Fans are apprehensive that Michael Jordan just put a goal on his back.

23XI Racing, the auto racing team co-owned by the NBA legend, was certainly one of two teams that recently filed a federal lawsuit against NASCAR CEO Jim France.

On Wednesday, October 2, Jordan’s team and Front Row Motorsports filed a federal antitrust lawsuit in Charlotte, accusing the stock automobile racing authority of “monopolistic bullies that engage in anticompetitive practices.” The Associated Press reports that 23XI Racing and Front Row said of their lawsuit that “NASCAR’s new charter system limits competition by unfairly tying teams to the series, tracks and vendors.”

The teams said this “unlawful monopolization” didn’t merely lead to “enrichment” on the expense of the teams and their drivers, according to a replica of the lawsuit obtained by the AP. Both teams claim that these allegations violated Sections 1 and a pair of of the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890). How Illustrated sports cited in Article 1 of the Antitrust Act. “Every contract, trust or other arrangement, or conspiracy to restrain trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared illegal.”

September 7, 23XI Racing confirmed that they didn’t sign a take-it-or-leave-it NASCAR charter agreement because they “did not have the opportunity to fairly negotiate a new charter agreement.”

Statement further“We notified NASCAR in writing what issues needed to be addressed by the deadline. We are occupied with engaging in constructive discussions with NASCAR to address these issues and move forward in a way that leads to a good resolution while strengthening the game all of us love.

They ended the statement by reaffirming their commitment to the game, but alluding to questioning NASCAR’s practices. “At 23XI Racing, we remain committed to the highest level of competition while remaining steadfast in our belief that NASCAR should be governed by fair and equitable practices.”

He and Jordan co-own 23XI Racing with skilled NASCAR driver Denny Hamlin and sports agent/executive Curtis Polk. Bob Jenkins is the only real owner of Front Row Motorsports.

The lawsuit says the inequities stem from the France family and its longtime owner of NASCAR.

“Unlike many major professional sports leagues, such as the NFL and NBA, which are owned and operated by their teams, NASCAR has always been privately owned by the France family,” the lawsuit says.

In the documents, Polk, who also acts as Jordan’s sports agent, stated that “racing teams receive only about 13% of NASCAR’s steadily growing revenues, which include television deals signed since 2001 worth about $23.1 billion.”

ESPN reports that Jenkins revealed that he has never made a profit since founding his Front Row racing team in 2005. The outlet added that even after its driver Michael McDowell won the 2021 Daytona 500, Front Row didn’t break even for the season.

23XI Racing and Front Row released an album joint statement “expressing their passion for racing,” they hope the antitrust case will “benefit teams, drivers, sponsors and, most importantly, fans.”

Jenkins’ statement said that after 20 years in racing, it was time for a change. “We need a more competitive and fair system where teams, drivers and sponsors can be rewarded for our collective investments by building long-term enterprise value, just like any other successful professional sports league.”

“Everyone knows I have always been a fierce competitor and that will to win drives me and the entire 23XI team every week on the track,” Jordan said, referring to the suit. “I like racing and the fervour of our fans, but today’s NASCAR is unfair to the teams, drivers, sponsors and fans. Today’s motion shows that I’m ready to fight for a competitive market where everyone wins.

After Source They shared the story of the lawsuit on Instagram, and their followers suggested that increased security across the six-time NBA champion is perhaps vital.

“Jordan you better watch out… you see what these boys did to Diddy,” one follower said.

This person was referring to some old Air Jordan dirt. “They are going to bring up his past gambling problems and explain why the NBA booked him and made him retire.”

Another added instructions on why fans should display Jordan.

“Protect MJ. They will try to finish him off 😒 This Man is simply too wealthy. He’ll take 1 / 4 of what MJ asks for and pay someone to get away from him. Be careful”

Others had a special opinion and didn’t see how Jordan’s suit had anything to do with Diddy or put the NBA legend at risk.

“Her(s) come the black men who try to pull another brother down with their nasty, vindictive, evil mind, crab in a barrel, always praying for the other black man to fall. This man is suing the company for “unfair practices,” and here are black people trying to make him the next Diddy. Why are so many of us Black people like this towards each other?” said one commentator.

