Connect with us

Business and Finance

What’s Really Going On With Mielle Organics? Unpacking the Social Media Controversy

Published

on

Mielle Organics, a preferred Black-owned natural hair care company, recently found itself at the center of a heated social media controversy. What began as a publicized customer concern about their experiences with a few of the brand’s products has escalated right into a full-blown online backlash. Some users are claiming that Mielle Organics products cause hair loss and damage, which has sparked a broader conversation about hair look after Black women, the responsibility of beauty brands, and the integrity of the natural hair care industry.

The Beginnings of Controversy

Advertisement

Recently, increasingly women are reporting share your experiences using Mielle Organics hair care products. Sharing similar complaints of hair loss and damage, these personal stories quickly went viral on social media platforms, resulting in a wave of negative reactions online as other users took to the comments section to echo similar experiences, explaining that they thought they were “going crazy” after they noticed their hair falls out in clumpsWhile some say these negative results are simply user error, others consider the reason for these experiences is the products’ ingredients and the company’s move to mass production after partnering with personal care giant Procter & Gamble.

As a result, various rumors and claims have surfaced online about what is occurring with Mielle Organics. One of the biggest rumors is that Mielle Organics is facing a lawsuit. In addition to an unverified link posted on Redditthere aren’t any records of energetic lawsuits against the company producing natural hair care cosmetics.

Changes in the company

As theGrio previously reported, Mielle Organics is joining P&G Beauty, a division of Proctor & Gamble, in 2023. While Mielle Organics founder Monique Rodriguez described the partnership as a possibility to “further (expand) access to healthy hair care products and services for Black women around the world,” consumers had mixed reviews about the business milestone. At the time, many Black fans of the brand expressed concerns that Mielle Organics would fall into an all-too-familiar pattern of upper prices and different formulas consequently of the partnership.

Today, in light of reports of hair loss and damage, some users wonder if the brand’s collaboration with the cosmetics giant has not resulted in the creation of less secure formulas.

Advertisement

Founder’s Response

In response to the increasingly loud discussion about Mielle Organics products, Rodriguez released Instagram video statement. Sharing the brand’s history, the founder and CEO confirmed that Mielle Organics products are “made with wholesome ingredients and are formulated to deliver safe and effective results,” a lot in order that Rodriguez encouraged users to check the ingredient lists of products before the P&G acquisition and now.

“My entire family and I are passionate Mielle users… because we believe in the power of our products. So when I decided to partner with P&G, it was with a vision to take Mielle to new heights and become a global beauty brand. That vision is stronger than ever today,” she explained. “I am so grateful for the opportunities this partnership has brought us. This partnership has allowed us to expand our reach and make a positive impact on the world.”

Featured Stories

While she emphasized her ongoing commitment and dedication to serving the Mielle community, viewers noticed that the founder didn’t address the current controversy.

“You didn’t address the problem: people are losing their hair, so if the formula hasn’t changed, WHY are the results (changed)?” commented one user. “Check the cleanliness of the factory and collect batch numbers of the products people have. There is a problem and skimming over it is not the solution.”

Advertisement

Online Sections: Customers vs. Mielle Organics

As with many social media controversies, the discourse surrounding Mielle Organics quickly became polarized. On one side were customers who felt the brand had allow them to down, with some sharing personal stories of hair loss and accusing the company of prioritizing profit over their health. On the other side were defenders of the brand, lots of whom had positive experiences with Mielle Organics products and criticized the response as over the top. Proponents identified that hair loss may be attributable to plenty of aspects, including stress, hormonal changes, or improper use of the product, arguing that it was unfair accountable the company for all cases of hair damage.

In addition to Rodriguez’s video response, the hair care brand posted written statement directly addressing some recent claims, from product safety to rumors of lawsuits.

“We understand that recent questions about our brand and products have raised questions… It is important to note that none of the alleged negative experiences have been medically confirmed to be caused by our products,” the statement reads. “There have been false claims made on social media regarding the safety of our products. To clarify, no lawsuit has been filed against Mielle and we are not involved in any active litigation.”

In addition, the brand addressed the discussion on hair loss, citing American Dermatological AssociationStudies have shown that it’s normal to lose between 50 and 100 hairs a day. Noting that aspects corresponding to “hormonal changes, heredity, medications, stress, poor nutrition, and excessive styling can all contribute to increased hair loss,” the brand encouraged users experiencing these issues to hunt skilled help from a physician or certified dermatologist.

Advertisement

What Now? While the online controversy may proceed, the facts reveal three key takeaways:

  • There aren’t any energetic lawsuits pending against Mielle Organics.
  • The brand says the ingredients in its products haven’t modified since Force merged with P&G Beauty.
  • The reason for reports of hair loss and damage stays unconfirmed.


This article was originally published on : thegrio.com

Business and Finance

The economic policy conducted by Trump can influence small businesses

Published

on

By


Shaquana Teasley knows first hand in regards to the sting that the economic agenda imposed by the Trump administration can be provided.

Known as “Shaq”, Teasley is the founder and general director of Agate Solutions. Her company based in Atlanta makes a speciality of international trade and customs regulations within the USA. Teasley said Black company that her company experiences lower revenues and needed to dismiss employees since President Donald Trump closed the American International Development Agency (USAID), one among its largest clients.

As an independent federal agency and global humanitarian aid supplier, USAID managed Over $ 40 billion and supported about 130 countries.

Advertisement

“This is an unfortunate vision of USAID detention. However, due to our specialist knowledge in the recovery of tariffs, our company is still blooming because we help black companies increase profit margins. “

International Trade Expert, Teasley, identified that black firms should now try to make use of tariff optimization programs. He says that there are regulations that support the service of postponing engineering and production strategies that may gain advantage from black firms qualifying for such programs.

Teasley, who has over 20 years of experience within the industry, claims that she has conducted the initiatives of the world’s largest defense contractor with the intention to get well $ 30 million tariffs in the course of the Chinese trade war under the primary Trump administration.

Despite this, potential financial repercussions related to the activities of Trump and his regime look gloomy for small firms, including black entrepreneurs.

Advertisement

Fears of how small firms can develop and cope with other challenges which have recently appeared from three latest reports that reveal possible impact on these firms.

Fresh evaluation According to creative investment research, he estimates that the Department’s cancellation of 104 diversity, own capital and integration (DEI) and the next level of discrimination in generally estimates the annual lack of economic revenues at USD 1.6 trillion to $ 2.6 trillion dollars. .

William Michael Cunningham, economist and general director of Creative Investment Research, claims that estimating the lack of revenues significantly exceeds $ 1 billion “savings” Doge announced.

Doge is run by Elon Musk, a billionaire Trump designated to scale back federal expenses.

Advertisement

Cunningham claims that reduced government expenditure will increase social and economic costs in several areas, including employment, apartments, business loans and healthcare. For example, it was calculated that minority entrepreneurs may not have the opportunity to acquire future federal agreements and access to capital, limiting economic growth by $ 500 billion to $ 800 billion a yr.

“Departure from integration policies and economic programs reduces the domestic product or gross GDP, especially in a country as diverse as the United States of America.”

Dr Kenneth Harris, president and general director of the National Business League (NBL), claims through e -mail that the damage caused by the lack of Dei programs in black firms is overrated and aren’t justified by real data. He claims that lower than about 1% of federal agreements are granted to black firms.

NBL identifies because the oldest and largest national trading group in America for black firms, with over 120,000 members. It was founded in 1900 by Booker T. Washington.

Advertisement

Harris maintains that Dei initiatives were largely ineffective, with the advantages disproportionately accumulate for white women, LGBTQ+ people and other minority groups. He added that Black Business Enterprises (BBES) remain marginalized and at the underside of the economic caste.

“The failure of Dei programs in equilibrium economic possibilities of black companies emphasize the critical need for system changes,” says Harris.

“To materialize this, disassembly and re -image of Dei must be made not by those who historically managed these initiatives, but by those who were economically pressed and excluded,” adds Harris. “Only then can we predict a change in which BBE can develop, producing, creating and developing within our own limits?”

The owners of American small businesses are more afraid of monetary falls regarding business policy. Trump has just announced that he would submit an application Fresh 25% tariffs All over the import of steel and aluminum. He also plans to announce mutual tariffs this week in Canada and Mexico after delaying these taxes to a month last week.

Advertisement

New questionnaire From the equalization, the North American platform of small firms network shows that 30% of those owners expect revenue loss as a consequence of the proposed tariffs, and 15% provide for giant declines. However, only 18% provide for all types of sales, and only 9% expect significant profits. Forty percent of the tariffs is not going to affect, and 12% aren’t certain.

Voice of Main Street, quarterly opinion vote Entrepreneurs within the network of most small firms claim that 53% of small firms are apprehensive about tariffs negatively affecting their activities, and 77% apprehensive in regards to the announced tariffs that negatively affect the US economy.

In the sector of immigration policy, the survey stated that 37% of entrepreneurs are apprehensive about mass deportations negatively affecting their enterprises or suppliers, while 69% are concerned in regards to the downside of mass deportations within the country’s economy.

Advertisement

(Tagstranslate) Elon Musk

This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Eagles and bosses have already won the winners of Philadelphia and Kansas City

Published

on

By

If you reside in the areas of the metro in Philadelphia or Kansas City, congratulations: the indisputable fact that your city has reached Super Bowl translates into about USD 200 additional in your pocket.

He agrees – regardless of whether Philadelphia Eagles or Kansas City Chiefs will win an excellent game on February 9, each cities have won economic victory. Studies show that Playoffs themselves are enough to extend personal income in the region. And in case your team wins, you and your city will get even greater growth.

This Gratel doesn’t come from increased sales of goods, as you would possibly expect. Instead, happiness is a key driver. A successful season raises the mood of fans, which is not directly – to larger expenses and performance.

Advertisement

Why the win pays

I’m macroeconomist fascinated by sports economyAnd my colleague Christian end The University of Xavier is a psychologist specializing in fans’ behavior. Together, we published two studies connecting our areas of knowledge: “Winning proposal: Economic impact of successful NFL franchise“And”Team success, productivity and economic impact. “

In a study using data from the end of the twentieth century and at the starting of the twenty first century, we discovered that when the team moves from zero to 11 wins-the number needed for Playoffs-a home region sees a mean increase in income per person by around USD 200 per yr, corrected for inflation. We also discovered that the Super Bowl win was related to the premiere of USD 33, re -corrected with inflation.

When you multiply USD 200 by 6 million people living in a metropolitan area in Philadelphia and 2 million in the Kansas City region, that is because of all the money.

It’s about happiness, not T -shirts

If you’ve got ever been at the Super Bowl parade, you possibly can assume that increasing your income is related to people spending more on teams related to the team. But research shows that skilled sports teams normally have little impact on local income.

Advertisement

Even the Super Bowl host doesn’t seem a lot: our research shows that folks are higher economically if their local team wins Super Bowl than if their local area is the host.

So if people don’t spend more directly on the team, something else have to be happening. Our work pointed to 2 possible explanations – each related to happiness.

First of all, we hypothesized that happier people normally spend more. And when people spend more, this money is returned to the population by wages, so people’s income is growing. The secret is that folks spend more on the whole lot, not only things related to sports teams.

Because the football season normally ends in December, it might be that completely satisfied parents, who’re fans of the local NFL team, spend more on Christmas presents for his or her children. When the Super Bowl stretches later for the winter, family members can get nicer floral bouquets and more chocolate for Valentine’s Day, when the local team wins Super Bowl.

Advertisement
Happy people – like coach Kansas City Chiefs, Andy Reid, left, celebrating victory in the Super Bowl in the team on February 11, 2024 – they sometimes spend more.
Steph Chambers/Getty Images

Another possible path is increased performance. Psychological research has discovered this happier individuals are more productive. As the season passes and the team wins, he has the reason that folks in the area shall be completely satisfied and work hard.

Previous studies confirm this concept. For example, a 2011 study Federal regulatory authorities are more productive. In places where private corporations dominate in the local economy – which suggests that almost all of the rest of the US – a rise in performance would lead the company to a more profitable, which could lead on to residents of higher earnings. Not even fans see the advantages when their neighbors are happier, spend more and work hard.

Regardless of how the Super Bowl seems, each the Metropolitan areas of Philadelphia and Kansas City have already won, because each fans and out of every region can make the most of higher income.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

Business and Finance

Dei Target’s drama has just become more mess – and now investors want to recover money

Published

on

By

The ongoing controversy Dei Target simply turned to legal trading. The retail giant – along with the director general Brian Cornell and his current and former members of the board – stands within the face of the collective process, accusing them of misleading investors of monetary risk related to the corporate’s initiatives, own capital and integration (Dei).

A collective lawsuit filed by City of Riviera Beach Police Emeryant Fund in Florida claims that the goal issued “false and misleading” statements regarding his dei, environment and social policy. According to Reuters, Shareholders’ notification also states that the corporate has deceived them to pay inflated share prices and unknowingly supported the “improper use of investor funds to serve political and social purposes.”

The claim also refers to the controversial Pride 2023 LGBT campaign. As previously reported by Thegrio, the vendor was on the Center of Cultural War, when he debuted with pride goods, only to later draw chosen items after the confrontations in the shop aroused security concerns. This, after all, caused even greater indignation – each from those that opposed the gathering and those that felt betrayed by its removal.

Advertisement

“For over a decade, Target offered a range of products to celebrate the month of pride,” said Target in May 2023, on ABC messages. “Since the introduction of this year’s collection, we have experienced threats affecting the sense of security and well -being of our team during work. Considering these unstable circumstances, we introduce corrections of our plans, including removal of elements that were in the center of the most important confrontational behavior. Currently, we focus on dealing with our constant commitment to the LGBTQia+ community and standing with them when we celebrate the month of pride and all year round. “

Despite public statements, investors claim that the choice led to a major decrease in shares and this purpose didn’t reveal the slack, which caused a decrease within the 22% Target share price on November 20, 2024, by breaking around USD 15.7 billion out there value.

The lawsuit appears among the many wider corporate retreat from Dei’s obligations. At the start of this 12 months, the major brands – including Walmart, Meta and McDonald’s – change Dei’s efforts after political control, especially from conservative circles. Now that investors are pushing one another, the longer term of Dei corporate strategies stays uncertain.

A growing list of companies that have stopped or got involved in diversity strategies and inclusion strategies

(Tagstranslat) goal

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : thegrio.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending