google-site-verification=cXrcMGa94PjI5BEhkIFIyc9eZiIwZzNJc4mTXSXtGRM Indeed announces the possibility of writing work experiences based on artificial intelligence and support for multiple CVs - 360WISE MEDIA
Connect with us


Indeed announces the possibility of writing work experiences based on artificial intelligence and support for multiple CVs



Indeed profile revamp

Recruitment site Indeed has redesigned the profile page for users, allowing individuals to make use of its AI-powered writing tool to enhance their work experience, and has also added support for multiple resumes. The company has also launched a set of smart sourcing packages for recruiters with features similar to AI-powered candidate summaries and custom messaging.

Indeed, a Recruiter Holdings company, is revamping its profile page and adding AI-powered features to raised compete with rivals like LinkedIn, and ZipRecruiter. A brand new AI-powered work experience module helps people create higher descriptions of various projects.

The company can be adding support for saving as much as five resumes, so anyone can easily select the most fitted copy when applying for various positions. Both features might be available soon, Indeed said.

A change of profile indeed

Image credits: Actually

The job search portal already had a switch to make a user’s profile visible to recruiters. But now the company has enabled this feature by default and provides quick access on the settings page.

On the other hand, the company offers an intelligent intelligence suite for recruiters that’s designed to cut back so-called “irrelevant outreach” – when employers contact candidates who don’t fit the job profile. In addition to advanced search filters, corporations even have access to AI-powered candidate summaries.

AI summary profile

Image credits: Actually

Indeed can be adding AI-powered smart messaging and automatic interview scheduling. An AI-powered messaging tool allows hiring managers to create or modify communications with job seekers. In testing, the company observed that recruiters using Smart Sourcing during hiring saved as much as six hours per week.

When we asked the company the way it avoids bias or ensures its AI-powered summaries don’t miss key details, Indeed said it employs responsible AI team thwart harm.

Indeed’s rival LinkedIn has also introduced AI into many features similar to learning, recruiting, marketing sales, messaging and profile enhancement.

Deepti Patibandla, senior director of product at Indeed, told TechCrunch on a call that the company desires to proceed to focus on hiring.

“While LinkedIn is more of an expert social network or platform, at Indeed we would like to rent more people. This is the core value of our business. As a differentiator, we would like to facilitate the recruitment process,” she said.

“We want to make sure that people will find the right job and will not be inundated with random job offers. For now, these two elements are the most important to us. Longer term, we see an opportunity for users who come to Indeed to chart their career path.”

Last yr, Indeed laid off 2,200 employees, or 15% of its staff. CEO Chris Hyams said at the time that the organization was “simply too big for what lies ahead.”

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Fintech CRED generally secures consent to a payment aggregator license




CRED has received general approval for a payments aggregator license, a boost that might help the Indian fintech startup higher serve customers and produce recent products and concepts to market faster.

The Bengaluru-based startup, valued at $6.4 billion, received approval in principle from the Reserve Bank of India for a payments aggregator license this week, according to two sources acquainted with the matter.

CRED didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Last yr, the RBI gave in-principle approval for payment aggregator licenses to several firms, including Reliance Payment and Pine Labs. Typically, it takes the central bank nine months to a yr to give full approval after approval in principle.

Payment aggregators play a key role in facilitating online transactions by acting as intermediaries between merchants and customers. The RBI approval enables fintech firms to expand their offerings and compete more effectively available in the market.

Without a license, fintech startups must depend on third-party payment processors to process transactions, and these players may not prioritize such requests. Obtaining a license allows fintech firms to directly process payments, reduce costs, gain greater control over payment flow and directly onboard merchants. Additionally, licensed payment aggregators can settle funds directly with sellers.

The license could also allow CRED to make it available to more retailers and “be everywhere their customers shop,” an industry executive said.

In principle, the approval of the license for CRED comes as India’s central bank has been cracking down on many business practices within the fintech industry in recent quarters and generally increasing caution in granting any form of licenses to firms. In a stunning move, the Reserve Bank of India earlier this yr ordered Paytm Payments Bank to halt most of its operations.

CRED, which incorporates Tiger Global, Coatue, Peak XV, Sofina, Ribbit Capital and Dragoneer, serves a large section of high-net-worth clients in India. It originally launched six years ago with a feature to help members repay their bank card bills on time, but has since expanded to include loans and several other other products. In February, it announced it had reached an agreement to buy mutual fund and investment platform Kuvera.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading


Internet users are getting younger; now the UK is considering whether artificial intelligence can help protect them




Artificial intelligence appeared in sights governments concerned about their potential for misuse for fraud, disinformation and other malicious activities on the Internet; currently in the UK, the regulator is preparing to analyze how artificial intelligence is getting used to combat a few of these, particularly in relation to content that is harmful to children.

Ofcomthe regulatory body accountable for enforcing UK regulations Internet Security Actannounced that it plans to launch a consultation on how artificial intelligence and other automated tools are currently used and the way they can be utilized in the future to proactively detect and take away illegal content online, specifically to protect children from harmful content and detect child abuse in sexual purposes, material previously difficult to detect.

These tools could be a part of a wider set of Ofcom proposals that concentrate on keeping children protected online. Ofcom said consultation on the comprehensive proposals would begin in the coming weeks, with a consultation on artificial intelligence happening later this yr.

Mark Bunting, director of Ofcom’s online safety group, says interest in artificial intelligence starts with taking a look at how well it is currently used as a control tool.