Another person said Jordan and Diddy’s situation is totally different: “What does this have to do with Diddy? Completely different situations! Entirely! Stop making us look bad by not understanding what happened.

NBC News as well as that the plaintiffs retained Jeffrey Kessler to represent them within the case. Kessler has a protracted history of specializing in sports antitrust issues and representing unions and players.

At the time of publication, NASCAR had not provided a press release regarding the lawsuit.

According to reports from January 2024, Grammy winner Kanye West allegedly took steps to ban his wife Bianca Censori from social media.

However, alleged insiders consider it was just one other control tactic the Chicago native used against her – just as he’s accused of dressing provocatively.

Reports that Kanye had banned her from social media first surfaced in January. A brand new report claims that the 29-year-old architectural designer’s family and friends have allegedly tried to talk to her concerning the situation, but their concerns seem to have fallen on deaf ears as they consider Kanye’s “controlled ways” over Bianca are too powerful. .

Ten months ago, the Daily Mail reported that an alleged tipster he said“Bianca at all times had and was lively on social media – until she married Kanye. He doesn’t want her to have it because he thinks it should hurt her if she has to read the terrible things people say.”

“He convinced her that since she was now a public figure, she should remain secretive,” the source said, adding that Bianca’s sudden withdrawal from social media gave the impression of one other control mechanism.

While Censori stays silent online, Kanye continues to post photos of her on his platforms, causing further concern in her inner circle. They see it as a way to “control her narrative” by showing her in fashionable styles that appear to re-introduce her image as a sex kitten to the world.

This will not be the primary time Kanye has been linked to controlling behavior, especially regarding the clothing of his partners.

His ex-wife, Kim Kardashian, publicly shared Kanye’s influence on her wardrobe during their marriage.

After Kanye’s public turn to religion, he insisted that Kardashian dress more modestly, but since his relationship with Censori, the tables have turned again. Censori’s recent looks have raised eyebrows for their daring, scantily clad style, leaving many wondering whether these fashion decisions are literally her own.

Despite the speculation, alleged sources close to the couple claim to the Daily Mail that Censori is just following Kanye’s rules.

One insider stated that he “wears what he wants, goes where he wants and does what he wants.” They then noticed the bizarre transition from her profession as a designer to simply being Kanye’s wife – an unpaid role in his life, the source said.

Concerns about Kanye’s controlling tendencies were also expressed by people from Censori’s closest circle.

Some have expressed concerns that her compliance could also be due to brainwashing, with one insider suggesting that she “no longer has a mind of her own.” This control allegedly extends beyond her social media use and wardrobe, including restrictions on public appearances and even dictating her food regimen and exercise routine.

An alleged close friend revealed that Kanye reportedly has a list of rules for Bianca, including guidelines on when to speak and what to eat, the Daily Mail wrote last yr.

What’s more, reports suggest that even Bianca’s risqué clothes will not be solely her alternative. Insiders consider her revealing outfits might be a part of Kanye’s vision for her public image and promote his brand as a fashion lover.

However, sources say that when it comes to dressing in front of Kanye’s children, she is anticipated to keep more secretive – it’s unclear whether that is due to the desires of Kanye or his ex-wife Kim Kardashian. The “SKIMS” owner reportedly expressed her disapproval of the way in which Censori dresses in front of her sons, noting that she prefers more modest outfits.

Interestingly, over the past few months, Kanye has been traveling around Asia to promote his latest album “Vultures 2”, and his wife’s fashion decisions have attracted attention in countries akin to South Korea, which has strict dress codes.

According to reports, the riskily dressed Censori took steps to hide out in regions with conservative standards, possibly to avoid legal consequences or imprisonment.

However, recent sightings of Kanye without Bianca in Tokyo have fueled rumors of trouble in paradise. She has not been seen in public with her husband since September 20.

Those close to her say Bianca is “disgusted” by certain facets of Kanye’s appearance – especially his latest titanium and platinum grill. The expert says his breath stinks and she or he doesn’t prefer it.

A supposed source close to her told In Touch Weekly: “She told her friends how discouraging she was. A detailed-up of her mouth – let alone her tongue – anywhere near his metal piercings makes her want to gag.

She doesn’t travel with him and leaks from her so-called friends are fueling rumors that their relationship is in trouble.

While individuals are brainwashing Censori, The Wall Street Journal did it reported that behind the scenes he does essential work related to Kanye’s business.

While selling one among his problematic properties, a Malibu house that had been the previous billionaire’s treasure trove for years, she reportedly “signed a whole series of sales agreements and contracts on his behalf.”

But since she still doesn’t have social media, a luxury supposedly forbidden by her husband, many individuals are unsure where she is and what she’s pondering, or whether she’s trapped under his influence.

Just when it seemed that Barack Obama would go down in history with none major personal scandals, a rumor emerged that called into query his loyalty to his wife of 32 years, Michelle Obama.

Recently, tabloids suggested that the former president was mesmerized by “Friends” star Jennifer Aniston, whose distinctive ’90s hairstyle has turn out to be a cultural phenomenon.

One headline even read, “The Truth About Jen and Barack,” claiming that Michelle felt “betrayed as Aniston steals her husband’s attention.”

Gossip articles claimed that Obama and Aniston were “mutually obsessed,” resulting in speculation that the Harvard alum can have wandered and lost interest in marrying the mother of his two daughters, Sasha and Malia.

When the Daily Mail reported about this rumor caused quite a stir amongst their supporters.

Some comments expressed disbelief, with one person writing: “It has often been suggested that separation or divorce would occur after the end of the Obama presidency. That didn’t happen.”

Another commenter laughed it off, calling it “the most unbelievable rumor I’ve ever read.” Too funny.

Another person sarcastically chimed in: “Saint Barack is having an affair? What’s next? Is he constructing a private fortune?

A more critical commentator compared Obama to Bill Clinton, who was impeached after being accused of sexual harassment by Paula Jones. Clinton initially denied having an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, however it later emerged that he had lied under oath about the relationship.

The comment read: “Clinton couldn’t focus on work because he was a horn dog. Obama’s motives are so sinister that the media makes up all varieties of things to humanize him.”

Despite the talk, Aniston herself stepped in to place the rumors to rest during a recent appearance on “Jimmy Kimmel Live.”

🚨: Jennifer Aniston responds to romance rumors with Barack Obama!

“I wasn’t mad about it, but it’s absolutely not true.” pic.twitter.com/CvKD15n9fk

— Storiman (@storiman_wcs) October 5, 2024

Laughing about the whole situation, she said, “I wasn’t mad about it,” but ultimately concluded that “it’s absolutely not true.”

Aniston explained: “Of all the calls you get out of your publicist, you are like, ‘Oh no, what’s it going to be?’ Or emails saying some trashy tabloid will make up a story – and that is it. I wasn’t indignant about it.” She went on to say, “I met him once. I do know Michelle higher than he does.

Although Obama largely avoided personal scandals, his political profession was not entirely free from controversy.

Donald Trump, who later became president after the Obama administration, was the source of considered one of the best political attacks on him – the birther theory. This false claim suggested that Obama was not born in the United States but in Kenya, which, as conspiracy theorists dubiously claimed, would disqualify him from the presidency. (Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas was born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father, and held Canadian citizenship until he renounced it in 2013. His eligibility was hardly questioned during the 2016 presidential campaign.)

Trump began publicly promoting the conspiracy in 2011, despite the fact that Obama’s birth certificate clearly showed he was born in Hawaii in 1961. Despite the evidence, the theory caught on with some people, and many critics argued it was racially motivated.

In 2016, Trump finally admitted that Obama was born in the US, but falsely claimed that Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign began the birth rumor – for which there is no such thing as a credible evidence.

Although Trump ultimately backed down from his claim, the racial damage had been done, and in some circles the theory continued.

This baseless narrative, like the Aniston scandal rumor, has been widely debunked and seen as a political attack with no factual basis.