepting applications from the best startups from around the world.”
Prioritizing local capital, partners and public markets
According to the study, foreign financing, which incorporates enterprise capital funds and development finance institutions, has typically accounted for about 77% of all enterprise capital financing in Africa over the past decade. African Private Capital Associationdue to this fact, the decline in interest abroad had a direct impact on the amounts invested in Africa. It found that in the first half of 2024, the overall value of investment in startups dropped by a surprising 65% compared to the previous 12 months.
“It starts with a pipeline of exceptional early-stage startups that the ecosystem and larger companies have access to, and then scales it up. I can say this with certainty because I saw it happen when YC was built,” Aboyeji said, referring to his experience watching Erik Migicovsky, friend and founding father of Beeper and Peeble, take part in the accelerator’s early days. “I watched (YC) build, grow and become what it is today. And I think we can do it here.”
Some corporate VC firms reminiscent of Orange Ventures – affiliated with the French telecommunications company – exist, but local corporations haven’t yet collectively embraced this enterprise asset class.
Accelerate Africa goals to create partnerships between portfolio corporations and native banks, telecommunications corporations and others, not only through direct capital investments, but in addition through mentoring, resources and services. The company’s goal is to achieve revenues of USD 1 million for its portfolio corporations.
“We work closely with these corporations to create exit paths and help our companies solve problems specific to their markets, rather than copying Silicon Valley’s financing model,” Aboyeji said.
There are large Africa-focused funds reminiscent of Partech Africa, Norrsken22, Algebra Ventures and Al Mada. Collectively, they’ve raised almost $1 billion in investment on the continent, but haven’t yet been widely implemented. Building stronger early-stage corporations will put more of them at the table with greater investors.
There continues to be the matter of exits. Listings of technology corporations in local African markets remain rare, with only two startups – Flutterwave and Interswitch – currently choosing an IPO.
There can be artificial intelligence in Africa.
Apart from investor appetite, startups in Africa face one other problem: they are out of fashion.
Generative AI is the hottest trend in technology today, but Africa and other emerging markets have to this point lagged behind their Western counterparts in North America and Europe when it comes to creating AI-based startups. Significantly, greater than half of the 92 African corporations that passed through YC focused on fintech – YC’s most vital sector before the AI boom.
Only one in all Accelerate Africa’s portfolio corporations, CDIAL.AI, creates conversational AI that fluently understands and speaks African languages. Startup represents one in all the few ventures from the continent and underrepresented communities to join the global discourse around generative AI.
There is now an accelerator in Nigeria that goals to reverse this trend.
GoTime AIbased in Lagos, is aimed toward founders developing AI products in Africa. Using Nigeria as a place to begin, it has five startups in its cohort.
GoTime AI is an idea Agbol’s defenderfellow co-founder and CEO of Flutterwave, through his enterprise capital firm and early-stage studio Resilience17 (R17).
“Artificial intelligence is the most influential global megatrend to emerge in the last 20 years since mobile devices.” Hasan’s voicegeneral partner at R17, he told TechCrunch in an interview. “It’s still early, so we want to speed up work on this engine. This is not a copy-paste from YC, but it is simply an acknowledgment that it is not only Silicon Valley that is excited about artificial intelligence.”
This highlights an interesting change. In the past, leading startups in emerging markets have managed to clone and adapt Silicon Valley models to regional needs in sectors reminiscent of fintech, logistics and health technology. On the other hand, artificial intelligence is undeniably a world game, similar to SaaS – a challenge, but in addition a possibility.
Luongo, who leads GoTime AI’s operations, believes Africa has a possibility to construct AI products at lower costs than in Western markets, which could make AI startups here more attractive to buyers, especially as they command lower valuations.
“We assume they will work. We are betting that the talent level here will be comparable to or even better than talent in other countries, while at the same time we will benefit from lower operating costs,” Luongo argued. “Also, companies here probably won’t have high valuations, so global companies could probably buy them at a lower price but still get great talent and their products.”
Pipeline repair: inspection or no inspection?
Unlike Accelerate Africa, GoTime AI doesn’t aim to be the next YC on the continent. Instead, the accelerator becomes a springboard for AI startups to empower them to access opportunities offered by early-stage investors.
The accelerator plans to expand its program across Africa and accept 15 to 20 startups per cohort, depending on the success of its inaugural cohort in Nigeria.
AI applications for legal, compliance and sales/customer relationship management – trends also seen in recent batches of YC – are present in the GoTime AI and Accelerate Africa portfolios. Both accelerators start with two cohorts per 12 months, although their deal structures differ significantly.
GoTime AI invests up to $200,000 in exchange for 8% equity, which is structured at $25,000 upfront, $75,000 at the demo day and $100,000 during the startup’s first fundraising. The accelerator also offers its startups mentorship, workspaces, and access to APIs and cloud credits to train AI models and test products.
Accelerate Africa, which currently operates on a grant of lower than $1 million, doesn’t provide upfront funding or take capital upon adoption.
“The usefulness of these first two cohorts is storytelling, halo effect, community, not money. As soon as we get the money, we will probably change the model,” he said Black Eraserenterprise partner at Accelerate Africa, to TechCrunch regarding the accelerator’s decision not to provide funding to its startups. Instead, its sister fund Future Africa can co-invest between $250,000 and $500,000 after the program ends as a part of the standard investment process.
Although Accelerate Africa doesn’t offer upfront funding, it has an acceptance rate of 1.4% and claims to have helped first cohort startups raise over $5 million. “We have a quality bar; we don’t want to build an accelerator that is no better than YC in Africa,” Udezue noted.
Technology
23andme customers informed about bankruptcy and potential claims – the deadline is July 14
23andme, an infinite of genetic tests, which has been priced on billions, is now moving in bankruptcy in chapter 11 and will notify an incredible deal of and an incredible deal of of current and former clients that they is perhaps entitled to make claims as a component of the restructuring process. The company and 11 of its subsidiaries, including Lemonaid Health and LPRXONE, submitted an application for bankruptcy protection on March 23 this yr in the eastern Missouri district. Customers were notified on Sunday to July 14 of July 14 about claims for losses.
Bankruptcy occurs after a storm of 18 months for 23ndme, marked with a decrease in sales, managerial departures and destructive violation of information, which violated confidential personal data of virtually 7 million users. Violation, publicly disclosed October 2023According to TechCrunch, names, birth years, relationship labels, DNA percentage, participation with relatives, ancestors’ reports and locations. Fallout caused many collective processes and a wave of distrust of customers, which seriously cuts the company coping with the company’s consumers.
Now customers that affected this violation – particularly imposed by 23andme that their information has been violated between May and October 2023 – they’ll submit so -called Civil security incident claim. Those who’ve suffered financial damage or others on account of the violation may make a claim inside the bankruptcy case. Customers with other varieties of complaints not related to cyber attack, paying homage to problems with the results of a DNA test or a teeth service in the company, can submit a separate claim in accordance with General bar date package.
Congress also expressed concerns about the consequences of bankruptcy privacy.
The fall of 23andme was fast by grace, and his misfortunes were intensified by her ambitious but expensive extension in digital health and telemedicine, including $ 400 million The takeover of Lemonaid Health in 2021 was originally aimed toward diversifying 23andme offers, apart from testing consumer DNA, movements tensed 23andme financial resources and didn’t provide the growth needed by the company.
Proposed settlement in the amount of $ 30 million in a related collective lawsuit over a cyber attack stays Due to bankruptcy proceedings. (23andme lawyers claim that the settlement is now disputed when the company is in bankrupt.) Customers who must handle up the right to compensation must provide formal evidence of the claim regardless of their participation in a collective motion.
TechCrunch contacted 23andme to comment.
TechCrunch event
Berkeley, California
|.
June 5
Book now
Technology
The time of the American semiconductor market in 2025.
It was already a turbulent yr for the American semiconductor industry.
The semiconductor industry plays a major role in the “AI race”, which the US appears to be determined, so it’s value being attentive to this: from the appointment of Lip-Bu Tan-which has not waste time to work, attempting to revitalize the Heritage Company-Joe Biden proposing latest rules of exports AI AI along the way that would not or can follow.
Here’s what happened since the starting of the yr.
Power
Last reversal
May 7: Just every week before the “Frame of Artificial Intelligence Diffusion”. According to many media, including Axios AND BloombergThe administration won’t implement restrictions when it was to start out on May 15 and as a substitute works in its own framework.
April
Anthropic doubles the support of chip export restrictions
April 30: Anthropic has doubled because of the limitation of exports of chip systems in the USA, including several corrections to artificial intelligence framework, akin to imposing further restrictions in level 2 and dedication of resources to enforcement. The NVIDIA spokesman rejected, saying: “American companies should focus on innovations and get up to the challenge, instead of telling high stories that large, heavy and sensitive electronics are somehow smuggled in” Baby bugghs “or” next to the lobsters live “.
Planned exemptions at Intel
April 22: Before connecting profits with Q1, Intel said he was planning to release over 21,000 employees. The exemptions were to enhance management, something that the general director of Lip-Bu Tan has long said that Intel must do and help in the reconstruction of the company’s engineering.
The Trump administration further limits the chip export
April 15: The NVIDIA H20 AI chip was hit with the requirement of export license, the company revealed in the SEC application. The company added that it expects for $ 5.5 billion fees related to this latest requirement in the first quarter of the tax yr in 2026. H20 is the most advanced AI Nvidia chip can still export to China in some form or fashion. TSMC and Intel reported similar expenses in the same week.
TechCrunch event
Berkeley, California
|.
June 5
Book now
NVIDIA seems to talk of further export of chips
April 9: According to reports, the general director of Nvidia, Jensen Huang, was noticed for dinner at the Mar-A-Lago Center in Donald Trump. Then, NPR was reported Huang could have the ability to save lots of AI H20 NVIDIA systems from export restrictions after investing in AI data centers in the USA
Alleged agreement between Intel and TSMC
April 3: Intel and TSMC allegedly reached a preliminary agreement on the commencement of a joint project of Chips. This joint undertaking would work in Intel devices, and TSMC would have 20% shares in the latest undertaking. Both firms refused to comment or confirm. If this contract just isn’t accomplished, this might be a good preview of potential offers in this industry.
Intel rotates from non -corporate assets, proclaims a brand new initiative
April 1: CEO Lip-BU TAN immediately worked. Just just a few weeks after joining the Intel, the company announced that it might rotate resources unrelated to the core in order that it could focus. He also said that the company would introduce latest products, including non -standard semiconductors for purchasers.
March
Intel calls the latest CEO
March 12: Intel announced that a veteran of the industry and a former board member, Lip-Bu Tan will return to the company as general director on March 18. At the time of his appointment, Tan said that Intel could be a “engine -oriented company” under his leadership.
February
Intel’s Ohio Chip Plant is delayed again
February 28: This yr, Intel was to start out running its first chip factory in Ohio. Instead, the company slowed down the construction of the plant for the second time in February. Now the design of semiconductors value $ 28 billion won’t end with the construction until 2030 and might even open only in 2031.
Senators call for more chip export restrictions
February 3: US Senators, including Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), wrote a letter to the Secretary for Trade for Howard Lutnicka Calling Trump’s administration for further restriction Export of the AI system. A letter addressed especially to AI H20 NVIDIA systems, which were used during training of the R1 Deepseek “reasoning” model.
January
Deepseek releases its open model “reasoning”
January 27: The Chinese startup Ai Deepseek caused quite mixing in the Silicon Valley when he released the open version of his model “reasoning” R1. Although this just isn’t a special message of semiconductors, the alarm in the AI industry and Deepseek semiconductors meant that it still has an impact on the chip industry.
Order Joe Biden on the export of chip
January 13: Only the incumbent week remained, former President Joe Biden proposed extensive export restrictions on AI systems made by the USA. The order has created a 3 -level structure that determined what number of American systems will be exported to every country. According to this proposal, level 1 countries didn’t face any restrictions; Countries 2 level 2 had a chip purchase limit for the first time; And level 3 countries received additional restrictions.
Dario Amodei from anthropics weighs the limitations of chip exports
January 6: Co -founder of anthropics and general director, Dario Amodei, co -author of opinions The Wall Street Journal Supporting existing control controls of the AI system and indicating them as the reason why the Chinese market of artificial intelligence was in the US. “He also called on the incoming President Donald Trump to impose further restrictions and shutting the gaps that allowed AI to get these tokens in China.
(Tagstranslate) Intel
Technology
One of the long -term VC Elona Muska suits his former employer after alleged dismissal
Josh Raffaella, who has deep roots as an investor of the Silicon Valley and was supported by many firms Elon Musk, suits his former employer, massive trillion dollars Aum Brookfield Asset Management, reports the New York Times.
A major part of Raffaella’s criticism concerns how Brookfield covered losses related to the pandemic of real estate and claims that the company released him after submitting the criticism of informants at SEC. His lawsuit gives allegations akin to fraud and bribe, while Brookfield deny all offenses rapidly, said The Times.
In February, Brookfield quietly closed the Venture Capital unit run by Raffaella and threw some assets on one other unit, Bloomberg reported at the moment. One of Raffaella’s complaints in the lawsuit is that Brookfield didn’t buy so many shares in firms belonging to musk because he provided the possibility of purchase.
Raffaella had shopping transactions in Musk, akin to SpaceX, XAI and a boring company, claims the claim. Bloomberg announced that his Brookfield fund was an awesome supporter of Twitter’s takeover by Musk.
The lawsuit is a really public battle of Raffaella, who previously worked as a partner at VC, known at the time as a drapeer Fisher Jurvetson. (Today it’s a set of funds.) In DFJ Brookfield, it has helped this company spend money on Musk, akin to Solarcity (acquired by Tesla), Spacex and Tesla.
(Tagstranslate) Brookfield