Connect with us

International

Syria, Russia and Türkiye – an uneasy alliance changing world politics

Published

on

The end of the crisis in Aleppo i Syrian ceasefire created an unlikely alliance. Relations between Russia, Turkey and Syria are crucial not just for the Middle East, but additionally for global geopolitics.

The leaders of all three countries – Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Bashar al-Assad – unexpectedly rose to prominence around the identical time, accompanied by a certain level of optimism. But over the past 16 years, they’ve joined a growing club of populist and authoritarian leaders.

Vladimir Putin first became president of Russia in 2000 – young, energetic and promising to lift Russia from the ashes of the fallen Soviet Union.

Advertisement

Erdogan rose to prominence in 2003 after a severe economic crisis elevated him to the position of prime minister of Turkey, carrying with him the hopes of the Turkish people. His first two terms of presidency were marked by attempts to affix the European Union, liberal reforms and economic growth.

Bashar al-Assad succeeded his dictatorial father in 2000. His older brother, who was expected to take over the presidency, died in a automobile accident in 1994. His youth and Western education seemed that he would make Syria more liberal and democratic. However, behind a friendly and liberal façade, Assad continued to run a police state.

During this time, Erdogan developed a private friendship with Assad. Erdogan invited him on vacation to Turkey, calling him “my brother Assad.”

By 2010, Turkey was heralded as a model country where democracy and Islam coexist. Encouraged by his political success and growing popularity within the Arab world, Erdogan began to indicate ambitions for leadership within the Muslim world. It began to emulate EU-style policies, establishing visa-free travel and economic partnerships with other Muslim countries, starting with Syria and Lebanon.

Advertisement

Between 2004 and 2011, Putin also intensified Russia’s relations with Syria at a vital moment through the invasion of Iraq by the United States and the international coalition. By 2011, Iraq was destabilized and polarized along Sunni-Shia sectarian lines.

Dissatisfied with growing U.S. and Western influence over Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Putin increased Russia’s presence in Syria by developing and enlarging its naval base in Tartus and strengthened his ties with Assad.

Then he got here Arab Spring from 2011.

The strategy for Putin was clear: support the Assad regime and then challenge Western domination not only of the Middle East but additionally of the geopolitical world order. At the identical time, it could be a convenient distraction growing unrest and protests within the country and Russian aggression in places like Georgia.

Advertisement

During Civil war in SyriaPutin has grow to be the guardian of the Shiite alliance between Iran, Syria and Shiite political forces in Iraq and Lebanon.

For Erdogan, the Arab Spring meant an acceleration in his ambition to realize leadership within the Sunni world. His “brother Assad” became enemy primary because a possible Islamist takeover of Syria fit his leadership vision higher than the Shiite and secular nature of the Assad regime. Erdogan has actively supported plenty of Syrian opposition groups through his logistical presence in Turkey and constant flow of resources.

For Erdogan, being anti-Assad also meant being anti-Russian – until 4 of Erdogan’s ministers were hit serious corruption allegations in 2013. In response, Erdogan selected the trail of authoritarianism, purging and firing members of the police and judiciary liable for investigating corruption.

The narrative was easy: foreign powers (i.e. the West) didn’t want Turkey’s growing influence within the region, so that they cooperated with domestic forces to overthrow the federal government. Most importantly, this stance signaled Erdogan’s departure from the Western bloc.

Advertisement

Erdogan’s relationship with Putin reached a brand new low in 2015 when the Turkish military shot down a Russian fighter jet in Syria. Putin responded with economic sanctions and promoted an international offer label the Erdogan government as lively supporters of the Islamic State (IS).

However, an alliance with Russia was essential for Erdogan as he slowly left the Western bloc. In June 2016, Erdogan apologized to Putin and the 2 men quickly reached an agreement that included a partnership in managing the Syrian conflict.

Erdogan’s inconsistent foreign policy and growing authoritarianism have been met with aggression coup attempt in July 2016, Erdogan survived the ordeal and declared that it was “God’s gift” to cleanse the military and state of dissidents.

The result was the purge of hundreds of presidency staff, the seizure of billion-dollar businesses, and the imprisonment of greater than 120 journalists. That meant Türkiye jails more journalists than every other country.

Advertisement

Erdogan quickly dragged the Turkish army into the Syrian conflict, signaling that he was a player in Syria and the region. This was an unimaginable act without the Russian alliance. And an alliance with Putin in Syria means support for Assad when the boomerang in Erdogan’s relations returns to “my brother Assad” mode.

The fall of Aleppo and the ceasefire appear to be a victory for Putin, Erdogan and Assad, a minimum of within the short term. For Assad, just being on the international negotiating table is a victory. But even when he regains control over Syriacan have to fight an extended battle against the Islamic State, much like the continuing battles against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Putin will use his growing influence within the Middle East to weaken Western political and economic influence within the world. He will use his relationship with Erdogan’s Turkey to weaken NATO and make it irrelevant in the brand new world order or the disorder of populist leaders.

Most interestingly, Erdogan will claim that because the Sunni representative of the three, he brought peace to Syria. His brave efforts change the structure of Turkey the introduction of an executive presidential system during a state of emergency can only be understood when it comes to his strong desire to guide the Muslim world. He wants uninterrupted rule without critical dissent and political challenges in order that he can direct all his energy towards the greater Middle East.

Advertisement

As IS leader Abu-Bakr Baghdadi’s caliphate concoction fades, the world could have to come back to terms with Erdogan’s caliphate in 2017, the five hundredth anniversary of the Ottoman takeover of the caliphate from Egypt in 1517.

If Erdogan takes this step, it’s going to throw the region and the world into uncharted territory.

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

International

“Every blast is an open wound”: how the chaos of war raises a deadly superbug that spread all over the world

Published

on

By

The war in Gaza will leave its trail in some ways, long after the recently negotiated weapon suspension agreement between Israel and Hamas.

One legacy concerns how the chaos of war is an ideal storm for an increase in antimicrobial resistance.

Then the microorganisms evolve to resist drugs designed to kill them. These microbes turn into Superbugy, making previously effective ineffective and previously survivable, fatal infections.

Advertisement

We have already seen examples of resistance to antimicrobials In gas and other conflict zones around the world.

Resistance to antimicrobials is a growing problem around the world. Not only threatens human health, but additionally agricultureIN Food safety AND economy.

Resistance management to antimicrobials is complex. This primarily requires approaches, including prevention of infections, strategic restrictions on how antimicrobials are used, and solid healthcare systems.

In the conflict zones, the opposite is clearly visible.

Advertisement

Healthcare systems are disturbed

Armed conflicts Destructive healthcare infrastructure. Such conflicts often occur in places with limited resources At the starting.

Hospitals and diagnostic laboratories are damaged or damagedAnd the supplies are exhausted. Healthcare employees are killed or displaced.

The conflict zones remain with less ideal diagnostic abilities, treatment and care.

This makes stopping and controlling infection extremely difficult.

Advertisement

Vaccination is also disturbed

Disturbed vaccination programs can affect the development of resistance to antimicrobials in lots of direct and indirect ways.

For example, in conflict zones, less vaccinations against bacterial diseases result in more infections, Increasing the need for antibioticsand risk Resistance to antimicrobials develops.

Less vaccinations against viral diseases could cause people in conflict zones to be exposed to those viral infections, and in turn, Secondary bacterial infections. This results in the use of antibiotics as a safety measure or as treatment, promoting the development of resistance to antimicrobials.

Antibiotics are abused and used improperly

Widespread injuries, infections and poor hygiene in conflict zones are common. This results in excessive reference on antibiotics, especially those that act against the widest range of bacteria.

Advertisement

Ideally, broadly functioning antibiotics can be used sparingly and after diagnostic tests. However, treatment is needed and diagnostic possibilities are in danger. Thus, broadly functioning antibiotics are used way more often, which further promotes the development of resistance.

The problem is also less control, who has access to antibiotics in war -torn regions. Within the prescriptions, skilled supervision or diagnostic tests, antibiotics are utilized in a way that drives further resistance. This includes using them “just in case”, the use of those that will not be effective for this infection or injury, or using them for too long or not long enough.

For all these reasons, Abuse and improper use Antibiotics, although often inevitable, increase the likelihood that resistant microorganisms for formation and spread.

Wounds, infections, antibiotics

The armed conflict results in a large number of traumatic injuries. As the foremost surgeon Sergiy Kosulnykov in the Mechnikov hospital on Dnipro, Ukraine he said last yr:

Advertisement

Each blast is an open wound, and each open wound is an infection.

Treatment of these injuries requires antibiotics. However, in the conflict zones closing microorganisms are sometimes such Resistant to many drugs. This happens especially when microorganisms are purchased on the battlefield, in field hospitals or in other high -risk environments. After starting the resistance to antimicrobial circumstances, these circumstances facilitate microorganisms immune to additional antibiotics.

Unhygienic living conditions

Camps for refugees and shelters for displaced populations are sometimes overcrowded and should not have access to scrub water and appropriate sanitary conditions.

Thus, infections and resistant microorganisms are more common and spreading, deteriorating epidemics and supporting the evolution and spread of resistant microorganisms.

Wider breakdown Infrastructure of water and sanitary facilities It also supports the spread of microorganisms transmitted by water, increasing the spread and spread of resistant microorganisms.

Advertisement

No supervision and monitoring

Effective management of resistance to antimicrobials depends upon accurate diagnostic tests and solid supervision systems to trace resistance patterns and informing about treatment recommendations.

The conflict disturbs these systems, leaving the authorities blind to the emerging resistance trends. This disruption also delays the implementation of effective remedies.

Global spread of resistant pathogens

The conflict generates a large pool of immune to antimicrobials that can infect or colonize many individuals in the conflict zone and out of doors. People movement in the conflict zone and out of doors it contributes to this spread over the borders.

Refugees and displaced people often transfer resistant microorganisms to regions without or less earlier exposure, contributing to the global spread of resistance to antimicrobials.

Advertisement

Bacteria that are highly immune to many antibiotics are one example. They turned out to be problematic treatment in the United States military staff, which returned with combat injuries from Afghanistan and Iraq. The same bacteria were recorded in Great Britain as a potential source of life -threatening infections that spread easily in hospitals.

IN AfghanistanIN GauzeIN SyriaIN UkraineIN Yemen And elsewhere bacteria immune to many antibiotics appeared and prosper during conflicts and still do it.

What should we do about it?

Resistance to antimicrobials in regions affected by conflict requires urgent motion in addition to peace. This includes the reconstruction and maintenance of healthcare systems, improving sanitary conditions, regulation of the use of antibiotics and providing access to scrub water and vaccines.

International cooperation and everlasting investments are vital for alleviating the destructive impact on people affected by conflict.

Advertisement

Without this, antimicrobial resistance becomes one other catastrophic heritage of war, threatening human health and security for upcoming generations.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading

International

As Gaza Beasefiot, Israeli forces turn to Jenin – a regular goal perceived as a center of Palestinian resistance

Published

on

By

Just two days after the shaky suspension of the weapon handled within the Gaza Strip in Israel on January 21, 2025, a large indicator of the Jenin refugee camp in West Brzeg began.

Soldiers attacked a whole lot of houses in a city within the west bank, as the Israeli army called Operation “Counteracting Terrorism”striving to control again. Many analysts suggested that the raid was The rehearsal of the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to calm down Extremely right -wing members of his coalition, who oppose a weapon suspension agreement.

Regardless of the motive, the offensive was catastrophic for a lot of residents of the camp. The Israeli army has Damaged infrastructureIN Closed entrances to local hospitals AND forced According to reports of raids about 2,000 families. At the moment, life for the inhabitants of a densely populated camp – House for about 24,000 Palestinian refugees – It was difficult. Director of the West Bank Unrwa, UN Agency supervising refugees, described Camp conditions as “almost dissatisfied”.

Advertisement

The latest operation of the newest Israeli operation is just not latest. . Jenin refugee campAt the western end of town of Jenin within the north of the occupied west shore, he often experienced violence between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian fighters.

This violence escalated from October 7, 2023, when the Hamas bandits led an invasion of Israel, wherein about 1,200 people were killed. The camp faced large -scale repetitive military operations through the Israeli forces, including drone strikes, ground raids and raids which have caused widespread destruction. Meanwhile, Israeli settlers overthrow Palestinian cars and real estate, z 64 Such attacks In the very area of ​​Jenin from October 7, 2023. In December last 12 months, the Palestinian authorities, which he coordinates with Israel to supervise safety within the west shore, also attacked local fighters.

These events deepened political tensions and worsened the economic and humanitarian crises on the west shore. According to the UN, Over a quarter With Over 800 Palestinians were killed On the west shore, from October 7, the attack comes from the Jenin district; Several Israeli civilians They were also killed on the west shore in the identical period.

As Scholar of the Palestinian HistoryI see the last episode as the newest chapter in a for much longer history of Palestinian displacement and rise up of the Israeli occupation. Understanding this story helps to explain why, specifically, the Jenin camp became the goal of the Israeli offensive and the center of the Palestinian resistance of the fighter.

Advertisement

Camp conditions

Jenin, an agricultural city that reaches Ancient timesThe center of Palestinian resistance has long been. During the Arab-Israeli war from 1948, Arab fighters successfully pushed Israeli is trying to capture town.

At the tip of this war, town became a shelter for some a whole lot of hundreds of Palestinian refugees who escaped or were expelled from the land that became part of Israel. Jenin, together with the hilly interior of Palestine known as the West Bank, was annexed by Jordan.

UN agency and employees He founded the Jenin camp In 1953, west of town. Since then, the agency has basic services provided to the residents of the camp, including food, apartments and education.

Advertisement

The camp conditions have at all times been difficult. In the early years of the camp, refugees had to stand in long lines to receive food rations and for a long time there was a lack of electricity or running water.

The Jenin camp soon became the poorest and probably the most densely populated of 19 refugee camps on the west shore. And making an allowance for its location near “Green line” – The weapon line, which serves as the actual border of Israel – residents of the camp who were expelled from Northern Palestine, actually saw the homes and villages from which they were expelled. But they couldn’t come back to them.

Growth

From 1967, Jenin and the remainder of the west shore was occupied by the Israeli army.

The Israeli occupation of Jenin intensified the difficulties of these refugees. As statelessness, Palestinians couldn’t go home. But under Israeli occupation they might not live freely in Jenin. Human rights groups have long been documenting what has been described as “systematic pressurewhich incorporates Discriminative groundbrucks, forced evictions and travel limitations.

Advertisement

Seeing no other path forward, many young refugees of the camp turned Armed resistance.

In the Nineteen Eighties, groups such as Black Pantherswhich was related to the Palestinian nationalist organization Fatah, began attacks for Israeli purposes to end the occupation and liberate their family lands. In the entire The first Intifada – Palestinian Uprising lasting in 1987–1993 – The Israeli army attacked Jenin camp persistently, trying to arrest members of combat groups. During this process, sometimes Israeli forces also Demolished houses of members of the family and arrested relatives. Such acts of apparent collective penalties strengthened the thought of ​​many Palestinians that the Israeli occupation can only end with strength.

Members of the FATAH Battle Group in Jenin in 1991.
Esas Baitel/Gamma-Opho by Getty Images)

. Oslo’s peace process from the 90s – which consisted of a series of meetings between the Israeli government and Palestinian representatives – they led some There were fighters to hope that the occupation can as a substitute end negotiations. But the inhabitants of the Jenin camp remained marginalized on the west shore and sealed Israel, seeing slight improvement In their lives, even after the transfer of administrative rights from Israel to the Palestinian autonomy in 1995.

Independent projects such as The Freedom Theater It ensured the relief of refugees within the camp, however it was not enough to overcome grinding poverty or violence with which they encountered Israeli soldiers and settlers. Before the second Intifada exploded in 2000, many teenagers of the camp joined the group of fighters. Including co -founder Freedom Theater Zakaria Zubeidi, who joined Brigade of Martyrs al-Aqs related to Fatah. Like young people from the 80s, in addition they got here to the conclusion that only armed resistance would end the occupation.

Advertisement

A cycle of violence?

In April 2002, the Israeli army attacked the Jenin camp, hoping that it will launch such armed groups. In the camp there have been fierce clashes between Israeli soldiers and young Palestinian men, strengthening the repute of Jenin amongst Palestinians as “The capital of resistance. “

No progress in peaceful talks since then Israel Settlement constructing In the occupied land-considered illegal in accordance with international law-the inclusion of hard Israeli politicians in the federal government tightened the reluctance to the camp. The surveys are increasingly more often showing Palestinians Support armed resistance.

Trying to protect the camp from Israeli entertainment, in 2021 a group of local residents formed the Jenin brigades. While its founder was related to Palestinian Islamic jihad, the group quickly drew from fighters from various political fractions. Members acquired weapons, patrolled the streets and fought with Israeli military intrusion. Until 2022, they announced that the part of the camp was “liberated“From the Israeli occupation.

Seemingly concerned Increase In the Israel camp, he dramatically accelerated the raids in 2022. It was during such a raid that the Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh was killed by an Israeli soldier.

Advertisement

On July 3, 2023, the Israeli army Jenin attackedWithdrawal after two days of heavy air bombing and ground invasion, which killed 12 Palestinians and ran over 100.

The last offensive could exceed the number of fatalities from At least 10 killed On the primary day of the fight. But the camping related to the camp was in-built a long time of resistance and rise up within the face of the occupation that Israel was slight within the carburet. Similarly, this time, I feel, such a combat within the camp will increase only with the newest deaths and destruction.

Advertisement
This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

International

When Syria is thinking about a democratic future: 5 lessons from Arab Spring

Published

on

By

. The fall of the dictatorship of Bashar Assad In December 2024, he initiated the nervous time of hope and fear of Syrians about future management within the long war.

Although it is not clear what exact political path Syria will likely be, the dilemmas facing the country are just like the experiences of other Arab countries over ten years ago. In the winter of 2010, the outbreak of protests in Tunisia spread throughout the region, overthrowing several regimes In what became referred to as the Arabian Uprising.

While some countries – Egypt and Tunisia – have turn out to be a democracy, although briefly, others, resembling Yemen, Libya and Syria, descended into violence.

Advertisement

In the tip of the years, scientists of political sciences from world wide examined these political changes, taking a look at why so many Arab countries The democratic reform path couldn’t be continued. As a political scientist with specialist knowledge within the regionI distilled it’s research In five key lessons that would now assist in Syria, because he tries to construct a stable and democratic state.

1. Islamist politicians are the primary politicians, and secondly Islamists

One of probably the most smoking questions, given the political direction of Syria after Assad, is the role of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, a group of rebels, which led to the overthrow of Assad.

Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is a former a part of Al-Qaeda who has been withdrawn from the extremist ideology since then There are worries that this moderation is temporary. While some observers might imagine so All Islamist groups need to rigidly implement a narrow interpretation of Islamic law Like the Taliban in Afghanistan, Studies show a much wider range of possibilities For politicians implemented by Islamist groups implemented throughout the office.

For example, the Tunisian Islamist group Ennahda She defended democracy a lot And he helped Write a liberal structure After the country was removed by Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in 2011. Similarly, in Egypt, after removing the leader of the Hosni Mubarak engine in the identical 12 months, the Muslim Brotherhood, once a spare Islamic movement, competed successfully and honesty within the democratic processHowever, after all, he put up the identical challenges of every ruling side within the implementation of the principles in power.

Advertisement
Anti -government protesters have fun at Tahrir Square in the middle of Cairo in February 2011 after the autumn of the then President Hosni Mubarak.
AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti

But such a path is not predetermined. A recent democratic distance and hug of authoritarianism shows that Islamist politicians resembling President Recep Tayyip Erdogan Undermine democracy when it serves their interests.

Political research has appeared repeatedly that Islamist politicians are like politicians world wide: after they should win elections, they will contribute to the fears of voters. According to data from regional research, most Arabs Express the preference for religious leaders who’re apolitical.

If Syria becomes a democracy, I believe Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham will probably still should take moderation. But whether the group supports democracy is dependent upon the calculation of the organization of what its future looks like in democracy in comparison with more authoritarian types of management. Wide negotiations covering all pages in Syria might help persuade Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham that continuing the trail of moderation is of their best interest. Although nobody can forecast what latest Syria institutions will seem like, research shows that Islamists are as likely as secular parties support democratic norms.

2. The end of corruption is vital

One of Drivers of Arab Spring And the Syrian revolution was anger at corrupt business agreements. Indeed, the relatives and buddies of Assad in truth a monopole over lucrative industries resembling Mobile phone networks. Relaxing these corrupt courtyards and opening industries to competition and license needs to be a superior priority for people searching for a less autocratic future.

Advertisement

In Tunisia, The established corporations fought with anti -corruption reforms Because they said it will hurt investments and growth. But the rationale why economic growth is so weak in lots of parts of the Middle East is Precisely due to these rooted corporations.

The diaspora in Syria has many talented businessmen who can return and find revolutionary corporations if the brand new government opens investments and entrepreneurship outside individuals with political connections.

3. The political dispute is high-quality

Many hopes that the brand new Syria government will likely be free and quite elected. In order for democracy to work, it must effectively make changes Response to voters’ fears.

Initially, Syria can have to Decide on basic principles resembling a structure that may cover many alternative groups. This wide coalition may be easier to attain compromises Due to the joint experience of the opposition as a part of the previous dictatorship. However, an attempt to keep up this unity can mask Important political debates that must occur.

Advertisement

In order for voters to see the change, electoral competition must bring a actual change in politics. The best coalitions of events in Tunisia He promoted unity as an alternative of fighting difficult decisions This resonated with on a regular basis fears of individuals. In time, the voters stopped Identifying the parties and lost confidence within the elections. The elected President of Tunisia, Kais Saed, took advantage of this apathy to shut the parliament of the country – an motion that was Essentially popular Despite the lack of democracy.

A practical response to this concern is to construct strong parties, the explanations that pro-democratic organizations resembling National Democratic Institute are superb in. Effective pages help voters Preparation of a package of rules that may go through parliament and constructing a coalition.

While the opposition of Syria has extensive experience in waging war, it has relatively little on the road to campaigns and constructing Strong party brands. These more mundane goals are a key connective tissue that makes democracy work.

The crowd collects on protests.
Tunisians gather during a protest against President Kais Sared in Tunis in January 2023, months after the president adopted huge latest presidential rights, which largely pushed the spring democratic changes to Arab.
AP Photo/Hassene Didi

4. Bureaucrats should serve society

Elections are chosen by leaders, but durable, popular changes also require bureaucrats who implement latest policies – so -called “Horizontal responsibility. “The Democratic Egyptian government after 2011 left many state institutions intact, and later with rebel Autonomous anti -democratic agencies. Meanwhile, in Sudan, through which a short breakthrough of liberalization after the overthrow of his longtime dictator, Omar Al-Bashira, in 2019 This was still disillusioned since the bureaucrats lobbyed politicians for support.

Without the cooperation of bureaucrats, basic state services fall, which results in such phenomena Criminal waves and lack of trust in democracy.

Advertisement

The government led by Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham in Syria has already begun reform of bureaucracy by racing high officials from the previous regime, maintaining rank and files. However, effective supervision requires participation of chosen leaders with an ID card requiring responsibility from bureaucrats. For those that need to be involved within the transition of Syria, providing technical support in the fast reconstruction of ministries is one in every of the ways to extend the probabilities of a successful transition.

5. Hold the military close

If the brand new government of Syria falls, history suggests that the military will likely be the almost definitely wrongdoer. The Egyptian army undermined the democratic passage of the country through secretly supporting the anti -Islamistic opposition. The Sudan army agreed to the protesting demands of latest leadership, but De facto providing control over vital government institutions.

Recent studies show that keeping the military on top of things means Giving her part in democracy by financing the items needed, resembling salaries and equipment. However, it is equally vital Establishment of civil control over the military, ordering a military report back to chosen leaders about its budgets, politicians and deployments. Military assistance is mandatory, but it surely still have to be related to strict obligations to civil control.

The future is Syria

Political crossings are too complex to set off on easy forecasts. But the experience of countries that recorded the expansion and reduce in democracy in Arab spring, and later winter might help latest Syria leaders avoid expensive political mistakes.

Advertisement

Ultimately, nevertheless, the fate of the country rests with its own people. They survived the Assad regime – and who will make a very powerful decisions for the longer term of Syria.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending