Connect with us

International

Crisis in the Middle East: Explaining US Airstrikes on Iran-backed Armed Groups

Published

on

US airstrikes against Iran-backed armed groups February 2 been expected for a while. Since the Hamas attacks in Israel on October 7, U.S. forces in the Middle East have change into the goal of more frequent attacks 150 times. These attacks, mainly on US bases in Iraq and Syria, caused minimal damage resulting from US air defense capabilities.

The Biden administration responded modest strikes in places where weapons are stored and militia training. But drone attack On January 28, three soldiers were killed and dozens of others were wounded at Tower 22, an American base on the Jordan-Syria border.

For many Washingtonians, the death was an unofficial red line political pressure quickly pushed President Biden to reply more forcefully against armed groups – and even against Iran itself.

Officials stated that the airstrikes targeted command and control sites, intelligence centers and drone storage facilities in Iraq and Syria linked to militias, in addition to the armed forces Quds Forcebranch of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Biden he also stated that the United States will proceed strikes at a time and place of its selecting.

Although the response was more widespread than previous strikes precisely calibrated to avoid fueling a wider war. Moreover, the United States signaled its intentions several days in advance, giving groups and their advisors time to take motion to reduce casualties.

The targets were militant groups

There are approx 40 militant groups in the Iran-backed region. These include famous groups equivalent to Hamaswhich carried out the October 7 attack in Israel, in addition to Hezbollah, which has been involved in cross-border shelling with Israel on the border with Lebanon since October. Meanwhile, Houthi rebels in Yemen faced separate Strikes in the USA and Great Britain in response to their attack on merchant ships in the Red Sea.

But many other, smaller groups are also lively. Claimed responsibility for deadly drone attack Islamic resistance movement in Iraqa loose network of Iran-backed militias, incl Kataib Hezbollah, which fought with coalition forces during the Iraq War. These and other militias proceed to focus on U.S. troops remaining in the region to stop a resurgence of the Islamic State.

Map showing the location and variety of attacks on US bases in the Middle East since October 7.
Institute of War Studies

Iran ensure a mixture of coaching, intelligence, financing and weapons for groups inside the self-proclaimed “axis of resistance”. But Tehran not fully in control militias that operate with various degrees of autonomy and might be higher viewed as troops moderately than proxies.

US political elections

The Biden administration is walking a tightrope in the Middle East. On the one hand, the administration’s primary goal for the last 4 months has been prevention a regional war in the wake of the Hamas attack and subsequent war in Gaza. At the same time, the United States sought to discourage adversaries who increasingly used military force against U.S. personnel (and, in the case of the Red Sea, against international merchant ships).

The challenge was to find out a response that will be strong enough to discourage further attacks, but not so devastating as to impress a full-fledged war.

As the election 12 months approaches, Biden faces additional scrutiny from home over his foreign policy decisions. Donald Trump has long been attempting to make Biden look weak towards Iran, which many Democrats did critical the president’s use of airstrikes, in addition to his approach to the war in Gaza. Calibrated weekend raids will likely attract much more criticism on each side – for going too far or not far enough.

Conflict in Gaza

There is not any guarantee that a ceasefire (temporary or everlasting) will put an end to attacks on US troops in Iraq and Syria or Houthi attacks on ships in the Red Sea. However, it can’t be denied that the crisis in Gaza has emboldened armed groups across the region repeatedly he used the war to justify himself their shares.

A man walks past a wall with portraits of leaders of Iran-sponsored armed groups in the Middle East.
US and UK airstrikes also targeted Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.
EPA-EFE/Yahya Arhab

The United States, Egypt and Qatar acted as intermediaries between Israel and Hamas negotiate the contract this might mean a halt to military operations in Gaza in exchange for the gradual release of the hostages. Though clearly crucial to hostages and their families and for civilian population of Gazathe agreement may be key to easing, at the least temporarily, other tensions in the region.

Although the deal is much from final agreementthe nature of the US attacks was probably partly calibrated to avoid disrupting the process.

Preventing regional wars

Iran, in addition to Iraq and Syria, they condemned strikes and accused the US of aggression. But Iran didn’t give it plans revenge. This suggests that Tehran – like Washington – remains to be interested to avoid direct conflict with the USA.

Meanwhile, Kataib Hezbollah announced it I just want attacks on US soldiers, other armed groups have stated This this will not be the end and they’ll proceed to strike against the US presence in the region.

A goal for the Biden administration prevention regional war remains to be the right goal, even – or perhaps especially – in the face of rising tensions. A policy of cautious calibration coupled with meaningful negotiations to halt the war in Gaza might not be as politically tempting as flexing U.S. military power – but it surely is the approach most consistent with long-term U.S. and regional interests.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

International

Iran’s strike against Israel was retaliatory – but it was also about saving face and restoring deterrence

Published

on

By

Israel and Iran are at war. In fact, each side have been fighting for many years, but the conflict has largely been fought under the duvet of covert and clandestine operations.

Recent actions by each side of this once “shadow war” have modified the character of the conflict. It is unclear whether de-escalation is on the horizon.

On October 1, 2024, Iran carried out an enormous, direct attack on Israel hypothetically in retaliation for Israel’s double assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah chief Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah.

This is the second such attack in six months.

By multiple accounts, the previous Iranian attack on Israel on April 13 – which consisted of over 300 ballistic and cruise missiles and attack drones – caused little or no damage to Israel. Perhaps for this reason, and perhaps partly for this reason as well The US encourages restraintthen Israel’s immediate military response – an coating against a single advanced Iranian air defense system in Isfahan Province – was somewhat balanced.

Many observers saw the calibrated exchange in April as a possible indication that each side would accomplish that they like de-escalation reasonably than engage in ongoing open warfare.

However, further Israeli military operations since then have triggered an escalation of the Iranian military response, pushing the conflict out of the shadows.

As Hamas’s capabilities and leadership within the Gaza Strip degraded, so did Israeli military leaders they announced in June that they did “ready to face” Hezbollah, the Iran-backed Lebanese militant group whose continued rocket attacks on northern Israel have caused tens of 1000’s to evacuate area.

Israel heads north

Israel’s pivot from Gaza towards Lebanon coincided with the assassination of Hamas politburo chairman Haniyeh on July 31, 2024, while he was in Tehran. The alleged Israeli operation was seen as insulting Iran’s sovereignty. That was a shame too which highlighted the vulnerability and permeability of Iran’s internal security apparatus.

Although Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei announced a “strong reaction” against Israel, Iran took no motion until September.

Tehran’s passivity has raised doubts amongst many Middle East analysts whether Iran’s response will ever come – and, subsequently, what this may mean for Khamenei’s involvement in his proxy forces.

If indeed Iran’s leaders opted for restraint after the assassination of Hamas’s top political leader, the identical couldn’t be said for its response to Israel’s multi-phase operation against Hezbollah in mid-September.

Israel began with a covert operation to sow chaos and confusion in Hezbollah’s command and control through means sabotaged explosive communication devices. Israel then carried out elimination airstrikes Hezbollah’s top leaders including Nasrallah. The Israeli military then launched what the country’s leaders call “limited operation (terrestrial).” to southern Lebanon to clear Hezbollah positions along the northern border.

According to many Middle East experts, Tehran’s October 1 attack in response to Israel was indeed just that Iranian military leadersprimarily, retaliation for 2 high-profile assassinations of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders.

These were actually key aspects. But as expert on Iran’s defense strategyI argue that Iran’s leaders also felt compelled to attack Israel for 3 equally, if no more, necessary reasons: to slow Israel’s advance into Lebanon, to save lots of face, and to revive deterrence.

Questioning Israel’s Progress

Iran hopes to slow and potentially reverse Israel’s successes against Hezbollah, especially as Israel begins ground operations in southern Lebanon. Of course, Israeli ground troops now face what’s arguably the world’s strongest guerrilla fighting force – one which turned out quite successfully in the course of the Israel-Hezbollah war in 2006.

Nevertheless, Israel’s ability to tactically surprise and eliminate top Hezbollah leaders – even within the midst of an ongoing local war, and even after Israeli leaders announced their intention to have interaction Hezbollah – reveals a much superior Israeli strategy and operational planning and execution capabilities than Hezbollah.

And this represents an enormous blow to what’s seen in Iran because the crown jewel of the Islamic Republic in its “Axis of Resistance.”

In this context, Iran’s retaliatory attack on October 1 may be seen as an attempt to provide Hezbollah time to react appoint substitute managementregroup and organize against the Israeli ground invasion.

The brutal art of saving face?

It also helps Iran save face, especially within the eyes of other parts of its external proxy network.

Organized by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC – Tehran’s essential arm coordinating external operations – Iranian money, training, guidance and ideological support enabled and encouraged Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 – regardless that, it claims, Iran received no advance warning of the attack.

Since then, Hamas fighters have received almost no real-time support from Tehran. This lack of support little question contributed to Israel’s effective downgrading of Hamas to a threat, with lots of its members killed or in hiding and unable to mount a coherent offensive campaign, leading Israeli military leaders to say that the group had been dismantled successfully defeated.

It is not any wonder that Iran is glad to permit the Palestinians to fight Tehran’s enemies and absorb the human costs of the war, since such an arrangement primarily advantages the Islamic Republic.

When the fighting in Gaza began, the IRGC was nowhere to be seen.

Rockets fired from Iran are seen over Jerusalem, October 1, 2024.
Wisam Hashlamoun/Anadolu via Getty Images

Now that Israel has turned its attention to Lebanon and achieved some initial tactical successes against Hezbollah, Iran cannot afford to face by for 2 essential reasons. First, a 12 months of fighting in Gaza has shown that Israel is willing to do whatever is essential to eliminate threats along its borders – including a willingness to withstand international political pressure or operate inside Iran’s borders.

Second, Iran’s proxy groups elsewhere are watching whether Tehran will proceed to support them – or abandon them, as it apparently did with Hamas.

Recovering deterrence

Perhaps above all, Tehran’s calculations on how one can respond include the necessity for Iran to revive its deterrence mechanism.

Two defining features of Iran’s interconnected external relations, viz.defense forward” and deterrence strategies are the regional network of combat proxies and its arsenal of long-range weaponswhich incorporates a lot of advanced ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and attack-capable drones.

These Iranian defense strategies aim to dissuade enemies from attacking Iran directly in two ways: first, by threatening Israel and other U.S. regional allies with punishment through proxy militias or long-range weapons attacks; second, offering scapegoats against which Iran’s enemies can express their fury. In effect, Iran’s proxy forces act as proxy targets that pay the prices of Iran’s hostile policies.

Israel’s demotion of Hamas and ongoing operations against Hezbollah threaten to weaken Iran’s ability to discourage attacks on its homeland. For the leaders of the Islamic Republic, that is an unacceptable risk.

Who makes the subsequent move?

These intertwining imperatives likely led Iran’s leaders to launch a second massive direct missile attack on Israel on October 1. It is unclear how effective the attack will likely be in achieving any of Tehran’s goals.

The Islamic Republic claimed as many as 90% of ballistic missiles reached their intended targetswhile Israel and the United States characterize the attack as “defeated and ineffective,” despite unverified mobile videos showing several ballistic missiles exploding after reaching land in Israel.

However, it is sort of certain that this may not be the last move within the conflict. Israel is unlikely to halt its operation in Lebanon until it achieves its border security goals. And Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did it announced retaliation against Iran for its latest retaliatory attack.

IRGC leaders were met with this warning: own counter-threat that if Israel responds militarily to the October 1 attack, Iran will again respond with unspecified “crushing and destructive attacks.”

Rhetorically, neither side is budging; militarily, this may increasingly also be true. The nature and scope of Israel’s next move will determine how the war with Iran develops – but make no mistake, it is a war.


This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

International

A year of escalating conflict in the Middle East has ushered in a new era of regional displacement

Published

on

By

The year of conflict ushered in a new era of mass displacement in the Middle East.

Since Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, and the subsequent sustained Israeli bombardment of Gaza, Israel has expanded its operations on multiple fronts, including the West Bank, Yemen, Syria, and Lebanon.

As fighting continues unabated and prospects of direct confrontation between Iran and Israel grow, the region is now in a new period of internal and cross-border displacement that has already displaced hundreds of thousands of people.

How scholars resettlementwe fear that the effects of such displacement will impact the region for years to return and can likely further impede the region’s residents’ ability to live safely.

Displaced and imprisoned in Gaza

Israel’s constant attacks forced almost 2 million Palestinians have fled their homes in Gaza over the past year, representing 9 out of 10 residents of the densely populated strip.

What is it? unique in scale displacement in Gaza is that nearly all IDPs remain trapped and unable to depart the territory as a result of the ongoing border closure and bombardment of Israel.

This has intensified cascading humanitarian crises, including hunger and spread of the diseasetogether with countless other difficulties that make normal life almost not possible.

For many Palestinians in Gaza, the yearlong bombing has meant repeated displacement as Israeli attacks spread from area to area amid a shrinking humanitarian space.

And although they exist complex historical and geopolitical reasons on border closures, international law experts say Egypt and Israel do violated international refugee law by refusing to permit Palestinians in Gaza to cross the border at Rafah to hunt asylum.

The situation in Gaza is structurally different from previous displacement crises in the region – even in civil war-torn Syria, where cross-border aid operations proceed to he was on edge fall. That’s because Israel still limits and block aid in the territory, and aid staff struggle to offer the bare minimum of food, shelter and medical care during bombing campaigns that rarely end.

Palestinians have a look at the destruction after an Israeli airstrike on a crowded tent camp housing Palestinians displaced by the war in the Gaza Strip.
AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana

What’s worse, the experience of the past year has shown this refugee camps, civilian residential buildings, UN schoolsAND hospitals serving civilians and refugees should not protected spaces. Israel often justifies its attacks on such sites by claiming that they’re utilized by Hamas or Hezbollah, despite the formal UN presence disputes With many these accusations. Last year, these targeted Israeli attacks also killed not less than 220 UN staff – greater than every other crisis in history.

This makes it difficult for aid staff to access those in need, especially displaced people. For its part, the United States continues to be so the most vital donor the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) and the UN Palestinian Refugee Agency (UNRWA), in addition to a major arms supplier to Israel.

Beyond Gaza, to Lebanon

In Lebanon, mass displacement can be a result of Israel’s developing war with Hezbollah.

Even before the September escalation of the conflict on the Lebanese-Israeli border almost 100,000 Lebanese have been displaced from their homes in the south of the country by Israeli shelling. Meanwhile, roughly 63,000 Israelis were inside the country resettled from the north of the country as a result of Hezbollah rocket attacks.

But from the end of September 2024 in Israel strikes targeting Hezbollah and Palestinian targets in Beirut and across Lebanon have killed tons of of civilians and exponentially increased internal and cross-border displacement. Over 1 million Lebanese now they’ve escaped their homes inside days in the face of Israeli invasion and bombing.

And a Syrian one at that refugees Lebanon’s large population of migrant staff was also displaced, with many sleeping on the streets or in makeshift tents, unable to access buildings converted into shelters for Lebanese.

In a separate, striking example of reverse migration, roughly 230,000 people – each Lebanese and Syrians – they escaped across the border with Syria.

Smoke billows around a lone firefighter as he pours hgoza on the ground.
Hezbollah rocket attacks in northern Israel forced tens of hundreds of Israelis to evacuate.
Images by Amir Levy/Getty

Coming full circle to recent regional conflicts over displacement and the post-2011 Arab rebellion crisis, returning house is a dangerous option for a lot of Syrians who still fear reprisal from the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Israel’s ongoing invasion of Lebanon will likely only reinforce these trends because the country ordered Many villages and towns in the south of the country were evacuated – many miles above the UN-recognized buffer zone.

Layers of regional movements

Over several a long time, the Middle East has experienced quite a few large-scale cross-border displacements for a myriad of reasons. The original forced displacement of Palestinians related to the creation of Israel in 1948 and subsequent conflicts created a world the longest refugee situation, with roughly 6 million Palestinians living across the Levant. The first Gulf War, the sanctions imposed on Iraq in the Nineteen Nineties and the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 produced hundreds of thousands of refugees, and political repercussions for the region.

More recently, the 2011 Arab uprisings and subsequent wars in Syria, Yemen and Libya resulted in hundreds of thousands of refugees in addition to internally displaced people, with almost 6 million Syrians still live in Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, and one other 6 million have been displaced in Syria. With Syrians largely not returning home, international organizations have change into a semi-permanent safety net providing essential services to refugees and host communities.

New layers of displacement in Lebanon – residents, refugees and migrant staff – in addition to cross-border flows into Syria will result in further burden on the underfunded humanitarian aid system.

Moreover, the current war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon will not be the first conflict between the state and its northern neighbor that has preceded large-scale displacement. In an try to eliminate the Palestine Liberation Organization, Israel invaded Lebanon in 1978 and again in 1982. The 1982 Israeli invasion led to Sabra and Shatila massacres 1,500-3,000 Palestinian civilians – carried out by Israel’s Lebanese Christian allies – showing that military operations that don’t distinguish between combatants and civilians can have devastating consequences for displaced populations.

Civilians bear the brunt

Between 600,000 and 900,000 Lebanese he fled abroad throughout the period of the country’s civil war in 1975–1990.

Two a long time later, Israel invaded Lebanon again in 2006 in an try to suppress Hezbollah, leading approximately 900,000 Lebanese to flee south – each internally and across the border with Syria.

While the speed and volume of Lebanese displacement in 2006 was unprecedented at the time, the number of people forced to flee in late September and early October 2024 quickly exceeded that record.

Thus, the region is well versed in the consequences of mass movements. However, one year into the current conflict, it is evident that the Middle East is now in a new era of displacement – in terms of scale and kind.

It appears that the number of families disrupted by this new era of displacement will only increase. Tensions in the region further escalated with new missile attacks on Israel from Iran and Iran threats of retaliation by Israel.

The experience of a long time of conflict in the region shows that civilians will most definitely bear the brunt of the fighting, whether through forced displacement, lack of access to food and medical care, or death.

Only through a cessation of current hostilities and a lasting ceasefire across the region can conditions be created in order that at-risk populations can begin to return and rebuild. This is particularly true for people displaced in Gaza, who’ve repeatedly been forced to flee their homes but have had no borders to cross to safety and for whom a political solution stays elusive.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading

International

A year after the Hamas attack, there is more continuity than change for the Palestinians and Israel

Published

on

By

The rapid pace of events between Israel and the Palestinians, and in the wider Middle East, could make people think that change is inevitable.

Political scientists like me, I sometimes witness significant and groundbreaking events, comparable to the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, and its aftermath, as aspects causing increased insecurity amongst the potential to drive wider change.

But not much has modified since this year.

Relatively stable established order on October 6

Throughout the first a part of 2023, relations between Israel and the Palestinians and the wider region appeared generally stable. In September 2023, US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan declared that the Middle East “isquieter than it has been for 20 years

Palestinians widely believed that their representatives – the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip – they were corrupt and he deserved it little or no public trust. At the same time, Palestinian factionalism and division between the West Bank and Gaza he was unbeatable.

Israeli society has endured nine months of widespread demonstrations against the government’s conservative reforms, including proposed limits on judicial power. In fact, elements of Israeli democracy, including its laws and liberal values, were has been weakening for a few years.

Israel’s relations with the Palestinians were stable if tense. Israel exercised military control over Palestinians living in the occupied West Bank.

Israel’s approach to managing the conflict with the Palestinians has been based on surveillance technology and intelligence gathering to make sure the security of its borders with the Gaza Strip. Periodic military operations were believed to discourage Hamas from open violence. Similarly, economic incentives comparable to thousands and thousands of dollars in money transferred to Hamas through Qatar and work permits for Gazans to enter Israel.

The Israeli government’s approach was this whose goal was to sever ties between Gaza and the West Bankso as to weaken the Palestinian Authority. The ultimate goal was to stop political negotiations around the prospect from re-emerging Palestinian statehood.

In the US, the Biden administration did this has focused its attention abroad totally on China. The attention she paid to the Middle East was largely involved defense pact with Saudi Arabia this may include restoring diplomatic relations between the Saudis and Israel, with little or no attention to the Palestinian issue.

Other key Middle Eastern countries, including Egypt and Saudi Arabia, also found it convenient to focus less on the Palestinian issue. Their national security goals countering Iran’s growing power equated with Israeli ones.

Iran was also all in favour of maintaining the established order. This has been pursued restore ties with various Arab governments and obtain some easing of economic sanctions. Some relief got here inside Prisoner exchange in August 2023 from the USA

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken (R) greets Qatari Minister of State Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Al-Khulaifi during a gathering in Doha, Qatar, August
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Qatar / Leaflet / Anadolu via Getty Images

The prospect of change

Experts and analysts have identified the October 7 attack and subsequent Israeli bombing campaign and subsequent ground invasion of Gaza as creating a likelihood for change.

A consensus emerged amongst observers that the Hamas attack made this clear Palestinian demands for self-determination they weren’t going to vanish quietly.

Action suggestions included resumption of political negotiations for a Palestinian state, reforming the Palestinian Authority to revive its legitimacy, and engaging neighboring countries to secure and rebuild Gaza in exchange for improved diplomatic relations with Israel.

Calls for change have come from across the world community, with public demonstrations around the world. International legal institutions called for peace and tranquility: The International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court launched an investigation into the actions of each Hamas and Israel.

A little change a year later

A year later, not much of what people imagined had happened.

The Palestinian Authority is focused by itself survival amid growing instability in the West Bankincluding violence by Israeli settlers, Israeli military operations, and resistance by Palestinian militants.

The humanitarian conditions in Gaza are dire, including: acute level of hunger, water shortages and poor sanitation. Some fighting continues Hamas is attempting to regroup where possible.

In Israel, as the war against Hamas continued, so too did Israel’s means of apostasy from democracy, marked by restrictions on freedom of speech and increasingly widespread nationalist hawkish sentiment. Despite continuing protests and calls for his resignation, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s pro-war coalition will survive and will likely survive until the scheduled elections in October 2026.

The statements and actions of the Israeli ruling coalition indicate that it intends to avoid resolving the conflict until the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and expanding security buffer zones under Israeli military control Lebanon AND Gauze.

The United States has been very energetic, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken visiting the region nine times President Joe Biden officially begins negotiations for a ceasefire and hostage deal in the short term and for regional negotiations in the long run. After one ceasefire and release of over 100 hostagesnone of those efforts resulted in an extra cessation of the war or the release of the hostages.

As the fall elections approach, it is unclear which U.S. efforts will proceed. Majority of the American public – 62% – wants the United States to play little or no rolein resolving the Israel-Hamas war.

Video shows Iranian missiles attacking Israel on October 1, 2024.

Broader interests prevail

Other Middle Eastern countries publicly support and often take part in U.S.-led negotiations, but all are careful to take care of their very own interests.

For example, Egypt and Jordan are concerned about the so-called the potential for more Palestinians to flee the fighting and come to their territories. The Saudis and the United Arab Emirates fear that the conflict may spill over to other countries.

Iran’s position has strengthened barely, with increasing power and attention on their proxiesincluding Hamas, Hezbollah, the Assad regime in Syria, Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria, and the Houthis in Yemen.

Until the missile attacks on Israel on October 1, 2024, Iran had consistently signaled that its fundamental interest was to avoid a regional war. Its recent president, Masoud Pezeshkian, has repeatedly spoken about his desire constructive dialogue with the West.

Overall, despite almost a year of fighting and lack of life, there is more continuity than change. International courts take their time and have limited powers. Israel’s democratic apostasy, its 57 years of career Palestinian territories, Palestinian fragmentation and weak governance, in addition to the lack of real commitment from nearby countries and the United States – in addition to the absence of any stable or peaceful solution.

This article was originally published on : theconversation.com
Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News Directly In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Trending