google-site-verification=cXrcMGa94PjI5BEhkIFIyc9eZiIwZzNJc4mTXSXtGRM Fisker’s Ocean SUV was investigated for doors that would not open - 360WISE MEDIA
Connect with us

Technology

Fisker’s Ocean SUV was investigated for doors that would not open

Published

on

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened third investigation at Fisker’s Ocean SUV, an electrical vehicle startup, this time specializing in door opening problems.

NHTSA’s Office of Defect Investigation (ODI) says in a brand new notice that it has received 14 complaints from owners who were unable to open the doors to their Fisker Oceans from either the within or outside. The agency says complaints indicate “intermittent failure” of the door lock and handle. The complaints also raised the chance that the emergency bypass mechanism was also not working.

According to internal documents TechCrunch reported exclusively in February, customers have been reporting to Fisker for months about getting stuck in or out of their automotive. Some of those incidents were related to the troublesome Ocean keychain. But a brand new safety probe suggests a deeper problem with the SUV’s doors. The investigation is often known as a “preliminary assessment”, which the ODI typically resolves inside eight months.

The Ocean SUV is already under investigation by the ODI following braking problems and complaints concerning the vehicle rolling on uneven surfaces. The company has not announced any recalls of Ocean products. The company did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

The third probe is opened when Fisker is on the sting. In March, it halted production on “Ocean” and reported just $121 million to the bank. Fisker still has 1000’s of Ocean-branded SUVs in stock that it’s attempting to sell, either directly or through its emerging dealership model, and most recently cut prices by as much as 39% in a desperate try to generate sales. It was recently delisted from the New York Stock Exchange. A possible partnership with Nissan fell through, jeopardizing an try to secure $150 million in rescue funds.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com

Technology

Serena Williams’ Husband Spends Cinco De Mayo With Early Reddit Investor Snoop Dogg, ‘Never Forget These Days’

Published

on

By

Serena Williams, Snoop Dogg, Alexis Ohanian


Serena Williams’ tech entrepreneur husband Alexis Ohanian spent the Cinco De Mayo holiday with certainly one of his wife’s hometown heroes, who was certainly one of the early investors on his Reddit platform.

On Sunday, May 5, Ohanian was outside celebrating a “beautiful day” in Los Angeles with certainly one of the town’s most outstanding figures. In a photograph shared on Twitter, the Reddit co-founder praised Snoop Dogg’s early support for his billion-dollar company.

“Beautiful day in Los Angeles. I appreciate this city very much. Have to meet lots of friends” wrote Ohanian.

“Some of you might know that @SnoopDogg was certainly one of our first investors in @reddit during our spin-off and pivot. Few people wanted to speculate in us then. Snoop managed to do it. And you’ll always remember the primary day.

Launched in 2005 on Reddit serves as an internet community where people from everywhere in the world can connect and communicate about any topic. Ohanian co-founded the corporate with Steve Huffman while they were each attending the University of Virginia. The company began to grow after connecting with Aaron Swartz of Infogami, who rewrote the coding for Reddit.

Just a yr after launching, Ohanian and Huffman sold Reddit to Conde Nast for about $10 million to $20 million. As user numbers and valuations continued to grow, investment flowed in. Until 2014, when Reddit was precious with a reported $500 million, Snoop Dogg has joined a bunch of investors in a $50 million funding round on the link-sharing and discussion site.

It was the investment group’s organizer who approached Snoop due to his celebrity status and recognition on the location’s “Ask Me Anything” message boards. Snoop was also high on Reddit’s wish list of investors trying to join the corporate.

“He’s like a Reddit superstar,” Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder of Open AI, said of Snoop Dogg. “The site loves him. Snoop was high on the list. We asked him to speculate and he agreed.

The “Gin and Juice” rapper doesn’t actually discuss his early investment in Reddit, but he has previously shared how he got into the market.

“I went inside. Understand me? I didn’t wish to tell everyone, but I’m a part of Reddit too.” – Snoop Dogg he told Ohanian on GGN News in 2017.

Reddit is currently valued at $10.68 billion, with a share price of $67.67. This is a drastic jump from the $5 billion valuation in 2021.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Apple’s ‘Crush’ ad is disgusting

Published

on

By

Apple’s ‘Crush’ ad is disgusting

You can generally depend on Apple for clever and well-produced ads, but on this case it missed the mark is the latest, which presents a tower of creative tools and analog items literally squeezed into the shape of an iPad. Many people, including myself, have had a negative and visceral response to this, and we must always discuss why.

This doesn’t just occur because we witness things being destroyed. There are countless video channels dedicated to crushing, burning, exploding and customarily destroying on a regular basis objects. Plus, everyone knows that some of these incidents occur daily at transfer stations and recycling centers. So that is not it.

And it isn’t that these items themselves are so priceless. Sure, a piano is price something. But we see them blowing up in motion movies on a regular basis and we do not feel bad. I like pianos, but that doesn’t suggest we will not do with no few old, unused pianos. Same with the remainder: it’s mostly junk that you could buy on Craigslist for a couple of bucks or on the dump without spending a dime. (Maybe not an assembly station.)

The problem is not with the movie itself, which, considering the individuals who shot and shot it, is actually thoroughly made. The problem is not the media, however the message.

We all understand the supposed point of promoting: you’ll be able to do all of it on an iPad. Great. Of course, we could also do that on the last iPad, but this one is thinner (by the best way, nobody asked for it; now the cases don’t fit on this case) and by some imaginary percentage higher.

But what all of us understand, because unlike Apple’s promoting executives, is that the world we live in is that the things that get fragmented here represent material, tangible, and real. And what is true has value. A worth that Apple clearly believes it may possibly crush into one other black mirror.

This belief is disgusting to me. And apparently for a lot of others as well.

Destruction of the piano within the music video Or MythBusters episode it is actually an act of creation. Even destroying a piano (or monitor, paint can, or drum set) for no reason is wasteful at worst!

But Apple is destroying these items – all you would like is a small device from the corporate that may do all this and more, and doesn’t need annoying things like strings, keys, buttons, brushes or mixing stations.

We are all coping with the results of the mass shift of media towards digital and all the time online technology. In some ways it’s really good! I feel technology has played an enormous role.

But from one other, equally real viewpoint, the digital transformation seems harmful and compelled – a technotopic, billionaire-approved vision of a future during which every child has a man-made intelligence best friend and may learn to play a virtual guitar on a chilly glass screen.

Does your child like music? They don’t need a harp, throw it within the trash. An iPad is enough. Do they like painting? Here’s Apple Pencil, pretty much as good as pens, watercolors, oils! Books? Don’t make us laugh! Destroy them. The paper is worthless, use one other screen. In fact, why not read in Apple Vision Pro, on even faker paper?

Apple seems to forget that it’s things in the actual world – the very things that Apple destroyed – that give value to fake versions of those things in the primary place.

A virtual guitar is not going to replace an actual guitar; it’s like considering that a book can replace the creator.

That doesn’t suggest we will not value each for various reasons. But Apple’s ad sends the message that the long run it wants won’t include paint bottles, knobs to show, sculptures, physical instruments or paper books. Of course, this is the long run he has been working on for us for years, he just didn’t put it so bluntly before.

When someone tells you who they’re, imagine them. Apple is very clear about what it is and what the long run needs to be. If this future doesn’t gross you out, you are welcome.

This article was originally published on : techcrunch.com
Continue Reading

Technology

Fake AI Photos of Rihanna at the Met Gala Trick Social Media Users

Published

on

By

Met Gala, Rihanna, Fake AI Photos


A disorder indeed.

Fake AI photos of Rihanna at the Met Gala fooled social media users into pondering she was walking the red carpet.

According to , Rihanna missed the event, which took place on May 6, because of the flu. However, her “photos” continued to flow into on social media. Deepfake images presented an incredibly realistic photo founder of Fenty Beauty. She wore a wealthy white dress decorated with flowers matching this yr’s theme, “Garden of Time.”

However, upon further evaluation, it turned out that the photos were a hoax. Rihanna wasn’t the only victim. The Associated Press reported that other singers reminiscent of Katy Perry have fallen victim to artificial intelligence generators. Her AI photos gained traction to this extent where Perry needed to disclose to her mother that the photos weren’t real, posting a screenshot of the conversation on her Instagram Story. Rihanna herself has not commented on this matter yet.

The photos are the result of generative artificial intelligence, typically used to create photos that might not otherwise have been created. While this is not the first time this technology has been used against celebrities, more nefarious uses have led to problems in the past. Sexually explicit photos of Taylor Swift went viral earlier this yr, prompting X to dam searches for them.

As the use of AI increases, so do the potential consequences. Currently, regulations are still developing to guard individuals from the harmful effects of this technology. US teens deemed ‘image-based sexual abuse’ use AI ‘nudification’ app to abuse young girls. Fake nude photos are one other way revenge porn perpetuates itself, prompting lawmakers to take motion as AI image generators develop into more available.

Despite the relatively innocuous nature of the Met Gala image fraud, the incident actually raises the growing problem of unregulated AI images, especially when the masses are unable to tell apart the real from the fake.


This article was originally published on : www.blackenterprise.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending