Connect with us

Politics and Current

50 Cent Claims Black Men Will Vote for Trump Because of RICO



50 Cent, Trump, Chelsea Handler

50 Cent’s recent visit to Capitol Hill, during which he advocated for Black inclusion in the luxurious spirits industry, was overshadowed by his controversial statement about Donald (*50*) 2024 presidential campaign.

The hip-hop mogul was in front of the Capitol on June 5. to speak with reporters when CBS News correspondent Nikole Killion asked him in regards to the “importance of African Americans” within the upcoming presidential election, he reports.

“I can see how they identify with Trump,” 50 Cent replied.

When asked why he thought Black men would vote for Trump, 50 Cent replied, “Because they face RICO charges.”

When asked who he would vote for in November, the G-Unit founder replied that he was still undecided. This comes 4 years after he expressed public support for (*50*) 2020 campaign before backtracking on his comments.

After posting a clip of the interview on social media, 50 Cent faced backlash from many who believed his comments about black men voting for Trump were rooted in racism and ignorance.

“Well, black men are not a monolith, so this statement is bullshit,” one person wrote in response.

“50 Cent does NOT speak and I cannot express this strongly enough, he does NOT speak for Black Americans!” another person added.

50 Cent’s ex-girlfriend Chelsea Handler also weighed in on the subject and slammed the rapper for seeming to support Trump. However, Handler also faced criticism for her tone-deaf reasoning as to why 50 Cent shouldn’t support the previous president.

“I had to remind him that he’s black, so he can’t vote for Donald Trump,” the comedian said in a video circulating on social media.

Now Handler faces accusations of being a “racist” and “insulting the intellectual autonomy of black people.” Meanwhile, 50 Cent has yet to reply to the criticism he’s receiving over his comments about Donald Trump.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics and Current

Three white men who chased and shot a black man in Florida have avoided hate crime charges




Three white men who pleaded guilty to charges related to the murder of a black man in Jacksonville, Florida, will likely be sentenced this month for his or her roles in the murder.

Ryan Nichols, Daniel DeGuardia and Holden Doldson were arrested after the body of 39-year-old Gary Jackson was found behind a dumpster on May 2, 2023.

Ryan Nichols (left), Daniel DeGuardia (center) and Holden Dodson (right) pleaded guilty to charges in reference to the murder of 39-year-old Gary Jackson in Jacksonville, Florida. (Photo: First Coast News/YouTube screenshot)

According to police, all three men chased the victim in a automobile after 2 a.m. At one point, as Jackson tried to cover behind a dumpster, Nichols jumped out of the automobile and chased him on foot. A short while later, Nichols was seen returning to the automobile and all three men left. Police found Jackson’s body later that morning with multiple gunshot wounds.

All three men were arrested the subsequent day. Nichols, 20, was charged with second-degree murder, while DeGuardia and Dodson were charged with accessory after the actual fact.

Last week, a judge sentenced Nichols to 40 years in prison.

Both Dodson and DeGuardia he testified during Nichols’ sentencing. Dodson said everyone was drinking and doing cocaine the night of Jackson’s murder. Only Dodson and Nichols were armed.

According to Dodson’s testimony, it was Nichols who began chasing Jackson, and after a short chase, he returned to the automobile and accused Jackson of stealing his gun. DeGuardia said they got into the automobile and Nichols told him where to go.

Last yr, News4JAX reported that witnesses told the station that the three men had contacted Jackson in what they suspected was a drug-related relationship before the encounter took a turn for the more serious. “He ran away with a gun because one of the boys showed him a gun and was waving it,” the station reported reported said one witness.

After they found Jackson, DeGuardia claimed that Nichols took Dodson’s gun and got out of the automobile.

“(Nichols) said something like, ‘I do know where you are hiding.’ They’re going to shoot you,” DeGuardia said.

Both Dodson and DeGuardia said Nichols shot Jackson several times behind the dumpster, and when Nichols returned to the automobile, all of them drove away.

“(Nichols) said, ‘I just shot that N-word in the head,’ that’s one of the statements. And “nobody robs me.” I was almost bragging,” Dodson said.

No one was charged with a hate crime for the murder. At the time of the arrests, the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office said there was no evidence to suggest bias or bias was a factor in the killing.

Jackson’s members of the family asked the judge to impose maximum prison sentences for all three men.

“Three monsters against one black man. They were after my uncle” – Jackson’s niece, Annequineice Johnson he told MotionNewsJax.

“Ryan, Daniel and Holden cursed me out as soon as I woke up, thanking God for letting me live to see another day and praying for my family and friends,” said Jackson’s aunt, Leanne Butler.

Dodson, 22, and DeGuardia, 19, face a maximum of 15 years in prison. The verdict will likely be announced on June 28.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

Black women forced to choose between abortion and rent in post-Dobbs America




Jenice Fountain saw women forced to make seemingly not possible decisions.

As an Alabama-based reproductive justice advocate, Fountain has a front row seat in America in the post-Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization era, in which the Supreme Court struck down abortion rights two years ago. Although abortion has been legal since Roe v. Wade in 1973, abortion is banned or severely restricted in nearly half of the country’s 50 states.

Alabama is considered one of 14 states which have enacted a whole abortion ban, forcing residents of considered one of the nation’s poorest states to travel for the procedure and sometimes choose between covering their basic needs and their future.

“At the community level, I hear people saying, yes, I have care. But first I went to Georgia and then to Ohio. So now I don’t pay rent and I don’t know where I’m going to live,” Fountain said. “If my client is now homeless because she had to have an abortion, I don’t consider that a win.”

As executive director Yellowhammer Fund, Fountain provides communities with financial support and resources for reproductive justice. Reproductive justice is a framework developed by Black women activists in the Nineteen Nineties that focuses not only on procedures similar to termination of pregnancy, but more broadly supports their right to have or not have children in a protected and healthy environment.

But since Roe v. Wade was overturned two years ago, Fountain has seen the core idea of ​​reproductive justice challenged in tangible ways, especially for marginalized groups. Alabama’s Black population is above the national average, with Blacks making up 1 / 4 of your entire state (over 25%). Fountain said that in a state that after sparked the civil rights movement with the Birmingham bus boycott and that has faced a history of brutal racist attacks and violence, there may be a way of despair that has led many women to consider that in the face of an unintended pregnancy has no alternative but to move forward.

“I see people saying, ‘Well, we’re in Alabama.’ We’ve become accustomed to another extra layer of oppression, so we’ll just be born now. Where can I safely give birth? Where can I get the funds for this?” The fountain is obtainable.

Fountain says the work of this era will not be nearly funding abortion, but additionally a few holistic approach to supporting people, especially marginalized groups who find themselves targeted by state institutions after giving birth and struggling to make ends meet.

Abortion rights activists gather outside the United States Supreme Court on April 15, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)

“We had to create a legal fund because most of the legal funds we were able to contact wanted to support people who would be penalized for getting (abortion) out of state,” she said. “But we are saying, ‘Hey, they need legal support since the Department of Human Resources is now involved in this pregnancy that they otherwise would have terminated, but now they’re trying to separate the family.’

The Yellowhammer Fund can be involved in a lawsuit against Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall after he threatened to prosecute anyone who helped a pregnant woman have an out-of-state abortion. Despite attempts to dismiss the lawsuit, a federal judge ruled last month in order that the Yellowhammer Fund lawsuit can proceed.

The organization said the specter of criminal prosecution was enough to intimidate them into stopping their work and violating freedom of speech. Numerous civil rights organizations agree and support their efforts.

“If Attorney General Marshall is able to criminalize abortion-related speech and assistance, more pregnant women will have difficulty finding out-of-state care and the financial and logistical support needed to obtain that care without the knowledge and insights of their chosen provider,” she said Alison Mollman, legal director of the ACLU of Alabama, said in a press release following last month’s ruling.

“This could have deadly consequences for Alabamians who live in a state that has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the country, and especially for Black women, who account for a disproportionate share of maternal deaths,” she continued.

It’s this stark reality that makes Fountain challenge reproductive rights advocates to do greater than just donate to abortion funds.

“If we do this work and call it reproductive justice work or even abortion advocacy, it has to look like we are truly supporting people with their care needs,” she said. – Because not everyone gets to leave the state. That’s just the truth.”

Featured Stories

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading

Politics and Current

A California Assembly member tearfully defends the reparations bill




Reparations, California


A Democratic California assemblyman has gained immense popularity after tearfully defending proposed reparations bills. The Republican lawmaker argued that non-white residents mustn’t need to pay for reparations.

The bill, titled SB 1331, followed the recommendations of the state’s reparations task force, behind the

Despite progress on the Assembly Judiciary Committee vote, the potential laws continues to face resistance, particularly from Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez.

Sanchez argued that minorities, particularly Latinos and Asians, make up greater than half of California’s population. Sanchez also identifies as Latino.

She stated that they “have nothing to do with slavery, discrimination, Jim Crow laws” and wouldn’t have to pay reparations. According to economists, the cost of reparations for Black Californians may very well be greater than $800 billion.

“To pay for this, it would take a significant tax increase the likes of which this state has never seen before,” Sanchez explained. “I acknowledge and acknowledge the painful part of our history, (but) people today should not have to pay for the pain of our past.”

However, MP Ash Kalra broke down in tears as he explained the need for reparations, especially in the form of cash. Kalra also made history in 2016 as the first Indian-American woman elected to the California State Legislature.

“I understand that it’s difficult to ask those of us who currently serve in the legislature to make such commitments, but nobody has asked black families for generations whether their property may very well be taken away from them, whether or not they may very well be enslaved, it was nice until…. ” he began to say, and his eyes stuffed with tears.

When he regained his composure, he added, “If only it would be okay to put your children in generations of poverty. For hundreds of years, this country has become a superpower based on the free labor of African descendants. We need to recognize that.”

According to the bill’s writer, state senator Steven Bradford, the bill could expand the scope of compensation in forms aside from monetary payments. Free health care and tuition got here up as potential measures.

This is one in all 4 compensation bills passed by the committee to date.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading


Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.