“Some services are already using these tools to identify and protect children from such content,” he told TechCrunch. “But there is not much details about the accuracy and effectiveness of those tools. We want to take a look at ways we can be sure that the industry assesses when it uses them, ensuring that risks to free speech and privacy are managed.

One likely consequence will likely be Ofcom recommending how and what platforms should assess, which could potentially lead not only to platforms adopting more sophisticated tools, but in addition to potential fines in the event that they fail to make improvements to blocking content or creating higher ways to stopping younger users from seeing this.

“As with many internet safety regulations, companies have a responsibility to ensure they take the appropriate steps and use the appropriate tools to protect users,” he said.

There will likely be each critics and supporters of those moves. Artificial intelligence researchers are finding increasingly sophisticated ways to make use of artificial intelligence detect deepfakes, for instance, in addition to for online user verification. And yet there are just as a lot of them skeptics who note that AI detection is not foolproof.

Ofcom announced the consultation on artificial intelligence tools at the same time because it published its latest study into kid’s online interactions in the UK, which found that overall, more younger children are connected to the web than ever before, to the extent that that Ofcom is currently ceasing activity amongst increasingly younger age groups.

Nearly 1 / 4, 24%, of all children ages 5 to 7 now have their very own smartphones, and when tablets are included, that number increases to 76%, in response to a survey of U.S. parents. The same age group is far more prone to eat media on these devices: 65% have made voice and video calls (in comparison with 59% only a yr ago), and half of kids (in comparison with 39% a yr ago) watch streaming media.

Age restrictions are getting lighter on some popular social media apps, but whatever the restrictions, they aren’t enforced in the UK anyway. Ofcom found that around 38% of kids aged 5 to 7 use social media. The hottest application amongst them is Meta’s WhatsApp (37%). We were probably relieved for the first time when flagship image app Meta became less popular than viral sensation ByteDance. It turned out that 30% of kids aged 5 to 7 use TikTok, and “only” 22% use Instagram. Discord accomplished the list, but is much less popular at just 4%.

About one third, 32% of kids of this age use the Internet on their very own, and 30% of fogeys said that they weren’t bothered by their minor children having social media profiles. YouTube Kids stays the hottest network amongst younger users (48%).

Games which were the hottest amongst children for years are currently utilized by 41% of kids aged 5 to 7, and 15% of kids at this age play shooting games.

Although 76% of fogeys surveyed said they’d talked to their young children about web safety, Ofcom points out that there are query marks between what a baby sees and what they can report. When examining older children aged 8-17, Ofcom interviewed them face-to-face. It found that 32% of kids said they’d seen disturbing content online, but only 20% of their parents said they’d reported anything.

Even considering some inconsistencies in reporting, “the research suggests a link between older children’s exposure to potentially harmful content online and what they share with their parents about their online experiences,” Ofcom writes. Disturbing content is just considered one of the challenges: deepfakes are also an issue. Ofcom reported that amongst 16-17-year-olds, 25% said they were unsure they may tell fake content from real content online.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading


Robots could make work less important for human co-workers




Much has been written (and can proceed to be written) concerning the impact of automation on the labor market. In the short term, many employers have complained about their inability to fill positions and retain employees, further accelerating robot adoption. It is unclear what long-term impact the sort of radical change can have on the labor market in the long run.

However, an often neglected aspect of this conversation is how human staff discuss their robotic colleagues. There is way to be said for systems that enhance or eliminate the more strenuous elements of physical work. But can technology even have a negative impact on worker morale? Both things can actually be true at the identical time.

The Brookings Institute released this week results findings from several surveys conducted over the past decade and a half to evaluate the impact of robotics on the “meaning” of work. Team of advisors thus defines this admittedly abstract concept: :

“When examining what makes work meaningful, we draw on self-determination theory. According to this theory, meeting three innate psychological needs – competence, autonomy and relatedness – is vital to motivating employees and enabling them to feel purpose through their work.

The data was collected from worker surveys conducted in 14 industries in 20 European countries and in comparison with data on robot adoption published by the International Federation of Robotics. Industries covered by the study included automotive, chemical products, food and beverage, and metal manufacturing.

The institute reports a negative impact on employees’ perceived level of meaningfulness and autonomy.

“If the number of robots in the food industry matched that in the automotive industry,” notes Brookings, “we estimate that meaningful work would decline by 6.8% and autonomy by 7.5%. The autonomy aspect speaks to ongoing concerns about whether the implementation of robotics in industrial settings may also make the roles performed by human counterparts more robotic. Of course, the counterpoint has often been made that these systems effectively remove a lot of probably the most repetitive elements of those roles.

The institute further suggests that some of these impacts are felt across roles and demographics. “We found that the negative consequences of robotization for the meaningfulness of work are the same, regardless of the employees’ education level, skill level or the tasks they perform,” we read within the article.

When it involves how you can take care of this alteration, the reply probably won’t be to easily reject automation. As long as robots proceed to have a positive impact on corporate bottom lines, their adoption will proceed to grow rapidly.

Brookings resident Milena Nikolova offers a seemingly easy solution when she writes, “If companies have mechanisms in place to ensure that people and machines work together rather than compete to perform tasks, machines can help improve employee well-being.”

This is one in every of the important thing drivers behind automation firms touting collaborative robotics as an alternative of direct substitute of staff. A contest between humans and their robotic counterparts will almost actually lead to a loss.

This article was originally published on :
Continue Reading


Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.